g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 127,065
- 70,802
- 2,605
It's amazing to me how there are so many people that are so completely unable to think logically that they believe that absense of proof is proof of absense. Just because there are relatively few known cases of voter fraud doesn't mean that there is no voter fraud. Why is that so hard to understand?
So you are offering imaginary scenarios as evidence Voter ID is necessary?
I'm sorry, but claims require evidence.
You are abusing the "proof of absence" scenario. You are like a UFO believer who claims that even though he has no evidence of UFOs, that does not mean UFOs don't exist.
If one claims there are UFOs, one must provide the evidence they exist.
If one claims we need Voter ID, one must provide the evidence it is needed. You cannot claim it is needed and then state you don't have to provide evidence. You can't whine about "proof of absence". You want the new regulations and more government intervention in the constitutional right to vote? Prove it is necessary.
You have not. No one has. They just offer imaginary scenarios.
Dead people voting is not evidence of a need for the reasons I have explained countless times.
Illegals voting is not evidence of a need for the reasons I have explained countless times.
Someone voting in your name is not evidence of a need for the reasons I have explained countless times.
Last edited: