Judge Sunni Rules Anti-Collective Bargining Law "Null and Void"

[traveler52]

Wisconsin Judge MaryAnn Sunni has ruled that the Anti-Collective Rights Bill passed by the Wisconsin Repugs and signed by the Wanker "Null and Void".

The law violated the "Open Meetings Law" of Wisconsin that requires a 24-hour notice to allow for public comments. Repugs did not allow for such comments by the public.

Damn those Pesky Rights of The People.

 

[daveman]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

 

[Zander]

Oh darn. Now they'll have to do it again.

 

[traveler52]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

Lame Dave. Very very, very very, very very, very, very,


VERY FRACKING LAME


You cannot rebut the illegal nature of the law, it violated the "Open Meetings" Laws of Wisconsin. So, what does davey do? Why lacking a cogent, logical, supportable argument he does what any good low life scum sucking "Proud ConJob" (IF there is such an animal, which I doubt) do? He attempts to deflect or misdirect the argument so as to not be able to answer the question or address the issue at hand.

F+ for content. F++ for lameness.

Wow, you are so fracking lame.

 

[daveman]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

Lame Dave. Very very, very very, very very, very, very,


VERY FRACKING LAME


You cannot rebut the illegal nature of the law, it violated the "Open Meetings" Laws of Wisconsin. So, what does davey do? Why lacking a cogent, logical, supportable argument he does what any good low life scum sucking "Proud ConJob" (IF there is such an animal, which I doubt) do? He attempts to deflect or misdirect the argument so as to not be able to answer the question or address the issue at hand.

F+ for content. F++ for lameness.

Wow, you are so fracking lame.

So...Obama gets a pass.

He can do no wrong, huh?

 

[jillian]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

apples and oranges. the law requires that the bill be published for a certain amount of time before it was acted upon. they got arrogant and desperate and violated it.

obama made a campaign promise. nice. but not legally enforceable. that said, there's still far more transparency than the prior 8 years. you can agree or not. but that's how i see it. (although that isn't what this thread is about so i'd rather not offtrack it).

all of that being the case, it will be interesting to see what happens on appeal.

 

[daveman]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

apples and oranges. the law requires that the bill be published for a certain amount of time before it was acted upon. they got arrogant and desperate and violated it.

obama made a campaign promise. nice. but not legally enforceable. that said, there's still far more transparency than the prior 8 years. you can agree or not. but that's how i see it. (although that isn't what this thread is about so i'd rather not offtrack it).

all of that being the case, it will be interesting to see what happens on appeal.

Indeed.

 

[Ravi]

Excellent!

 

[Vanquish]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

Lame Dave. Very very, very very, very very, very, very,


VERY FRACKING LAME


You cannot rebut the illegal nature of the law, it violated the "Open Meetings" Laws of Wisconsin. So, what does davey do? Why lacking a cogent, logical, supportable argument he does what any good low life scum sucking "Proud ConJob" (IF there is such an animal, which I doubt) do? He attempts to deflect or misdirect the argument so as to not be able to answer the question or address the issue at hand.

F+ for content. F++ for lameness.

Wow, you are so fracking lame.

So...Obama gets a pass.

He can do no wrong, huh?

If in doubt, repeat the same bullshit, eh? Nice style

 

[AmericanFirst]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

Probably not because socialists support socialists.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

Lame Dave. Very very, very very, very very, very, very,


VERY FRACKING LAME


You cannot rebut the illegal nature of the law, it violated the "Open Meetings" Laws of Wisconsin. So, what does davey do? Why lacking a cogent, logical, supportable argument he does what any good low life scum sucking "Proud ConJob" (IF there is such an animal, which I doubt) do? He attempts to deflect or misdirect the argument so as to not be able to answer the question or address the issue at hand.

F+ for content. F++ for lameness.

Wow, you are so fracking lame.

Obamaturd violates the constitution and you pukes praise him, and then cry when a republican gov. fights the socialism called unions. Idiots.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

apples and oranges. the law requires that the bill be published for a certain amount of time before it was acted upon. they got arrogant and desperate and violated it.

obama made a campaign promise. nice. but not legally enforceable. that said, there's still far more transparency than the prior 8 years. you can agree or not. but that's how i see it. (although that isn't what this thread is about so i'd rather not offtrack it).

all of that being the case, it will be interesting to see what happens on appeal.

Offtrack or not you brought it up. Bush is still a better potus than obamaturd ever will be, he was also more transparent. Obamaturd is an embarrassment.

 

[Wiseacre]

So a democrat district judge does what she's told, big deal. It'll go up to the Wisconsin Supreme Court where they'll rule one way or another. If they overturn it, the state legislature will just redo it, isn't this kind of wasting time? Political posturing, we'll see if it helps the Dems next november. Doubt it.

 

[daveman]

Lame Dave. Very very, very very, very very, very, very,


VERY FRACKING LAME


You cannot rebut the illegal nature of the law, it violated the "Open Meetings" Laws of Wisconsin. So, what does davey do? Why lacking a cogent, logical, supportable argument he does what any good low life scum sucking "Proud ConJob" (IF there is such an animal, which I doubt) do? He attempts to deflect or misdirect the argument so as to not be able to answer the question or address the issue at hand.

F+ for content. F++ for lameness.

Wow, you are so fracking lame.

So...Obama gets a pass.

He can do no wrong, huh?

If in doubt, repeat the same bullshit, eh? Nice style

No bullshit. He refuses to hold Obama accountable.

How 'bout you?

 

[daveman]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

Probably not because socialists support socialists.

No enemies on the left. If Hitler held up a protest sign reading "Bush = Hitler!!", they'd slap him on the back.

 

[beowolfe]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

Don't know the difference betwween a 'pledge' and a 'law'. Typical.

 

[beowolfe]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

Lame Dave. Very very, very very, very very, very, very,


VERY FRACKING LAME


You cannot rebut the illegal nature of the law, it violated the "Open Meetings" Laws of Wisconsin. So, what does davey do? Why lacking a cogent, logical, supportable argument he does what any good low life scum sucking "Proud ConJob" (IF there is such an animal, which I doubt) do? He attempts to deflect or misdirect the argument so as to not be able to answer the question or address the issue at hand.

F+ for content. F++ for lameness.

Wow, you are so fracking lame.

Obamaturd violates the constitution and you pukes praise him, and then cry when a republican gov. fights the socialism called unions. Idiots.

you can't violate the constitution by not keeping a campaing pledge.

 

[BlindBoo]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

Since when does a campaign pledge equate to a law?

Has the Obama aAdministration broken any laws?

I think he will and has suffered in 2012 for not following his transparency pledge.

 

[daveman]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

Don't know the difference betwween a 'pledge' and a 'law'. Typical.

So Obama lied to you, and you're okay with it?

 

[daveman]

Are you similarly outraged over the Obama Administration's repeated violations of its transparency pledge?

Since when does a campaign pledge equate to a law?

Since when did I equate the two?

Has the Obama aAdministration broken any laws?

I think he will and has suffered in 2012 for not following his transparency pledge.

Hopefully.