Judaism 101

[Picaro]

Jews have always been a tiny minority everywhere but Israel. Since we are forbidden to proselytize, we will remain a small group. Most people know very
little about Judaism because they rarely meet many Jews and ask questions.
This website is presented for any of you who have questions. I will also answer
any questions you have.

It is important to understand that there are different denominations of Judaism whose practice of Judaism varies a bit.



Judaism 101

Isn't the ban on 'proselytizing' a relatively recent development historically? And is it Biblical or tribal in origin and intent?

It went into effect in AD100. It is part of rabbinic law.

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

What are you talking about?

Exactly what I said in my post. Have a specific question?

 

[Picaro]

The main reason Judaism is not a good religion to convert to is because a new convert would have to accept the Jewish teaching that Jesus of Nazareth was a conman and a charlatan.

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

you assume all kinds of idiotic things PIC------in the navy I learned this little
limerick ' A S S U M E makes an ASS out of U and ME . I this case it
is more like -----U (you) Jews never obsessed over genealogies or racial
purity (laws) It is my EDUCATED belief that the SEEKING OF CONVERTS
became outlawed in Judaism because this activity was a capital crime as declared by the various despots that invaded or ruled over jews. In fact CANON LAW---rendered the conversion of a Christian by a jew to Judaism a CAPITAL CRIME---
The Assyrians also outlawed it as do the muslims. The grain of truth to which
Pic desperately clings is that some of the prophets (like Ezra) distressed over the
frequent marriage by jews of "foreign women"----who brought their religion and
customs along with them-----this stuff was especially prevalent amongst jews living Elsewhere---whether by migration or exile. The big time "lesson" was
JEZEBEL. Ezra's approach was controversial back then and actually---interestingly enough----remains a bone of contention between some jewish groups that I will not mention. I am intimately involved with someone from that group

Nobody is asking you to contribute your usual pointless strawmen here, Rosie; we all already know you don't know jack about any of it. And you're also wrong, as usual. If you think your hopping around between many centuries is confusing anybody, you're also wrong, and it just makes you look that much more dishonest as well as ignorant.

Is anyone asking YOU to continue FARTING OUT YOUR STUPIDITY. In fact, if you knew anything about HISTORY-----you would know that there is no
JUMPING around on time periods in my posts. If you could pinpoint even one---you would be delighted to make a note of it. ROFLMAO @ pic's "we already know...." you got ANOTHER PIECE OF SHIT IN YOUR POCKET---PIC?

If any shit is in my pocket, it leaked out of your head and fell in. The fact you don't even know what you're doing is hilarious in itself.

I am interacting with an imbecile on the internet----a waste of time

Yes, you have nothing to contribute, you're too ignorant, so you are indeed wasting your time here. Go troll the Catlicks or something.

 

[irosie91]

Jews have always been a tiny minority everywhere but Israel. Since we are forbidden to proselytize, we will remain a small group. Most people know very
little about Judaism because they rarely meet many Jews and ask questions.
This website is presented for any of you who have questions. I will also answer
any questions you have.

It is important to understand that there are different denominations of Judaism whose practice of Judaism varies a bit.



Judaism 101

Isn't the ban on 'proselytizing' a relatively recent development historically? And is it Biblical or tribal in origin and intent?

It went into effect in AD100. It is part of rabbinic law.

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

What are you talking about?

??? I dont' know------I do not recall anything from Jonah regarding
what PIC terms "jewish exclusivity" He seems to be parroting something
from his catechism whore. As to ""RACIAL PURITY" ------??? and
genealolgies------WISHFUL THINKING ON THE PART OF THE
catechism whore------that and jewish recipes for cookies made from Christian
blood

 

[Indeependent]

Jews have always been a tiny minority everywhere but Israel. Since we are forbidden to proselytize, we will remain a small group. Most people know very
little about Judaism because they rarely meet many Jews and ask questions.
This website is presented for any of you who have questions. I will also answer
any questions you have.

It is important to understand that there are different denominations of Judaism whose practice of Judaism varies a bit.



Judaism 101

Isn't the ban on 'proselytizing' a relatively recent development historically? And is it Biblical or tribal in origin and intent?

It went into effect in AD100. It is part of rabbinic law.

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

What are you talking about?

Exactly what I said in my post. Have a specific question?

Have a Link?

 

[Indeependent]

Jews have always been a tiny minority everywhere but Israel. Since we are forbidden to proselytize, we will remain a small group. Most people know very
little about Judaism because they rarely meet many Jews and ask questions.
This website is presented for any of you who have questions. I will also answer
any questions you have.

It is important to understand that there are different denominations of Judaism whose practice of Judaism varies a bit.



Judaism 101

Isn't the ban on 'proselytizing' a relatively recent development historically? And is it Biblical or tribal in origin and intent?

It went into effect in AD100. It is part of rabbinic law.

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

What are you talking about?

??? I dont' know------I do not recall anything from Jonah regarding
what PIC terms "jewish exclusivity" He seems to be parroting something
from his catechism whore. As to ""RACIAL PURITY" ------??? and
genealolgies------WISHFUL THINKING ON THE PART OF THE
catechism whore------that and jewish recipes for cookies made from Christian
blood

Just attended a 3 part class on Yonah this winter.
I have no idea what Picaro is referring to.

 

[irosie91]

Jews have always been a tiny minority everywhere but Israel. Since we are forbidden to proselytize, we will remain a small group. Most people know very
little about Judaism because they rarely meet many Jews and ask questions.
This website is presented for any of you who have questions. I will also answer
any questions you have.

It is important to understand that there are different denominations of Judaism whose practice of Judaism varies a bit.



Judaism 101

Isn't the ban on 'proselytizing' a relatively recent development historically? And is it Biblical or tribal in origin and intent?

It went into effect in AD100. It is part of rabbinic law.

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

What are you talking about?

Exactly what I said in my post. Have a specific question?

you said nothing remotely logical in your posts-----just gibberish ----and example
"some jewish sects try to ban proselytism"------yeah? which one?

 

[Indeependent]

Isn't the ban on 'proselytizing' a relatively recent development historically? And is it Biblical or tribal in origin and intent?

It went into effect in AD100. It is part of rabbinic law.

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

What are you talking about?

Exactly what I said in my post. Have a specific question?

you said nothing remotely logical in your posts-----just gibberish ----and example
"some jewish sects try to ban proselytism"------yeah? which one?

Jews proselytize by telling non-Jews they’re not going to hell.

 

[irosie91]

It went into effect in AD100. It is part of rabbinic law.

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

What are you talking about?

Exactly what I said in my post. Have a specific question?

you said nothing remotely logical in your posts-----just gibberish ----and example
"some jewish sects try to ban proselytism"------yeah? which one?

Jews proselytize by telling non-Jews they’re not going to hell.

do you think THAT is the issue that annoyed the catechism whore?

 

[Indeependent]

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

What are you talking about?

Exactly what I said in my post. Have a specific question?

you said nothing remotely logical in your posts-----just gibberish ----and example
"some jewish sects try to ban proselytism"------yeah? which one?

Jews proselytize by telling non-Jews they’re not going to hell.

do you think THAT is the issue that annoyed the catechism whore?

Almost all non-Jews I meet are shocked that they’re not going to hell.
They’re taught lots of bullshit about Judaism.

 

[irosie91]

What are you talking about?

Exactly what I said in my post. Have a specific question?

you said nothing remotely logical in your posts-----just gibberish ----and example
"some jewish sects try to ban proselytism"------yeah? which one?

Jews proselytize by telling non-Jews they’re not going to hell.

do you think THAT is the issue that annoyed the catechism whore?

Almost all non-Jews I meet are shocked that they’re not going to hell.
They’re taught lots of bullshit about Judaism.

more WISHFUL THINKING I have to admit-----catholic hell is a
really EXCITING PLACE. I read all about it in a book---THE DIVINE
COMEDY. the comic part is how DULL IS PARADISE

 

[Picaro]

Isn't the ban on 'proselytizing' a relatively recent development historically? And is it Biblical or tribal in origin and intent?

It went into effect in AD100. It is part of rabbinic law.

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

What are you talking about?

??? I dont' know------I do not recall anything from Jonah regarding
what PIC terms "jewish exclusivity" He seems to be parroting something
from his catechism whore. As to ""RACIAL PURITY" ------??? and
genealolgies------WISHFUL THINKING ON THE PART OF THE
catechism whore------that and jewish recipes for cookies made from Christian
blood

Just attended a 3 part class on Yonah this winter.
I have no idea what Picaro is referring to.

Must have been a lousy class.

Some highlights of Jonah:

'A snide commentary on prophetic calling,

A criticism of Israeli prophets and their insincerity at preaching repentance, not really wanting to see it, and being disappointed, taking it as a personal failure when destructive judgement is not dished out by God,

An implicit criticism of the Jewish community, which was generally unwilling to respond to prophetic calls to repentance, in contrast to willingness of Nineveh, including king, people, and even cattle, who responded immediately in faith.

A criticism of an exclusionary Jewish belief in Divine election, that they were God's only concern and no one else

An assertion of God's freedom to change his mind,

Pointing out that the words of true prophets do not always come true.'

It reads as a satire on Jewish culture and vanity

 

[Picaro]

It went into effect in AD100. It is part of rabbinic law.

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

What are you talking about?

Exactly what I said in my post. Have a specific question?

you said nothing remotely logical in your posts-----just gibberish ----and example
"some jewish sects try to ban proselytism"------yeah? which one?

Jews proselytize by telling non-Jews they’re not going to hell.

Jews have actively proselytized in their history; claiming otherwise is just ignorant. they stopped forcing conversion at points, true, but still accepted converts in droves, not making it hard until late in their history, hence the reference in Jonah and other places. From post- exilic times down to Jesus's time they developed 'racial purity' laws that would make Nazis jealous by the Roman conquests. Your genealogy even determined where one was permitted to go in the Temple and Temple grounds themselves, and of course what priest posts one could qualify for.

 

[Picaro]

Many Jews are desperate to hide their racist problems in the 'community' form 'outsiders', but that taboo is changing, especially with the hard core racist Chassidics become some 12% of Jews who identify as Jews, and Israel's recent stupidity in making these cult members officers and recruits in the IDF. That is a disaster waiting to happen, since most of them aren't even supporters of the state, just obnoxious parasites. the loons are just as likely to defect to Hamas as fight for the state.

 

[irosie91]

It went into effect in AD100. It is part of rabbinic law.

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

What are you talking about?

??? I dont' know------I do not recall anything from Jonah regarding
what PIC terms "jewish exclusivity" He seems to be parroting something
from his catechism whore. As to ""RACIAL PURITY" ------??? and
genealolgies------WISHFUL THINKING ON THE PART OF THE
catechism whore------that and jewish recipes for cookies made from Christian
blood

Just attended a 3 part class on Yonah this winter.
I have no idea what Picaro is referring to.

Must have been a lousy class.

Some highlights of Jonah:

'A snide commentary on prophetic calling,

A criticism of Israeli prophets and their insincerity at preaching repentance, not really wanting to see it, and being disappointed, taking it as a personal failure when destructive judgement is not dished out by God,

An implicit criticism of the Jewish community, which was generally unwilling to respond to prophetic calls to repentance, in contrast to willingness of Nineveh, including king, people, and even cattle, who responded immediately in faith.

A criticism of an exclusionary Jewish belief in Divine election, that they were God's only concern and no one else

An assertion of God's freedom to change his mind,

Pointing out that the words of true prophets do not always come true.'

It reads as a satire on Jewish culture and vanity

Pic-----your catechism whore had just discovered that the Inquisition
which oversaw the torture of jews was functionally ended in the 19th century.
She was HEARTBROKEN and took it out on Jonah

 

[irosie91]

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

What are you talking about?

Exactly what I said in my post. Have a specific question?

you said nothing remotely logical in your posts-----just gibberish ----and example
"some jewish sects try to ban proselytism"------yeah? which one?

Jews proselytize by telling non-Jews they’re not going to hell.

Jews have actively proselytized in their history; claiming otherwise is just ignorant. they stopped forcing conversion at points, true, but still accepted converts in droves, not making it hard until late in their history, hence the reference in Jonah and other places. From post- exilic times down to Jesus's time they developed 'racial purity' laws that would make Nazis jealous by the Roman conquests. Your genealogy even determined where one was permitted to go in the Temple and Temple grounds themselves, and of course what priest posts one could qualify for.

oh gee-----more shit from the catechism whore-------REALITY check---there was a very short time during which the jews of the HASMONEAN era OVERLY URGED the people of EDOM to convert to Judaism once Judea conquered Edom (edom ---which is said to be the descendants of ESAU (ie----technically already "children of ISRAEL"-----ie Israelites" ) had drifted. Edom and Judea were in conflict for decades. Beyond that jews ---unlike catholics-----did not engage in forced proselytizing. There was a more prolonged period of time when greek and to a less extent extent, roman intellecturals, were very attracted to Judaism and-----did convert in significant numbers. Some "prophets" ----(ezra is an example) were very concerned about the introduction of "alien ideas and customs and practices INTRODUCED by casual converts---- Poor pic is a victim of a catechism whore with severe dysmenorrhea. As to
Pic's discussion as to "WHERE ONE COULD GO" in the temple -----his comment is far too garbled and idiotic to address. "PRIEST" in Judaism is restricted to SPECIFIC PEOPLE------to wit---descendants of AARON ----
the brother of Moses. called COHANIM People like me---LEVITES---play the flute and ----sweep up and eat lamb. Saint Magda Goebbels-----wife of catholic high priest Josef
Goebbels fed her children cyanide

 

[irosie91]

Many Jews are desperate to hide their racist problems in the 'community' form 'outsiders', but that taboo is changing, especially with the hard core racist Chassidics become some 12% of Jews who identify as Jews, and Israel's recent stupidity in making these cult members officers and recruits in the IDF. That is a disaster waiting to happen, since most of them aren't even supporters of the state, just obnoxious parasites. the loons are just as likely to defect to Hamas as fight for the state.

Pic got this information ^^^^^^ from his catechism whore who acted as
a procurer amongst altar boys in his very own church. The good news is that
Pic was not an altar boy------but the catechism whore LIKED HIM LOTS

 

[irosie91]

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

What are you talking about?

Exactly what I said in my post. Have a specific question?

you said nothing remotely logical in your posts-----just gibberish ----and example
"some jewish sects try to ban proselytism"------yeah? which one?

Jews proselytize by telling non-Jews they’re not going to hell.

Jews have actively proselytized in their history; claiming otherwise is just ignorant. they stopped forcing conversion at points, true, but still accepted converts in droves, not making it hard until late in their history, hence the reference in Jonah and other places. From post- exilic times down to Jesus's time they developed 'racial purity' laws that would make Nazis jealous by the Roman conquests. Your genealogy even determined where one was permitted to go in the Temple and Temple grounds themselves, and of course what priest posts one could qualify for.

the temple grounds were and ARE opened to everyone------even pic and his catechism whore. Priest is confined to the tribe LEVI and specifically to the
descendants of Aaron. There are levites all over the place. This designation confuses Pic no end

 

[irosie91]

Pic is attempting to prove that his fellow Nazis are like Jesus----NOT TRUE---
Jesus was a PHARISEE

 

[irosie91]

Many Jews are desperate to hide their racist problems in the 'community' form 'outsiders', but that taboo is changing, especially with the hard core racist Chassidics become some 12% of Jews who identify as Jews, and Israel's recent stupidity in making these cult members officers and recruits in the IDF. That is a disaster waiting to happen, since most of them aren't even supporters of the state, just obnoxious parasites. the loons are just as likely to defect to Hamas as fight for the state.

of which "race" are the "chassidics" members? Which "race" do they
oppose? Have you ever been in the same room with a "Chassidic"
pic??

 

[irosie91]

It went into effect in AD100. It is part of rabbinic law.

That is indeed relatively recent . We find the Prophet Jonah cautioning against Jewish exclusivity, supposedly in the 8th Century B.C., but during the 'Persian' period we see Jews impressing a lot of non-Jews re the events that the Purim holidays celebrate, generating a lot new converts, so I had the impression it was only some Jewish sects that concerned themselves with trying to ban proselytism as a policy, and that it was mainly post-exile Babylonian Jews that obsess over genealogies and 'racial purity' laws. I assumed it was the general 'permanent' case by the 2nd Century B.C.

What are you talking about?

??? I dont' know------I do not recall anything from Jonah regarding
what PIC terms "jewish exclusivity" He seems to be parroting something
from his catechism whore. As to ""RACIAL PURITY" ------??? and
genealolgies------WISHFUL THINKING ON THE PART OF THE
catechism whore------that and jewish recipes for cookies made from Christian
blood

Just attended a 3 part class on Yonah this winter.
I have no idea what Picaro is referring to.

Must have been a lousy class.

Some highlights of Jonah:

'A snide commentary on prophetic calling,

from rosey Pic, Please cite the lines in YONAH which indicate to
your catechism whore that the book is a snide commentary on "prophetic
calling"



A criticism of Israeli prophets and their insincerity at preaching repentance, not really wanting to see it, and being disappointed, taking it as a personal failure when destructive judgement is not dished out by God,

Please cite the lines in Yonah which , according to your catechism
whore, constitute a "criticism of Israeli prophets"

An implicit criticism of the Jewish community, which was generally unwilling to respond to prophetic calls to repentance, in contrast to willingness of Nineveh, including king, people, and even cattle, who responded immediately in faith.

IMPLICIT???

A criticism of an exclusionary Jewish belief in Divine election, that they were God's only concern and no one else

from rosey who wrote da book according to your catechism whore?

An assertion of God's freedom to change his mind,

^^^ ???? who is asserting?

Pointing out that the words of true prophets do not always come true.'

"da words come true'"

It reads as a satire on Jewish culture and vanity

"cite the verses, please"