Journalists Behaving Badly. The Rush To frame The Whistleblower Story To Help Trump

[Crepitus]

Another day, another attempted diversion from the fact that the "whistlblower" has absolutely no first-hand info on the matter.

And another tree-fiddy to the OP from Daily Kooks, for spreading their agitprop Spam.

How would you know?

 

[edward37]

Trump has 2 cards to play ,,,First the Putin card asking for help from a foreign nation and secondly The Hillary card Lie about Biden and keep repeating the lie He knows his base will swallow whatever crap he throws

 

[sealybobo]

Donald Trump withheld aid to a United States ally in order to force that ally into providing him with ammunition he could use against a potential opponent in the 2020 election. That’s the story. Full stop. There are no circumstances in which what Trump has done are in any sense acceptable. The only option is for Congress to immediately begin impeachment. Not an inquiry into whether there should be an inquiry. Impeachment.

You may yet see it. The Democrats are as stupid as they are ridiculous. With their current bend toward political seppuku, it is well within the bounds of possibility.

Democrats are smart. They don’t need to appeal to me. I’m going to vote democratic no matter who gets the nod.

They need kids. They need poor people to start showing up to vote.

They need pro choices to show up.

They need diversity voters to show up.

They need people with no healthcare to show up.

They need pro lgbt people to show up. Trump won’t let them serve

And if you don’t want trump starting a war show up

 

[Oddball]

The "journalists behaving badly" here are the agitprop hacks lending credibility to a "whistleblower" who has absolutely no first-hand information of any kind....But that hasn't stopped the absolutely DNC stooges disguised as "journalists" from running with the story anyway.

 

[whitehall]

The last republican the N.Y. Times endorsed was Eisenhower. Lefties took over the once venerable newspaper and turned it into something akin to the National Enquirer.

 

[B. Kidd]

Donald Trump withheld aid to a United States ally in order to force that ally into providing him with ammunition he could use against a potential opponent in the 2020 election. That’s the story. Full stop. There are no circumstances in which what Trump has done are in any sense acceptable. The only option is for Congress to immediately begin impeachment. Not an inquiry into whether there should be an inquiry. Impeachment.

You may yet see it. The Democrats are as stupid as they are ridiculous. With their current bend toward political seppuku, it is well within the bounds of possibility.

Democrats are smart. They don’t need to appeal to me. I’m going to vote democratic no matter who gets the nod.

They need kids. They need poor people to start showing up to vote.

They need pro choices to show up.

They need diversity voters to show up.

They need people with no healthcare to show up.

They need pro lgbt people to show up. Trump won’t let them serve

And if you don’t want trump starting a war show up

Damn the Dems are needy. Real needy.

 

[Oddball]

Another day, another attempted diversion from the fact that the "whistlblower" has absolutely no first-hand info on the matter.

And another tree-fiddy to the OP from Daily Kooks, for spreading their agitprop Spam.

How would you know?

Because fucking CNN reported it, dumb shit.

 

[22lcidw]

Donald Trump withheld aid to a United States ally in order to force that ally into providing him with ammunition he could use against a potential opponent in the 2020 election. That’s the story. Full stop. There are no circumstances in which what Trump has done are in any sense acceptable. The only option is for Congress to immediately begin impeachment. Not an inquiry into whether there should be an inquiry. Impeachment.

Journalists behaving badly—the rush to frame the whistleblower story to help Trump

If Republicans are going to continue aiding him on this one.

YES Force the republican pond scum into voting to keep their dictator in office

The scum is at least on the top. Your debris runs deep.

 

[edward37]

Donald Trump withheld aid to a United States ally in order to force that ally into providing him with ammunition he could use against a potential opponent in the 2020 election. That’s the story. Full stop. There are no circumstances in which what Trump has done are in any sense acceptable. The only option is for Congress to immediately begin impeachment. Not an inquiry into whether there should be an inquiry. Impeachment.

Journalists behaving badly—the rush to frame the whistleblower story to help Trump

If Republicans are going to continue aiding him on this one.

YES Force the republican pond scum into voting to keep their dictator in office

The scum is at least on the top. Your debris runs deep.

You really can't tell the guy is a low life liar ,a bully a scum sucking dog ? Hey if that's your choice I'd love seeing other choices you've made

 

[Crepitus]

Another day, another attempted diversion from the fact that the "whistlblower" has absolutely no first-hand info on the matter.

And another tree-fiddy to the OP from Daily Kooks, for spreading their agitprop Spam.

How would you know?

Because fucking CNN reported it, dumb shit.

CNN has talked to the whistleblower and found out he has no first hand information?

Link?

Or are you lying.

Again.

 

[B. Kidd]

Donald Trump withheld aid to a United States ally in order to force that ally into providing him with ammunition he could use against a potential opponent in the 2020 election. That’s the story. Full stop. There are no circumstances in which what Trump has done are in any sense acceptable. The only option is for Congress to immediately begin impeachment. Not an inquiry into whether there should be an inquiry. Impeachment.

Journalists behaving badly—the rush to frame the whistleblower story to help Trump

If Republicans are going to continue aiding him on this one.

YES Force the republican pond scum into voting to keep their dictator in office

The scum is at least on the top. Your debris runs deep.

You really can't tell the guy is a low life liar ,a bully a scum sucking dog ? Hey if that's your choice I'd love seeing other choices you've made

That's what it takes to counter unhinged Progressives!
And Trump is doing a stellar job at that.

 

[Lesh]

Another day, another attempted diversion from the fact that the "whistlblower" has absolutely no first-hand info on the matter.

And another tree-fiddy to the OP from Daily Kooks, for spreading their agitprop Spam.

How would you know?

Because fucking CNN reported it, dumb shit.

Really? Care to post that link?

 

[Oddball]

Another day, another attempted diversion from the fact that the "whistlblower" has absolutely no first-hand info on the matter.

And another tree-fiddy to the OP from Daily Kooks, for spreading their agitprop Spam.

How would you know?

Because fucking CNN reported it, dumb shit.

Really? Care to post that link?

. The alleged whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications that partly prompted the complaint to the inspector general, an official briefed on the matter told CNN on Thursday.

Intel Inspector General suggested whistleblower had concerns about multiple actions - CNNPolitics

 

[Crepitus]

Another day, another attempted diversion from the fact that the "whistlblower" has absolutely no first-hand info on the matter.

And another tree-fiddy to the OP from Daily Kooks, for spreading their agitprop Spam.

How would you know?

Because fucking CNN reported it, dumb shit.

Really? Care to post that link?

. The alleged whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications that partly prompted the complaint to the inspector general, an official briefed on the matter told CNN on Thursday.
Intel Inspector General suggested whistleblower had concerns about multiple actions - CNNPolitics

You left out the part where the whistleblowers attourny refuted that.

 

[Dana7360]

Donald Trump withheld aid to a United States ally in order to force that ally into providing him with ammunition he could use against a potential opponent in the 2020 election. That’s the story. Full stop. There are no circumstances in which what Trump has done are in any sense acceptable. The only option is for Congress to immediately begin impeachment. Not an inquiry into whether there should be an inquiry. Impeachment.

Journalists behaving badly—the rush to frame the whistleblower story to help Trump

If Republicans are going to continue aiding him on this one.

What's the point in impeaching him if the senate won't convict?

All it will do is give trump ammunition. He can run around saying it's all a hoax and the democrats are out to get him.

Let the American people throw him out of office next year. Expose all his lies, crimes and theft then let the American people vote.

If the election is honest there's no way that man can be reelected.

The worst thing that can happen to trump is the American people rejecting him and throwing him out of office.

Then the prosecutions can start.

 

[blackhawk]

Source Daily Kook enough said. Anyway sure glad the media didn't rush to frame the recent Kavanaugh story in a way to help Democrats you know the one the one the alleged victim didn't recall and the person telling the story didn't witness but was telling a story they heard second hand.

 

[Lesh]

To NOT impeach shows acceptance...of behavior we can NOT have repeated or (god forbid) continue

 

[Oddball]

Source Daily Kook enough said. Anyway sure glad the media didn't rush to frame the recent Kavanaugh story in a way to help Democrats you know the one the one the alleged victim didn't recall and the person telling the story didn't witness but was telling a story they heard second hand.

Funny thing is, this story is also based upon second-hand information, as reported by CNN no less.

It's as though the moonbats have been going out of their way to ignore these little facts.

 

[Lesh]

Another day, another attempted diversion from the fact that the "whistlblower" has absolutely no first-hand info on the matter.

And another tree-fiddy to the OP from Daily Kooks, for spreading their agitprop Spam.

How would you know?

Because fucking CNN reported it, dumb shit.

Really? Care to post that link?

. The alleged whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications that partly prompted the complaint to the inspector general, an official briefed on the matter told CNN on Thursday.

Intel Inspector General suggested whistleblower had concerns about multiple actions - CNNPolitics

From YOUR link

The whistleblower's attorney, Andrew Bakaj, had no comment when asked about the claim that the individual did not have direct knowledge of the communication in question. When asked if the complaint deals with Ukraine, Bakaj again had no comment.


A source close to the whistleblower's legal team pushed back strongly against the assertion that the intelligence Community's Inspector General would accept "third-hand disclosures" and that what the official "outlined about lack of personal knowledge and not within their course of work seems like the beginning of a smear by those trying to discredit the whistleblower."

Froggie is a liar (and a sloppy one at that). What a surprise

 

[Dana7360]

Another day, another attempted diversion from the fact that the "whistlblower" has absolutely no first-hand info on the matter.

And another tree-fiddy to the OP from Daily Kooks, for spreading their agitprop Spam.

How would you know?

Because fucking CNN reported it, dumb shit.

CNN has talked to the whistleblower and found out he has no first hand information?

Link?

Or are you lying.

Again.

The person is lying.

I just did a search on it.

Nothing came up.