Jorge Ramos fact of the day

[bendog]

He's a belligerent, radical left-wing activist, not a journalist.

I would think you find radical left wing activist synonymous with journalist

 

[bedowin62]

g5000

"every day" you're going to come here thinking you're putting me in my place. and every day i'm going to make you look stupid reminding you in front of everybody here that YOU are the one making blanket statements about whole groups, which is, of course, exactly what you want to lecture others about.

and you look like a mental case that way

 

[whitehall]

He is an angry left winger who wants to make a media splash by confronting Trump but he doesn't have the intellectual ability and ends up coming off like a petulant child.

 

[kiwiman127]

Let's see, the GOP will heavily lose the Hispanic vote, the woman's vote, the black vote along with the Asian vote and I'm sure there are some non-angry white guys who will vote too.
It will be interesting how the GOP wins in 2016

 

[bedowin62]

He is an angry left winger who wants to make a media splash by confronting Trump but he doesn't have the intellectual ability and ends up coming off like a petulant child.

i hope the Left continues this practice and i'm pretty sure they will.

they learned nothing in the mid-term elections and dismissed their losses as caused by dis-interested voters on their own side. i think Americans are tires of the Left's idea of "change" as witnessed by the race relations set back decades by progressive pandering, the wave of illegals Democrats want to make legal FOR VOTES, AND the general way the Left seems to despise our very institutions

 

[bedowin62]

Let's see, the GOP will heavily lose the Hispanic vote, the woman's vote, the black vote along with the Asian vote and I'm sure there are some non-angry white guys who will vote too.
It will be interesting how the GOP wins in 2016

why would the GOP lose the Hispanic vote? what did Trump say that isnt true?

 

[bedowin62]

why would the GOP lose the black vote? who will suffer the most when 15 million or so mostly Hispanic illegals are made legal? the Black unemployment rate is hovering just under TWICE WHITE UNEMPLOYMENT, and higher than Hispanic unemployment.. Tell me how that is going to improve if Dems get their amnesty?

 

[bedowin62]

why would the GOP lose the woman vote? do you REALLY think American woman are outraged because they need the government to subsidize their sex lives and consequences of that?

 

[bedowin62]

why would the GOP lose the Asian vote? the Left mainly despises Asians because they dont ask for much, and cant be eslaved in dependency

 

[bedowin62]

what are "non-angry white guys"????

dudes too stupid to know they are being used as dupes and useful idiots; voting for people that dont see much of a future in their Party for them???

 

[Buzz Jenkins]

Ramos is an angry and cocky little beaner who genuinely feels that America owes the world. He should be worried about stamping out corruption in Mexico and Central America, improving their economies and making their part of the world some place where they want to stay.

You must be one of those LBJ Democrats I hear so much about.


Soggy in NOLA bedowin62

Every. Single. Day.

YAWN
cuz one comment condemns whole groups

you lost your case long ago; but you're too mentally-ill and far to small of a person to admit it

Just providing you the evidence you asked for when I said that whenever a right winger is talking about a minority, it is always in a negative light.

Every. Single. Day.

And it wasn't just that post I quoted. This very topic was started to attack a very well-known and beloved member of the Hispanic community.

So go ahead and yawn and put yourself in a self-induced coma. I know why you deniers do that. It's a defensive thing. You need to preserve your "because gifts" delusion rather than face the reality that it is because every single time a right winger talks about a minority, it is in a negative light.

And you deniers are enabling it.

Minorities notice shit like that, and that is why they will not vote for a party which so clearly HATES them.

By your absolute refusal to clean up these shitbags, and your attacks on those who are trying to, by your very denial that the blazingly obvious problem exists, you are part and parcel of that bigotry.

You might not be the guy who throws the darkies in the oven. You're way too cowardly for that. You're a villager who puts a handkerchief over his mouth and nose to cover up the stench and then says, "I have no idea what you are talking about."

So I am going to be rubbing your nose in it for a while, you cowardly willfully blind enabler.

i'll clean up the "shitbags" when you are man enough to "clean up" a thousand left-wing idiots making blind accusations against ALL Republicans on a daily basis............................

BUT WAIT!! YOU CANT DO THAT; YOU'RE ONE OF THEM!!

you're simply a laughable clown dude

You people are hilarious! Most of the time I cannot even tell who is on the left and who is on the right because most of the time nobody is making any fucking sense! Ha ha ha ha!!!!!! Plus, with these ridiculous thread formats many times you cannot tell who is replying to who. This is a pure clusterfuck!!!!

 

[Buzz Jenkins]

why would the GOP lose the Asian vote? the Left mainly despises Asians because they dont ask for much, and cant be eslaved in dependency

The Asian vote?

 

[bedowin62]

Ramos is an angry and cocky little beaner who genuinely feels that America owes the world. He should be worried about stamping out corruption in Mexico and Central America, improving their economies and making their part of the world some place where they want to stay.

You must be one of those LBJ Democrats I hear so much about.


Soggy in NOLA bedowin62

Every. Single. Day.

YAWN
cuz one comment condemns whole groups

you lost your case long ago; but you're too mentally-ill and far to small of a person to admit it

Just providing you the evidence you asked for when I said that whenever a right winger is talking about a minority, it is always in a negative light.

Every. Single. Day.

And it wasn't just that post I quoted. This very topic was started to attack a very well-known and beloved member of the Hispanic community.

So go ahead and yawn and put yourself in a self-induced coma. I know why you deniers do that. It's a defensive thing. You need to preserve your "because gifts" delusion rather than face the reality that it is because every single time a right winger talks about a minority, it is in a negative light.

And you deniers are enabling it.

Minorities notice shit like that, and that is why they will not vote for a party which so clearly HATES them.

By your absolute refusal to clean up these shitbags, and your attacks on those who are trying to, by your very denial that the blazingly obvious problem exists, you are part and parcel of that bigotry.

You might not be the guy who throws the darkies in the oven. You're way too cowardly for that. You're a villager who puts a handkerchief over his mouth and nose to cover up the stench and then says, "I have no idea what you are talking about."

So I am going to be rubbing your nose in it for a while, you cowardly willfully blind enabler.

i'll clean up the "shitbags" when you are man enough to "clean up" a thousand left-wing idiots making blind accusations against ALL Republicans on a daily basis............................

BUT WAIT!! YOU CANT DO THAT; YOU'RE ONE OF THEM!!

you're simply a laughable clown dude

You people are hilarious! Most of the time I cannot even tell who is on the left and who is on the right because most of the time nobody is making any fucking sense! Ha ha ha ha!!!!!! Plus, with these ridiculous thread formats many times you cannot tell who is replying to who. This is a pure clusterfuck!!!!

um ok; but poster g5000 knows i'm talking about him. dont you g?????

 

[Iceweasel]

Ramos is the most popular media figure in the US among Hispanic-Americans.

This is politics, some of you seem to forget. This is about who votes for whom in the election. If over 3/4s of Hispanics vote for the Democratic nominee, it is all but mathematically impossible for the Republican to win.

Go down with your ship if you wish, but remember we told you so.

Yep, Republicans lost their ass last November. Good point. Now go hug your bong.

 

[kiwiman127]

Bedowin, because current polls show the groups I listed have a strong unfavorable view of Trump. Not just unfavorable but a "strong" unfavorable view of Trump.
Enough said.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Ramos is the most popular media figure in the US among Hispanic-Americans.

This is politics, some of you seem to forget. This is about who votes for whom in the election. If over 3/4s of Hispanics vote for the Democratic nominee, it is all but mathematically impossible for the Republican to win.

Go down with your ship if you wish, but remember we told you so.

No. Sorry, regurgitating something you read on dingbat sites is not going to cut it:

What share of the Hispanic vote do Republicans need to win in 2016? Is it 44 percent, as some have argued? Is it 49 percent? Or maybe it is as low as 33 percent?

If you’ve followed debates about elections for the past few years, you’ve probably heard analysts give answers to these questions. But the truth is, none of these answers are clearly correct. The reasons are threefold: First, these sorts of projections often hold all else equal from 2012 – that is, they assume that the white, black and Asian vote shares won’t move. Second, the projections offered typically involve the shares of the Hispanic vote (or that of other groups) that Republicans would need to win in order to take the popular vote. But, of course, our elections are determined by the Electoral College, and as we’ll see, Hispanic voters are much less relevant for the Electoral College than the popular vote.

Demographics and the 2016 Election Scenarios | RealClearPolitics

Nothing in that gibberish produces a plausible scenario with the GOP losing 75% of the Hispanic vote.

Read the Goddamned thing before talking out of your ass.

I reset the black vote to normal historical levels of 11% for GOP.

I raised the Hispanic vote until the GOP was ahead in the popular vote. It had to go to 43%.

It's up to you to come up with plausible changes in the other figures if you want to show the GOP winning with 25% of the Hispanic vote.

YOU go to the chart,

set the Hispanic vote at 25% and then juggle the other numbers until you get the GOP ahead.

Then make the case that your juggled numbers are plausible outcomes in 2016.

Try moving the white vote.

Ramos is the most popular media figure in the US among Hispanic-Americans.

This is politics, some of you seem to forget. This is about who votes for whom in the election. If over 3/4s of Hispanics vote for the Democratic nominee, it is all but mathematically impossible for the Republican to win.

Go down with your ship if you wish, but remember we told you so.

No. Sorry, regurgitating something you read on dingbat sites is not going to cut it:

What share of the Hispanic vote do Republicans need to win in 2016? Is it 44 percent, as some have argued? Is it 49 percent? Or maybe it is as low as 33 percent?

If you’ve followed debates about elections for the past few years, you’ve probably heard analysts give answers to these questions. But the truth is, none of these answers are clearly correct. The reasons are threefold: First, these sorts of projections often hold all else equal from 2012 – that is, they assume that the white, black and Asian vote shares won’t move. Second, the projections offered typically involve the shares of the Hispanic vote (or that of other groups) that Republicans would need to win in order to take the popular vote. But, of course, our elections are determined by the Electoral College, and as we’ll see, Hispanic voters are much less relevant for the Electoral College than the popular vote.

Demographics and the 2016 Election Scenarios | RealClearPolitics

Nothing in that gibberish produces a plausible scenario with the GOP losing 75% of the Hispanic vote.

Read the Goddamned thing before talking out of your ass.

I reset the black vote to normal historical levels of 11% for GOP.

I raised the Hispanic vote until the GOP was ahead in the popular vote. It had to go to 43%.

It's up to you to come up with plausible changes in the other figures if you want to show the GOP winning with 25% of the Hispanic vote.

YOU go to the chart,

set the Hispanic vote at 25% and then juggle the other numbers until you get the GOP ahead.

Then make the case that your juggled numbers are plausible outcomes in 2016.

Try moving the white vote.

You need 80% turnout of the non-Hispanic white vote at the R vs. D share ratio in order to put the GOP ahead in the popular vote

at GOP getting 11% Black and 25% Hispanic.

Not gonna happen.

 

[Buzz Jenkins]

Ramos is the most popular media figure in the US among Hispanic-Americans.

This is politics, some of you seem to forget. This is about who votes for whom in the election. If over 3/4s of Hispanics vote for the Democratic nominee, it is all but mathematically impossible for the Republican to win.

Go down with your ship if you wish, but remember we told you so.

Yep, Republicans lost their ass last November. Good point. Now go hug your bong.

Ha ha ha!!!

 

[NYcarbineer]

Ramos is the most popular media figure in the US among Hispanic-Americans.

This is politics, some of you seem to forget. This is about who votes for whom in the election. If over 3/4s of Hispanics vote for the Democratic nominee, it is all but mathematically impossible for the Republican to win.

Go down with your ship if you wish, but remember we told you so.

Yep, Republicans lost their ass last November. Good point. Now go hug your bong.

Democrats lost in 2010 too remember? That's why we have President Romney.

 

[g5000]

Ramos is an angry and cocky little beaner who genuinely feels that America owes the world. He should be worried about stamping out corruption in Mexico and Central America, improving their economies and making their part of the world some place where they want to stay.

You must be one of those LBJ Democrats I hear so much about.


Soggy in NOLA bedowin62

Every. Single. Day.

YAWN
cuz one comment condemns whole groups

you lost your case long ago; but you're too mentally-ill and far to small of a person to admit it

Just providing you the evidence you asked for when I said that whenever a right winger is talking about a minority, it is always in a negative light.

Every. Single. Day.

And it wasn't just that post I quoted. This very topic was started to attack a very well-known and beloved member of the Hispanic community.

So go ahead and yawn and put yourself in a self-induced coma. I know why you deniers do that. It's a defensive thing. You need to preserve your "because gifts" delusion rather than face the reality that it is because every single time a right winger talks about a minority, it is in a negative light.

And you deniers are enabling it.

Minorities notice shit like that, and that is why they will not vote for a party which so clearly HATES them.

By your absolute refusal to clean up these shitbags, and your attacks on those who are trying to, by your very denial that the blazingly obvious problem exists, you are part and parcel of that bigotry.

You might not be the guy who throws the darkies in the oven. You're way too cowardly for that. You're a villager who puts a handkerchief over his mouth and nose to cover up the stench and then says, "I have no idea what you are talking about."

So I am going to be rubbing your nose in it for a while, you cowardly willfully blind enabler.

i'll clean up the "shitbags" when you are man enough to "clean up" a thousand left-wing idiots making blind accusations against ALL Republicans on a daily basis............................

BUT WAIT!! YOU CANT DO THAT; YOU'RE ONE OF THEM!!

you're simply a laughable clown dude

Let the Left clean up its own mess. It's to our advantage if they don't.

And the Right needs to clean up its side of the street. If we don't, that is to the Left's advantage.

Too bad you are too unbelievably self-deluded to see this.

 

[Meathead]

No. Sorry, regurgitating something you read on dingbat sites is not going to cut it:

What share of the Hispanic vote do Republicans need to win in 2016? Is it 44 percent, as some have argued? Is it 49 percent? Or maybe it is as low as 33 percent?

If you’ve followed debates about elections for the past few years, you’ve probably heard analysts give answers to these questions. But the truth is, none of these answers are clearly correct. The reasons are threefold: First, these sorts of projections often hold all else equal from 2012 – that is, they assume that the white, black and Asian vote shares won’t move. Second, the projections offered typically involve the shares of the Hispanic vote (or that of other groups) that Republicans would need to win in order to take the popular vote. But, of course, our elections are determined by the Electoral College, and as we’ll see, Hispanic voters are much less relevant for the Electoral College than the popular vote.

Demographics and the 2016 Election Scenarios | RealClearPolitics

Nothing in that gibberish produces a plausible scenario with the GOP losing 75% of the Hispanic vote.

Read the Goddamned thing before talking out of your ass.

I reset the black vote to normal historical levels of 11% for GOP.

I raised the Hispanic vote until the GOP was ahead in the popular vote. It had to go to 43%.

It's up to you to come up with plausible changes in the other figures if you want to show the GOP winning with 25% of the Hispanic vote.

YOU go to the chart,

set the Hispanic vote at 25% and then juggle the other numbers until you get the GOP ahead.

Then make the case that your juggled numbers are plausible outcomes in 2016.

Try moving the white vote.

No. Sorry, regurgitating something you read on dingbat sites is not going to cut it:

What share of the Hispanic vote do Republicans need to win in 2016? Is it 44 percent, as some have argued? Is it 49 percent? Or maybe it is as low as 33 percent?

If you’ve followed debates about elections for the past few years, you’ve probably heard analysts give answers to these questions. But the truth is, none of these answers are clearly correct. The reasons are threefold: First, these sorts of projections often hold all else equal from 2012 – that is, they assume that the white, black and Asian vote shares won’t move. Second, the projections offered typically involve the shares of the Hispanic vote (or that of other groups) that Republicans would need to win in order to take the popular vote. But, of course, our elections are determined by the Electoral College, and as we’ll see, Hispanic voters are much less relevant for the Electoral College than the popular vote.

Demographics and the 2016 Election Scenarios | RealClearPolitics

Nothing in that gibberish produces a plausible scenario with the GOP losing 75% of the Hispanic vote.

Read the Goddamned thing before talking out of your ass.

I reset the black vote to normal historical levels of 11% for GOP.

I raised the Hispanic vote until the GOP was ahead in the popular vote. It had to go to 43%.

It's up to you to come up with plausible changes in the other figures if you want to show the GOP winning with 25% of the Hispanic vote.

YOU go to the chart,

set the Hispanic vote at 25% and then juggle the other numbers until you get the GOP ahead.

Then make the case that your juggled numbers are plausible outcomes in 2016.

Try moving the white vote.

You need 80% turnout of the non-Hispanic white vote at the R vs. D share ratio in order to put the GOP ahead in the popular vote

at GOP getting 11% Black and 25% Hispanic.

Not gonna happen.

Adjust the white Republican share of the white vote, not just the turnout. FFS, are you really that dense? Figure it out yourself!