Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
we know the truth and facts hurt youbecause they commit crimes at higher rates--it's not rocket scienceDo what the cops tells you to do.. stop being ignorantThis should be breaking news right now— but it’s not.
Jonathan Price.
Say his name.
Family says Jonathan Price killed in Wolfe City officer-involved shooting while breaking up fight
The family of Jonathan Price says he was fatally shot during an officer-involved shooting in Wolfe City while he was breaking up a fight.www.fox4news.com
So do ALL whites do what the cops tell them to?
Nope...and that’s why many are DEAD ignorant fools.
This shit isn’t complicated...it goes like this...”follow Officer demands or risk dying”
Simple shit
Black Americans are killed at a much higher rate than White Americans
..in fact, they murder at 4 times the rate--so the rate by cops is LOWER
Same old right wing propaganda.
Actually no you can be 17 and own thatRittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Actually no you can be 17 and own thatRittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry
According to his gun rights lawyers it is.Actually no you can be 17 and own thatRittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry
Not in Wisconsin he can't.
According to his gun rights lawyers it is.Actually no you can be 17 and own thatRittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry
Not in Wisconsin he can't.
Actually no you can be 17 and own thatRittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry
Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Yes he didAccording to his gun rights lawyers it is.Actually no you can be 17 and own thatRittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry
Not in Wisconsin he can't.
He never said that.
Actually no you can be 17 and own thatRittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry
I didn’t see that. Do you?
Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
I think your confusion continues.
You can if it is clear cut self defense. If you try to steal a candy bar and the store owner tries to kill you and you fight back that is sure as hell self defense. The fact that you commiting a crime by stealing the candy bar does not prevent you from protecting yourself aginst somebody from trying to murder you.
There is no proof that he was committing a crime by having the AR. A 17 year old can be in possession of a rifle according to Wisconsin law.
Same as here in Florida. A 17 year old can't buy a rifle or carry a concealed weapon but he can be in possession of a rifle or shotgun.
However, even if some fucked up jury decides that he had violated the law by having the rifle that is not murder.
The sonofabitches attacked him with the intent to do him harm and he fought back. Clear cut self defense.
The filthy ass woke AG was an asshole charging him.
His defense team will not only get him acquitted but also bring lawsuits against these vile despicable shitheads that have been slandering him.
Stop trying to defend the indefensible. You just look like a fool.
Actually no you can be 17 and own thatRittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry
I didn’t see that. Do you?
Front Page Featured | MRCTV
www.cnsnews.com
Who’s not equal?Justice...for all or for some?
Let’s talk about that. Because the reality is that the life of a Black person in America has never been treated as fully human. And america has yet to fulfill that promise of equal justice under law
You can indict a ham sandwich lolActually no you can be 17 and own thatRittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry
I didn’t see that. Do you?
Front Page Featured | MRCTV
If it was legal there is nothing to argue concerning the law being unconstitutuonal.
You can indict a ham sandwich lolActually no you can be 17 and own thatRittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry
I didn’t see that. Do you?
Front Page Featured | MRCTV
If it was legal there is nothing to argue concerning the law being unconstitutuonal.
Title 10 Section 246 of United States Code renders that charge in any ordinance, that that charge will be based on blatantly unconstitutional under these circumstances
Well he wasn’t in that state lolYou can indict a ham sandwich lolActually no you can be 17 and own thatRittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry
I didn’t see that. Do you?
Front Page Featured | MRCTV
If it was legal there is nothing to argue concerning the law being unconstitutuonal.
Title 10 Section 246 of United States Code renders that charge in any ordinance, that that charge will be based on blatantly unconstitutional under these circumstances
United States v. Rene E ruled that states can restrict the gun ownership of minors.
Actually no you can be 17 and own thatRittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry
I didn’t see that. Do you?
Front Page Featured | MRCTV
Yup tards keep lynching republicans who defend them selves from black animals,, and wasting money. We will all be out soon, like Zimmerman locked and loadedActually no you can be 17 and own thatRittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry
I didn’t see that. Do you?
Front Page Featured | MRCTV
That is going to be decided by the courts. Now help me out here. When a cop shoots someone and the Grand Jury declines to indict that is justice. When the grand jury indicts that is political witch hunt. If someone is caught by police they are suppose to tell it to the judge. Unless that is a white person, then no judge is needed. Will you all make up your damned minds?
Yup tards keep lynching republicans who defend them selves from black animals,, and wasting money. We will all be out soon, like Zimmerman locked and loadedActually no you can be 17 and own thatRittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.
You may be a little confused on that.
The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.
However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.
You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry
I didn’t see that. Do you?
Front Page Featured | MRCTV
That is going to be decided by the courts. Now help me out here. When a cop shoots someone and the Grand Jury declines to indict that is justice. When the grand jury indicts that is political witch hunt. If someone is caught by police they are suppose to tell it to the judge. Unless that is a white person, then no judge is needed. Will you all make up your damned minds?
