Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 71,554
- 51,681
- 3,565
Your sudden fascination with the religion may be an omenI didn't convert to Judaism.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your sudden fascination with the religion may be an omenI didn't convert to Judaism.
No you're not. You're advocating for the killing of the victim childI am minding my own business is what you should do
RacistJames, a Farmington Hills businessman and U.S. Army veteran, is a staunch proponent of rolling back access to abortions. He opposes abortion in cases of rape and incest, said he would support Roe v. Wade being overturned and compared to abortion to “genocide” during his failed 2018 Senate bid.
Michigan Democrats hit John James for anti-abortion comments
We found that James has repeatedly dodged questions when asked whether he would make an exception to abortion prohibitions in cases where a mother’s life is at risk. Meanwhile, James favors overturning Roe v. Wade. The 1973 Supreme Court case invalidated Michigan’s 1931 law that makes it a felony to administer an abortion in all cases except when the mother’s life is at risk. This law is still on the books and could be enforced if Roe v. Wade is overturned. James has not said whether he supports Michigan’s pre-Roe abortion ban.
What James has said about cases involving risk to a mother’s life
James anti-abortion stance is clear. In a 2018 tweet, James wrote: “I am 100% #ProLife because I believe life begins at conception and ends at a natural death. We will not stop fighting until we end abortion, for it is our sacred duty to protect the most vulnerable among us: the unborn.” During a July 13, 2018, campaign event, James called abortion a form of “genocide,” according to audio released by the Michigan Democratic Party.
Whether James supports an exception when a mother’s life is in danger is less clear. When James ran unsuccessfully for the Senate in 2018, his campaign said he supports an exception in such cases, but neither James nor his campaign has answered questions on his position since.
Ahead of the 2018 primary election, when James was asked in a WILS-AM 1320 interview whether he supports exceptions in cases where the life of the mother is at risk or pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, he answered: “I believe the focus should be given to maintaining and protecting life and exhausting every remedy to wrap our arms around both the mother and the baby, making sure that we eliminate situations that put our women in these terrible situations that no one wants to be in.”
-----------------------------------------------Fact check: Gary Peters says John James opposes abortion even when mother's life at risk
James supports overturning Roe v. Wade, but he has not clarified whether an abortion might be permissible in some circumstances.www.freep.com
But I'm pro choice, is what majority are in MI. A women's right to choose and privacy are at stake.
RacistJames, a Farmington Hills businessman and U.S. Army veteran, is a staunch proponent of rolling back access to abortions. He opposes abortion in cases of rape and incest, said he would support Roe v. Wade being overturned and compared to abortion to “genocide” during his failed 2018 Senate bid.
Michigan Democrats hit John James for anti-abortion comments
We found that James has repeatedly dodged questions when asked whether he would make an exception to abortion prohibitions in cases where a mother’s life is at risk. Meanwhile, James favors overturning Roe v. Wade. The 1973 Supreme Court case invalidated Michigan’s 1931 law that makes it a felony to administer an abortion in all cases except when the mother’s life is at risk. This law is still on the books and could be enforced if Roe v. Wade is overturned. James has not said whether he supports Michigan’s pre-Roe abortion ban.
What James has said about cases involving risk to a mother’s life
James anti-abortion stance is clear. In a 2018 tweet, James wrote: “I am 100% #ProLife because I believe life begins at conception and ends at a natural death. We will not stop fighting until we end abortion, for it is our sacred duty to protect the most vulnerable among us: the unborn.” During a July 13, 2018, campaign event, James called abortion a form of “genocide,” according to audio released by the Michigan Democratic Party.
Whether James supports an exception when a mother’s life is in danger is less clear. When James ran unsuccessfully for the Senate in 2018, his campaign said he supports an exception in such cases, but neither James nor his campaign has answered questions on his position since.
Ahead of the 2018 primary election, when James was asked in a WILS-AM 1320 interview whether he supports exceptions in cases where the life of the mother is at risk or pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, he answered: “I believe the focus should be given to maintaining and protecting life and exhausting every remedy to wrap our arms around both the mother and the baby, making sure that we eliminate situations that put our women in these terrible situations that no one wants to be in.”
-----------------------------------------------Fact check: Gary Peters says John James opposes abortion even when mother's life at risk
James supports overturning Roe v. Wade, but he has not clarified whether an abortion might be permissible in some circumstances.www.freep.com
But I'm pro choice, is what majority are in MI. A women's right to choose and privacy are at stake.
I hear women now use the term "we are pregnant", so apparently so.I thought gender was a social construct? Men can be women now, so yes, men can tell women what they can do with “their body”.A women's right to choose
Can men get pregnant??
Maybe you should stop being racist thenRacistJames, a Farmington Hills businessman and U.S. Army veteran, is a staunch proponent of rolling back access to abortions. He opposes abortion in cases of rape and incest, said he would support Roe v. Wade being overturned and compared to abortion to “genocide” during his failed 2018 Senate bid.
Michigan Democrats hit John James for anti-abortion comments
We found that James has repeatedly dodged questions when asked whether he would make an exception to abortion prohibitions in cases where a mother’s life is at risk. Meanwhile, James favors overturning Roe v. Wade. The 1973 Supreme Court case invalidated Michigan’s 1931 law that makes it a felony to administer an abortion in all cases except when the mother’s life is at risk. This law is still on the books and could be enforced if Roe v. Wade is overturned. James has not said whether he supports Michigan’s pre-Roe abortion ban.
What James has said about cases involving risk to a mother’s life
James anti-abortion stance is clear. In a 2018 tweet, James wrote: “I am 100% #ProLife because I believe life begins at conception and ends at a natural death. We will not stop fighting until we end abortion, for it is our sacred duty to protect the most vulnerable among us: the unborn.” During a July 13, 2018, campaign event, James called abortion a form of “genocide,” according to audio released by the Michigan Democratic Party.
Whether James supports an exception when a mother’s life is in danger is less clear. When James ran unsuccessfully for the Senate in 2018, his campaign said he supports an exception in such cases, but neither James nor his campaign has answered questions on his position since.
Ahead of the 2018 primary election, when James was asked in a WILS-AM 1320 interview whether he supports exceptions in cases where the life of the mother is at risk or pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, he answered: “I believe the focus should be given to maintaining and protecting life and exhausting every remedy to wrap our arms around both the mother and the baby, making sure that we eliminate situations that put our women in these terrible situations that no one wants to be in.”
-----------------------------------------------Fact check: Gary Peters says John James opposes abortion even when mother's life at risk
James supports overturning Roe v. Wade, but he has not clarified whether an abortion might be permissible in some circumstances.www.freep.com
But I'm pro choice, is what majority are in MI. A women's right to choose and privacy are at stake.
OMG, I have never been called a racist before, only all the time!!
It was done in jest. Went over your empty head though.RacistJames, a Farmington Hills businessman and U.S. Army veteran, is a staunch proponent of rolling back access to abortions. He opposes abortion in cases of rape and incest, said he would support Roe v. Wade being overturned and compared to abortion to “genocide” during his failed 2018 Senate bid.
Michigan Democrats hit John James for anti-abortion comments
We found that James has repeatedly dodged questions when asked whether he would make an exception to abortion prohibitions in cases where a mother’s life is at risk. Meanwhile, James favors overturning Roe v. Wade. The 1973 Supreme Court case invalidated Michigan’s 1931 law that makes it a felony to administer an abortion in all cases except when the mother’s life is at risk. This law is still on the books and could be enforced if Roe v. Wade is overturned. James has not said whether he supports Michigan’s pre-Roe abortion ban.
What James has said about cases involving risk to a mother’s life
James anti-abortion stance is clear. In a 2018 tweet, James wrote: “I am 100% #ProLife because I believe life begins at conception and ends at a natural death. We will not stop fighting until we end abortion, for it is our sacred duty to protect the most vulnerable among us: the unborn.” During a July 13, 2018, campaign event, James called abortion a form of “genocide,” according to audio released by the Michigan Democratic Party.
Whether James supports an exception when a mother’s life is in danger is less clear. When James ran unsuccessfully for the Senate in 2018, his campaign said he supports an exception in such cases, but neither James nor his campaign has answered questions on his position since.
Ahead of the 2018 primary election, when James was asked in a WILS-AM 1320 interview whether he supports exceptions in cases where the life of the mother is at risk or pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, he answered: “I believe the focus should be given to maintaining and protecting life and exhausting every remedy to wrap our arms around both the mother and the baby, making sure that we eliminate situations that put our women in these terrible situations that no one wants to be in.”
-----------------------------------------------Fact check: Gary Peters says John James opposes abortion even when mother's life at risk
James supports overturning Roe v. Wade, but he has not clarified whether an abortion might be permissible in some circumstances.www.freep.com
But I'm pro choice, is what majority are in MI. A women's right to choose and privacy are at stake.
OMG, I have never been called a racist before, only all the time!!
It was done in jest. Went over your empty head though.RacistJames, a Farmington Hills businessman and U.S. Army veteran, is a staunch proponent of rolling back access to abortions. He opposes abortion in cases of rape and incest, said he would support Roe v. Wade being overturned and compared to abortion to “genocide” during his failed 2018 Senate bid.
Michigan Democrats hit John James for anti-abortion comments
We found that James has repeatedly dodged questions when asked whether he would make an exception to abortion prohibitions in cases where a mother’s life is at risk. Meanwhile, James favors overturning Roe v. Wade. The 1973 Supreme Court case invalidated Michigan’s 1931 law that makes it a felony to administer an abortion in all cases except when the mother’s life is at risk. This law is still on the books and could be enforced if Roe v. Wade is overturned. James has not said whether he supports Michigan’s pre-Roe abortion ban.
What James has said about cases involving risk to a mother’s life
James anti-abortion stance is clear. In a 2018 tweet, James wrote: “I am 100% #ProLife because I believe life begins at conception and ends at a natural death. We will not stop fighting until we end abortion, for it is our sacred duty to protect the most vulnerable among us: the unborn.” During a July 13, 2018, campaign event, James called abortion a form of “genocide,” according to audio released by the Michigan Democratic Party.
Whether James supports an exception when a mother’s life is in danger is less clear. When James ran unsuccessfully for the Senate in 2018, his campaign said he supports an exception in such cases, but neither James nor his campaign has answered questions on his position since.
Ahead of the 2018 primary election, when James was asked in a WILS-AM 1320 interview whether he supports exceptions in cases where the life of the mother is at risk or pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, he answered: “I believe the focus should be given to maintaining and protecting life and exhausting every remedy to wrap our arms around both the mother and the baby, making sure that we eliminate situations that put our women in these terrible situations that no one wants to be in.”
-----------------------------------------------Fact check: Gary Peters says John James opposes abortion even when mother's life at risk
James supports overturning Roe v. Wade, but he has not clarified whether an abortion might be permissible in some circumstances.www.freep.com
But I'm pro choice, is what majority are in MI. A women's right to choose and privacy are at stake.
OMG, I have never been called a racist before, only all the time!!
You dont mind your own business when you think a racist cop has murdered an innocent black man.I am minding my own business is what you should do
James, a Farmington Hills businessman and U.S. Army veteran, is a staunch proponent of rolling back access to abortions. He opposes abortion in cases of rape and incest, said he would support Roe v. Wade being overturned and compared to abortion to “genocide” during his failed 2018 Senate bid.
Michigan Democrats hit John James for anti-abortion comments
We found that James has repeatedly dodged questions when asked whether he would make an exception to abortion prohibitions in cases where a mother’s life is at risk. Meanwhile, James favors overturning Roe v. Wade. The 1973 Supreme Court case invalidated Michigan’s 1931 law that makes it a felony to administer an abortion in all cases except when the mother’s life is at risk. This law is still on the books and could be enforced if Roe v. Wade is overturned. James has not said whether he supports Michigan’s pre-Roe abortion ban.
What James has said about cases involving risk to a mother’s life
James anti-abortion stance is clear. In a 2018 tweet, James wrote: “I am 100% #ProLife because I believe life begins at conception and ends at a natural death. We will not stop fighting until we end abortion, for it is our sacred duty to protect the most vulnerable among us: the unborn.” During a July 13, 2018, campaign event, James called abortion a form of “genocide,” according to audio released by the Michigan Democratic Party.
Whether James supports an exception when a mother’s life is in danger is less clear. When James ran unsuccessfully for the Senate in 2018, his campaign said he supports an exception in such cases, but neither James nor his campaign has answered questions on his position since.
Ahead of the 2018 primary election, when James was asked in a WILS-AM 1320 interview whether he supports exceptions in cases where the life of the mother is at risk or pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, he answered: “I believe the focus should be given to maintaining and protecting life and exhausting every remedy to wrap our arms around both the mother and the baby, making sure that we eliminate situations that put our women in these terrible situations that no one wants to be in.”
-----------------------------------------------Fact check: Gary Peters says John James opposes abortion even when mother's life at risk
James supports overturning Roe v. Wade, but he has not clarified whether an abortion might be permissible in some circumstances.www.freep.com
But I'm pro choice, is what majority are in MI. A women's right to choose and privacy are at stake.
Antisemite is real. Racist was a joke. You admitted to being an antisemite.It was done in jest. Went over your empty head though.RacistJames, a Farmington Hills businessman and U.S. Army veteran, is a staunch proponent of rolling back access to abortions. He opposes abortion in cases of rape and incest, said he would support Roe v. Wade being overturned and compared to abortion to “genocide” during his failed 2018 Senate bid.
Michigan Democrats hit John James for anti-abortion comments
We found that James has repeatedly dodged questions when asked whether he would make an exception to abortion prohibitions in cases where a mother’s life is at risk. Meanwhile, James favors overturning Roe v. Wade. The 1973 Supreme Court case invalidated Michigan’s 1931 law that makes it a felony to administer an abortion in all cases except when the mother’s life is at risk. This law is still on the books and could be enforced if Roe v. Wade is overturned. James has not said whether he supports Michigan’s pre-Roe abortion ban.
What James has said about cases involving risk to a mother’s life
James anti-abortion stance is clear. In a 2018 tweet, James wrote: “I am 100% #ProLife because I believe life begins at conception and ends at a natural death. We will not stop fighting until we end abortion, for it is our sacred duty to protect the most vulnerable among us: the unborn.” During a July 13, 2018, campaign event, James called abortion a form of “genocide,” according to audio released by the Michigan Democratic Party.
Whether James supports an exception when a mother’s life is in danger is less clear. When James ran unsuccessfully for the Senate in 2018, his campaign said he supports an exception in such cases, but neither James nor his campaign has answered questions on his position since.
Ahead of the 2018 primary election, when James was asked in a WILS-AM 1320 interview whether he supports exceptions in cases where the life of the mother is at risk or pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, he answered: “I believe the focus should be given to maintaining and protecting life and exhausting every remedy to wrap our arms around both the mother and the baby, making sure that we eliminate situations that put our women in these terrible situations that no one wants to be in.”
-----------------------------------------------Fact check: Gary Peters says John James opposes abortion even when mother's life at risk
James supports overturning Roe v. Wade, but he has not clarified whether an abortion might be permissible in some circumstances.www.freep.com
But I'm pro choice, is what majority are in MI. A women's right to choose and privacy are at stake.
OMG, I have never been called a racist before, only all the time!!
No it didn't go over my head. You usually call me an anti-Semite, now I'm just a plain ole racist. LOL
And you want the father to die or at least stay out of the picture so some other dude can have his turn at fucking that whore?you want an innocent child to die while the criminal father is allowed to live?
Cervix is Latin for "neck" whether it's the neck of the uterus or the neck that attaches you head to your shoulders. People can be so stupid. Slander some Greek family name, get a "Pap" smear, the doctor's breathing real heavy over the microscope, decided whether he's going to diagnose a cervical cancer and schedule a hysterectomy or "let it slide" this time.born with a cervix
You must be out of your mindAnd you want the father to die or at least stay out of the picture so some other dude can have his turn at fucking that whore?you want an innocent child to die while the criminal father is allowed to live?
You're talking "innocent child" but you're not letting the baby live with that attitude, either. There are far too many deadbeat dads with an active interest in the abortion clinic establishment.
You people are killing Saint Joseph because the Virgin Mary was conceived of a child by the Holy Ghost.
You yourself are suicidally damned to hell for all eternity for even suggesting that of another human being.You must be out of your mind
I care just as much about those babies when they are born. I would take every one if I could.Do you normally apply the death sentence to the innocent children of criminals?James, a Farmington Hills businessman and U.S. Army veteran, is a staunch proponent of rolling back access to abortions. He opposes abortion in cases of rape and incest
At the moment of conception, it is not a child. It's a zygote. If a woman is raped or the victim of incest then she should have the right to an abortion. The majority of women don't want that kind of reminder of the trauma walking around.
And I find it deeply amusing that you right to lifers will go to war for a fetus, but the moment it drops out of the mother, you couldn't give a damn about it. Take away its healthcare, its means of food, and defund its right to public education.
Just can't see the forest for the trees when it comes to abortion.
Shame on the Jews if they think a baby isn't human till it's born.How did Israel creep into this conversation?I really don't care who has an abortion or not, and Israel agrees with me, they have abortion and even pay for it.
I’m an American
But you base your belief on the Bible don't you? Its a fallacy the bible said anything about abortion, but the the Jewish Priest tried to make a woman miscarry if she had been adulteress in the OT.
Also the Jews who value pregnancy's say a fetus is not a human till it takes its first breath.
Babies don't talk you stupid bastard.Penelope says if a woman has an abortion it's none of our business, but if a slave trader captured her and sold her at auction to a plantation owner to pick cotton against her will, would that be our business?
According to her logic, no.
Yes , can a fetus talk?? NO!!!
No, becoming a christian does not make you follow the current "teachings" of Jews.If your a Christian you are a Jew, the whole of the New Testament was wrote by Jews.
Conclusion
While the Talmud gives the full status of humanness to a child at birth, the rabbinical writings have partially extended the acquisition of humanness to the 13th postnatal day of life for full-term infants. The Babylonian Talmud Yevamot 69b states that: “the embryo is considered to be mere water until the fortieth day.” Afterwards, it is considered subhuman until it is born.
Keywords: Embryo, Human life, Cloning, Preembryo, Jewish religion
The beginning of human life: Status of embryo. Perspectives in Halakha (Jewish Religious Law)
The Jewish religion is characterized by a strict association between faith and practical precept. Jewish law has two sections, the written and the oral tradition. The foundation of the written law and the origin of authority is the Torah, the first five ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
It's the Jason Bourne trilogy.when they are born