Joe Miller Supports Constitutional Amendment Defining Marriage Is Between Man & Woman

Discussion in 'Politics' started by USArmyRetired, Oct 28, 2010.

  1. USArmyRetired
    Offline

    USArmyRetired BANNED

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,601
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +346
    This is something I agree with and it is the proper value that should be instilled into today's society. America must maintain traditional conservative customs and values that has made this country what it is today. Same sex marriages or unions of the same sex has not built this nation of what it is today and it damn sure can't carry this nation into the future and sustain it. Marriage between men and women and the creation of strong conservative family christian values is a must for America. You see, part of freedom is not allowing the agenda of a tiny, perverted radical 1% of the population be forced off onto the rest of us. Joe Miller has the right idea and he is right for America and homosexuality along with homosexuals is not.


    Alaska Senate Candidate Joe Miller Endorses Federal Same-Sex 'Marriage' Ban

    FAIRBANKS, Alaska, October 27, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Alaska GOP Senate candidate Joe Miller stated recently that he would support a U.S. constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman, although he would prefer the matter left to the states.

    Miller, a pro-life candidate running neck-and-neck with incumbent and write-in candidate Lisa Murkowski for U.S. Senator, told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that he would support a constitutional amendment, if that were seen as the solution to the challenge of legal same-sex “marriage.”

    Maddow, who is a self-identified lesbian, asked Miller about his position on gay rights and then specifically asked about his thoughts on a campaign employee who thought homosexuality could be treated or changed.

    Addressing her first point, Miller emphasized that issues related to homosexuality “are really a state issue” and indicated they should be handled at a state, not federal level.

    Miller said Terry Moffitt had worked with his primary campaign, but he had not seen the website HopeforHomosexuals.com and was unable to comment on it.

    Maddow then asked if Miller agreed that homosexuality is a choice.

    The rest of the segment can be viewed here:
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show/#39860606
     
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2010
  2. Justin Buell
    Offline

    Justin Buell Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2010
    Messages:
    54
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    Detroit, MI
    Ratings:
    +7
    Marriage is a religious institution and should be defined by religious authorties.

    This is an issue of seperation of church and state.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. Kevin_Kennedy
    Offline

    Kevin_Kennedy Defend Liberty

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    17,590
    Thanks Received:
    1,581
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +2,027
    So Joe Miller wants to grow the government. Seems contradictory to the Tea Party line, don't you think?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. USArmyRetired
    Offline

    USArmyRetired BANNED

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,601
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +346
    How does he want to grow the government? Give specifics please.
     
  5. NYcarbineer
    Online

    NYcarbineer Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    96,182
    Thanks Received:
    11,272
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Location:
    Finger Lakes, NY
    Ratings:
    +30,284
    I posted about this yesterday:

    Miller emphasized that issues related to homosexuality “are really a state issue”

    and THEN he says he wants a constitutional amendment to take the issue away from the states.

    Could he BE a phonier two-faced incoherent fuck???

    (no)
     
  6. Justin Buell
    Offline

    Justin Buell Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2010
    Messages:
    54
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    Detroit, MI
    Ratings:
    +7
    The Federal Government doesn't have the power to define marriage now. With an amendment like this, it will gain that power. I'd call that a growth.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. rightwinger
    Online

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,432
    Thanks Received:
    19,857
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,455
    So it looks like Joe Miller is for Big Government wanting to get into our bedrooms
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. NYcarbineer
    Online

    NYcarbineer Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    96,182
    Thanks Received:
    11,272
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Location:
    Finger Lakes, NY
    Ratings:
    +30,284
    It's just more evidence that the Tea Party, whatever it once was or once intended to be, is just a new name for the same old Republican rightwing,

    with the 'Christian' social conservative Right back in the driver's seat (at least most of the time).
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    Just think of the economic boom gay marriage would being.
    A whole new gay wedding industry. Gay wedding gowns, etc.
     
  10. JWBooth
    Offline

    JWBooth Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    6,799
    Thanks Received:
    1,555
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Location:
    Fredonia Republic
    Ratings:
    +1,957

    [​IMG]

    Every dickhead that comes along - left and right - has a cure for some non problem, non government venue, with some unnecessary constitutional amendment.
     

Share This Page