Joe Biden's Reign of Error

[struth]

Not forgetting the LA musician that built tiny homes and gave them to the homeless, at which point the City confiscated them because it "owned" the real estate under them.

We've seen no subsequent reports of people working for and earning the materials, even though the video to be made is the one showing ownership of a pre-fab tiny that assembles and dis-assembles to go back into storage at the end of the video.

Simply making this video would correctly expose the violence of these administration- and building-code pimps.

Wait who just randomly built buildings and placed them on property they didn’t own?? What an idiot

 

[badger2]

Wait who just randomly built buildings and placed them on property they didn’t own?? What an idiot

Nope. It was a stroke of genius. Capitalism manufactures the dispossessed and homeless as it does Ford cars and toothpaste.

The video should be @ youtube.

 

[struth]

Nope. It was a stroke of genius. Capitalism manufactures the dispossessed and homeless as it does Ford cars and toothpaste.

The video should be @ youtube.

What was genius about buying a building and putting it on someone else’s property???

 

[badger2]

What was genius about buying a building and putting it on someone else’s property???

The illusion of property ownership was confronted by the ownership of the tiny homes by the homeless being stolen by the City of Los Angeles. This was the genius of the musician's gesture.

The buildings were a gift, not bought. What is that value at the point of exchange?

 

[struth]

The illusion of property ownership was confronted by the ownership of the tiny homes by the homeless being stolen by the City of Los Angeles. This was the genius of the musician's gesture.

The buildings were a gift, not bought. What is that value at the point of exchange?

What was the illusion? He didn’t own the land where he put his tiny buildings…therefore he couldn’t keep them there.

 

[badger2]

Local control is damning? How?

Here is the video for local control and the question of the value at the point of exchange:

Los Angeles / Elvis Summers

 

[badger2]

What was the illusion? He didn’t own the land where he put his tiny buildings…therefore he couldn’t keep them there.

The illusion of ownership was made real by the City of Los Angeles. You see no pathology in this gesture? The ownership was real, forcing the dipshit City of Los Angeles into a fallback position: it then had to invoke ownership of the very land that supported the homeless bodies even before they became owners of tiny homes.

 

[struth]

The illusion of ownership was made real by the City of Los Angeles. You see no pathology in this gesture? The ownership was real, forcing the dipshit City of Los Angeles into a fallback position: it then had to invoke ownership of the very land that supported the homeless bodies even before they became owners of tiny homes.

The ownership of the buildings were real but not the real property it was placed on. He didn’t own that. You can’t just put your buildings are other people property

 

[badger2]

The musician's genius gesture was that the homeless could stay until the issue of value at the point of exchange was breached by the gift of tiny homes: the illusion that the homeless owned the property (the real estate under their feet).

 

[badger2]

The musician's gesture is still genius: exposing the contradictions of class-difference capitalism: hilariously enough, those homeless instantly became home owners being robbed of their property. Summers exposed a capitalist axiomatic: it manufactures, (as a crucial part of its operations [italics]) the dispossessed and deterritorialized, in the same way that it manufactures other material objects such as cars and toothpaste.

 

[badger2]

What was the value, at the point of exchange, of those tiny homes to those new home owners?