OH Good night time for bed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OH Good night time for bed
bigrebnc1775
. . .
Both sides? I am not a party man, but I am a Republican. So it would be inaccurate on your part to say I have not seen the damage the Republican party has done.
Democrat and Republican both want the samething but do things differntly to get what they want. As for your claim . . .
JOB CREATION NOT THE PRESIDENT’S JOB.
You are right and I applause him for at least trying. The right and Wall Street has done everything they can to suppress job creation in order to attempt to win back control over the government. That is not lost on ***Independents*** as the right parade their elitists and deride the maverick group of current ??? candidates???
Damn I do not see how we managed while Bush was President with a high 5.6 unemployment rate.
This was back in 2004
Bush officials try to cherry-pick statistics; its still worst job creation record in 60 yearsEPI Viewpoints
Failing to find solace in the employment numbers, the administration points instead to the 5.6 percent unemployment rate. Although the unemployment rate has fallen, it has happened because record numbers of people have abandoned the search for jobs that dont exist. Long-term unemployment is at a peak compared to the same point in the previous four recessions. In February, nearly one-fourth of unemployed people had been out of work at least six months. The average unemployment spell is 20.3 weeks, the longest average unemployment duration in more than 20 years.
Bush officials try to cherry-pick statistics; its still worst job creation record in 60 yearsEPI Viewpoints | Economic Policy Institute
I'm sure you'll enjoy reading this and all about that un-godly high unemployment rate of 5.6
February 29, 2004
IT'S ALL RELATIVE
Is 5.6 percent a low figure, or a high one? Depends. If only 5.6 percent of hamburgers are discovered to contain meat, thats way low. But if 5.6 percent of teachers are using their students as drug mules in elaborate Asian heroin importing schemes, thats sort of high.
Tim Blair: IT'S ALL RELATIVE
And from another discussion group people just like us
This person started a thread dated 04-03-2004,
Can we necessarily believe Bush's new jobs claim?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Administration, the Bureau of Labor Statistics says we generated 308,000 new jobs in March.
But with Dubya's record of lying, is there a likelihood that he's exaggerating the numbers, or maybe even flat out lying?
It isn't as if Dubya's above manipulating facts to suit his own agenda. We found out the true cost of his Medicare program from a whistleblower.
The lies go on and on and on.
Go ahead, call it sour grapes, but I think only a retard would accept as fact, anything that comes out of this WH.
Can we necessarily believe Bush's new jobs claim? - Straight Dope Message Board
Uncle Ferd says he'd be willin' to stay at home fer half dat and save Obama some money he could use to reduce the deficit...
Obama Predicts: His Plan Will Cost $235,263 Per Job
September 16, 2011 - President Barack Obama said at a fundraiser held in a private residence in Washington, D.C., on Thursday evening that the $447 billion American Jobs Act he has proposed will create 1.9 million American jobswhich works out to a cost of about $235,263 per job.
Its estimated that the American Jobs Act would add two percentage points to the GDP, and add as many as 1.9 million jobs, and bring the unemployment rate down by a full percentage point, Obama said, according to the official White House transcript of his remarks.
Obama did not say who made the estimate in question, but his remarks mirrored the conclusions of an analysis made by Mark Zandi, the chief economist for Moodys Analytics. The plan would add 2 percentage points to GDP growth next year, add 1.9 million jobs, and cut the unemployment rate by a percentage point, Zandi wrote.
In a fact sheet published by Office of the Press Secretary, the White House itself has estimated that presidents new jobs plan will cost a total of $447 billion. $447 billion divided by 1.9 million equals approximately $235,263.
Obama Predicts: His Plan Will Cost $235,263 Per Job | CNSnews.com
Uncle Ferd says he'd be willin' to stay at home fer half dat and save Obama some money he could use to reduce the deficit...
Obama Predicts: His Plan Will Cost $235,263 Per Job
September 16, 2011 - President Barack Obama said at a fundraiser held in a private residence in Washington, D.C., on Thursday evening that the $447 billion American Jobs Act he has proposed will create 1.9 million American jobswhich works out to a cost of about $235,263 per job.
Its estimated that the American Jobs Act would add two percentage points to the GDP, and add as many as 1.9 million jobs, and bring the unemployment rate down by a full percentage point, Obama said, according to the official White House transcript of his remarks.
Obama did not say who made the estimate in question, but his remarks mirrored the conclusions of an analysis made by Mark Zandi, the chief economist for Moodys Analytics. The plan would add 2 percentage points to GDP growth next year, add 1.9 million jobs, and cut the unemployment rate by a percentage point, Zandi wrote.
In a fact sheet published by Office of the Press Secretary, the White House itself has estimated that presidents new jobs plan will cost a total of $447 billion. $447 billion divided by 1.9 million equals approximately $235,263.
Obama Predicts: His Plan Will Cost $235,263 Per Job | CNSnews.com
just send me 50k and I'll be happy to stay at home
Did I just kill another thread?
Damn I do not see how we managed while Bush was President with a high 5.6 unemployment rate.
This was back in 2004
Bush officials try to cherry-pick statistics; it’s still worst job creation record in 60 years—EPI Viewpoints
Failing to find solace in the employment numbers, the administration points instead to the 5.6 percent unemployment rate. Although the unemployment rate has fallen, it has happened because record numbers of people have abandoned the search for jobs that don’t exist. Long-term unemployment is at a peak compared to the same point in the previous four recessions. In February, nearly one-fourth of unemployed people had been out of work at least six months. The average unemployment spell is 20.3 weeks, the longest average unemployment duration in more than 20 years.
Bush officials try to cherry-pick statistics; it’s still worst job creation record in 60 years—EPI Viewpoints | Economic Policy Institute
I'm sure you'll enjoy reading this and all about that un-godly high unemployment rate of 5.6
February 29, 2004
IT'S ALL RELATIVE
Is 5.6 percent a low figure, or a high one? Depends. If only 5.6 percent of hamburgers are discovered to contain meat, that’s way low. But if 5.6 percent of teachers are using their students as drug mules in elaborate Asian heroin importing schemes, that’s sort of high.
Tim Blair: IT'S ALL RELATIVE
And from another discussion group people just like us
This person started a thread dated 04-03-2004,
Can we necessarily believe Bush's new jobs claim?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Administration, the Bureau of Labor Statistics says we generated 308,000 new jobs in March.
But with Dubya's record of lying, is there a likelihood that he's exaggerating the numbers, or maybe even flat out lying?
It isn't as if Dubya's above manipulating facts to suit his own agenda. We found out the true cost of his Medicare program from a whistleblower.
The lies go on and on and on.
Go ahead, call it sour grapes, but I think only a retard would accept as fact, anything that comes out of this WH.
Can we necessarily believe Bush's new jobs claim? - Straight Dope Message Board
Nor is it his job to foster an environment that is flagrantly "anti-jobs"
Nor is it his job to foster an environment that is flagrantly "anti-jobs".....'Cause we've already experienced that, with.....
Nor is it his job to foster an environment that is flagrantly "anti-jobs".....'Cause we've already experienced that, with.....