Jesse Watters absolutely decimates liberal ideology

Jesse who? This is one of the unknown rubes that hides on Faux News and is only seen in the conservative bubble?

This is the state of conservatism, it will believe some guy on a talk show but reject all the psychiatrists with PH.D's on Earth. The same people no doubt who find out Stephen Hawking says something they don't like and immediately call him an idiot.
I hear they are going to come out with a real conservative network. Fox is middle of the road compared to whats coming.

That would be of interest. I can't say I'm real happy with recent trends at Fox. Though I had my druthers with Bill O'Reilly, I miss his excellent presentation and format. With him, Greta and Kelly gone (though not a fan of Kelly's), their new line-up looks more like a bunch of college kids. Watters is apparently having his moments now and is capable of far more than O'Reilly ever gave him a shot at, but Greg Gutfeld leaves a lot to be desired. Hannity is still there (though he is mostly a one note band) and Tucker looks to be about the best thing they have now. Too bad Lou Dobbs is not on Fox.

But recent shows like The Five and The Fox News Specialists look like a real joke. The Specialists? Are you kidding me? Who dreamed that format up? They should be called The Fox News Generalists. I want real analysis, hard, expert analysis, by people old enough to actually have context on the issues in history.
 
You really believe you know more than a PH.D.

Yeah in your underwear on the internet. Go to your local college and talk to one for five minutes. I say five minutes because after that they'll know you know nothing.

The sad truth Isaac is that:

1). Degrees vary in worth by time. In most instances today, kids with Bachelors now know less than a high school grad did when I was in school. Maybe a lot less.

2). A Doctorate is a great thing, but keep in mind that is expertise in one very narrow field. I've known people who had doctorates in automotive design and engineering that couldn't find the carburetor under the hood to save their lives. I've worked with Masters in Electronics than didn't even own a single multimeter. Never even touched the stuff they studied.

3). No disrespect intended, but a Doctorate is 12 years of study, a few days a week and a couple hours a day in class. Big difference between a new graduate with a doctorate but no real world experience and someone with a lesser degree and 35 years post-experience! Experience out in the real world is highly under-rated. The problem is that HR people are the dumbest of all, that is why they work in HR. They have no idea the qualifications of an applicant so saying you have a degree makes it easier for them to quantify you. Maybe not accurately, but then, they are only interested in covering their butts.
 
You really believe you know more than a PH.D.

Yeah in your underwear on the internet. Go to your local college and talk to one for five minutes. I say five minutes because after that they'll know you know nothing.

The sad truth Isaac is that:

1). Degrees vary in worth by time. In most instances today, kids with Bachelors now know less than a high school grad did when I was in school. Maybe a lot less.

2). A Doctorate is a great thing, but keep in mind that is expertise in one very narrow field. I've known people who had doctorates in automotive design and engineering that couldn't find the carburetor under the hood to save their lives. I've worked with Masters in Electronics than didn't even own a single multimeter. Never even touched the stuff they studied.

3). No disrespect intended, but a Doctorate is 12 years of study, a few days a week and a couple hours a day in class. Big difference between a new graduate with a doctorate but no real world experience and someone with a lesser degree and 35 years post-experience! Experience out in the real world is highly under-rated. The problem is that HR people are the dumbest of all, that is why they work in HR. They have no idea the qualifications of an applicant so saying you have a degree makes it easier for them to quantify you. Maybe not accurately, but then, they are only interested in covering their butts.

A PH.D is a Doctorate. That means the person has as much and as intense schooling as a medical doctor but in another field. And yes they are very specialized that is what makes a PH.D in say physics very smart in physics. A PH.D is no easy thing to attain at college, it takes a lot of work and dedicating a life to something. The way people talk about these PH.D's is bizarre. Who thinks they know more than a PH.D in their field? And yes a PH.D with 30 years experience knows more, generally the obvious not need be stated. But the moment a layperson suggests a PH.D is 'dumb' is time to move on. There are some here that call Stephen Hawking an idiot. He is the modern day Einstein and they are lucky if they can stay up on a skateboard. It's ludicrous to an infinite degree.
 
You really believe you know more than a PH.D.

Yeah in your underwear on the internet. Go to your local college and talk to one for five minutes. I say five minutes because after that they'll know you know nothing.

The sad truth Isaac is that:

1). Degrees vary in worth by time. In most instances today, kids with Bachelors now know less than a high school grad did when I was in school. Maybe a lot less.

2). A Doctorate is a great thing, but keep in mind that is expertise in one very narrow field. I've known people who had doctorates in automotive design and engineering that couldn't find the carburetor under the hood to save their lives. I've worked with Masters in Electronics than didn't even own a single multimeter. Never even touched the stuff they studied.

3). No disrespect intended, but a Doctorate is 12 years of study, a few days a week and a couple hours a day in class. Big difference between a new graduate with a doctorate but no real world experience and someone with a lesser degree and 35 years post-experience! Experience out in the real world is highly under-rated. The problem is that HR people are the dumbest of all, that is why they work in HR. They have no idea the qualifications of an applicant so saying you have a degree makes it easier for them to quantify you. Maybe not accurately, but then, they are only interested in covering their butts.

A PH.D is a Doctorate. That means the person has as much and as intense schooling as a medical doctor but in another field. And yes they are very specialized that is what makes a PH.D in say physics very smart in physics. A PH.D is no easy thing to attain at college, it takes a lot of work and dedicating a life to something. The way people talk about these PH.D's is bizarre. Who thinks they know more than a PH.D in their field? And yes a PH.D with 30 years experience knows more, generally the obvious not need be stated. But the moment a layperson suggests a PH.D is 'dumb' is time to move on. There are some here that call Stephen Hawking an idiot. He is the modern day Einstein and they are lucky if they can stay up on a skateboard. It's ludicrous to an infinite degree.

Yes, a PHD in physics is a hard thing to get, but a PHD in gender studies is a joke that you get purely by kissing ass.
 
Jesse who? This is one of the unknown rubes that hides on Faux News and is only seen in the conservative bubble?

This is the state of conservatism, it will believe some guy on a talk show but reject all the psychiatrists with PH.D's on Earth. The same people no doubt who find out Stephen Hawking says something they don't like and immediately call him an idiot.
Shrinks Have Been in the Dryer Too Long

Credentialism is for cretins. Paper titles are no more impressive to independent minds than confetti. A PhD is a Mama's Boy who didn't earn a living until he was 30 because he preferred to hide from the real world. It's like celibate priests becoming marriage counselors.

You really believe you know more than a PH.D.
Go to your local college and talk to one for five minutes. I say five minutes because after that they'll know you know nothing.

Angry hot air isn't knowledge. .
Academentia

Your bitter ranting tantrum is empty vapor puffed out in defense of your desperate and infantile slavishness to academic father figures. Those mentally gouged escapists spend their whole lives talking away reality and reinforcing their own confused dogmas in the Ivory Tower echo chamber. You're not a Newton, you're just a fig leaf.
 
You really believe you know more than a PH.D.

Yeah in your underwear on the internet. Go to your local college and talk to one for five minutes. I say five minutes because after that they'll know you know nothing.

The sad truth Isaac is that:

1). Degrees vary in worth by time. In most instances today, kids with Bachelors now know less than a high school grad did when I was in school. Maybe a lot less.

2). A Doctorate is a great thing, but keep in mind that is expertise in one very narrow field. I've known people who had doctorates in automotive design and engineering that couldn't find the carburetor under the hood to save their lives. I've worked with Masters in Electronics than didn't even own a single multimeter. Never even touched the stuff they studied.

3). No disrespect intended, but a Doctorate is 12 years of study, a few days a week and a couple hours a day in class. Big difference between a new graduate with a doctorate but no real world experience and someone with a lesser degree and 35 years post-experience! Experience out in the real world is highly under-rated. The problem is that HR people are the dumbest of all, that is why they work in HR. They have no idea the qualifications of an applicant so saying you have a degree makes it easier for them to quantify you. Maybe not accurately, but then, they are only interested in covering their butts.
A Diploma Is a Participation Trophy

Neither knowledge nor experience produces anything more than a shallow understanding. Being an academic has as little to do with being intelligent as being a sportswriter has to do with being athletic.
 
You really believe you know more than a PH.D.

Yeah in your underwear on the internet. Go to your local college and talk to one for five minutes. I say five minutes because after that they'll know you know nothing.

The sad truth Isaac is that:

1). Degrees vary in worth by time. In most instances today, kids with Bachelors now know less than a high school grad did when I was in school. Maybe a lot less.

2). A Doctorate is a great thing, but keep in mind that is expertise in one very narrow field. I've known people who had doctorates in automotive design and engineering that couldn't find the carburetor under the hood to save their lives. I've worked with Masters in Electronics than didn't even own a single multimeter. Never even touched the stuff they studied.

3). No disrespect intended, but a Doctorate is 12 years of study, a few days a week and a couple hours a day in class. Big difference between a new graduate with a doctorate but no real world experience and someone with a lesser degree and 35 years post-experience! Experience out in the real world is highly under-rated. The problem is that HR people are the dumbest of all, that is why they work in HR. They have no idea the qualifications of an applicant so saying you have a degree makes it easier for them to quantify you. Maybe not accurately, but then, they are only interested in covering their butts.

A PH.D is a Doctorate. That means the person has as much and as intense schooling as a medical doctor but in another field. And yes they are very specialized that is what makes a PH.D in say physics very smart in physics. A PH.D is no easy thing to attain at college, it takes a lot of work and dedicating a life to something. The way people talk about these PH.D's is bizarre. Who thinks they know more than a PH.D in their field? And yes a PH.D with 30 years experience knows more, generally the obvious not need be stated. But the moment a layperson suggests a PH.D is 'dumb' is time to move on. There are some here that call Stephen Hawking an idiot. He is the modern day Einstein and they are lucky if they can stay up on a skateboard. It's ludicrous to an infinite degree.

Isaac, I'm not aware of anyone here saying they were a layperson. Just that you cannot absolutely measure the intelligence or education of a person by a degree they hold alone. I have degrees but not a doctorate, yet I teach people with Ph.D.'s elsewhere on the internet. They are very smart in some things but would be the first to tell you they know little in others. As to Hawking, I see him more of a populist scientist. An amazing man to have done the work he has done considering his handicap. But Einstein revolutionized physics. Transformed it.
 
Waters came a long way since he was an amusing segment in the O'Reilly show. For my money nothing beats Tucker, he is super-smart and articulate and sometimes funny while wading through the B.S. to get to a political point He manages to get provocative guests and engages them in honest debates usually without insults and he doesn't pontificate like O'Reilly used to do. The problem for conservative news analysts is the Soros funded tax exempt left wing propaganda source, Media Matters. If you read the MM masthead you find not surprisingly that MM only monitors conservative speech. There is no such propaganda source on the right side of the political arena. MM staffers are in the business of cherry picking every single word ever spoken in public (and sometimes in private) by a conservative speaker or news analyst or politician and analyzing it before spinning it to left wing blogs like Huffington. It's something to keep in mind when seeing breathless rants spoon fed to mostly ignorant liberals by Soros/ Huffington
And so far the screeds from the lunatic lefties have been working very well and I highly encourage them to keep it up. In fact, they can double down any time now as far as I'm concerned. After all, so far it's cost them the House, Senate, White House, governorships, scads and scads of state legislative seats, etc., and their party is in shambles.

Well done, clowns! Very well done.
 

Forum List

Back
Top