nat4900
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2015
- 42,021
- 5,965
- 1,870
- Banned
- #41
yeah, bring on more of these "interesting" interviews........I agree. We need them.
Comedian Gives Jesse Watters a Taste of His Own Medicine
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
yeah, bring on more of these "interesting" interviews........I agree. We need them.
ILMAO @ absolutely. I have a 4th grade formal education. Perhaps you can't squeeze blood from a turnip? Read: self-esteem and narcissistic - Google Search
Any idiot can find whatever they want to hear or believe on Google.......
That was wit?yeah, bring on more of these "interesting" interviews........I agree. We need them.
Comedian Gives Jesse Watters a Taste of His Own Medicine
To read the comments in this thread you might think the psychologist in the OP being interviewed by Watters was the person responsible for the analysis of trump probably suffering from mental illness. The evaluation was actually made during a conference of eminent psychiatrist and psychologist at a conference at the Yale School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry School of Public Health.Jesse who? This is one of the unknown rubes that hides on Faux News and is only seen in the conservative bubble?
This is the state of conservatism, it will believe some guy on a talk show but reject all the psychiatrists with PH.D's on Earth. The same people no doubt who find out Stephen Hawking says something they don't like and immediately call him an idiot.
Your statement says how narrow minded you are.
Watters is a partisan commentator and at most, on his best rating day may be seen by from a few hundred thousand to a few million viewers a day. The statement from the Yale group was seen by tens of millions of viewers on broadcast news and covered by media all over the world. So, yes, the Watters interview with the psychologist in the OP was seen only in the bubble of conservative viewers that watch FOX News and his particular program.
The bottom line for those who still have a brain and are willing to stop kissing Trump's fat ass, is this:
Does the Trumpster LIE??? yes or no?
Does the Trumpster have low self-esteem that prompts him to be a nasty, narcissistic clown? yes or no?
...and the fuck head, Watters, simply shrug the above off as being "politics".....to the cheers of some of the old, poorly educated,white, racist FOX acolytes stuck on stupid......LOL
yeah, bring on more of these "interesting" interviews........
Let's be fair; we enjoy the outlet that assuages us.To read the comments in this thread you might think the psychologist in the OP being interviewed by Watters was the person responsible for the analysis of trump probably suffering from mental illness. The evaluation was actually made during a conference of eminent psychiatrist and psychologist at a conference at the Yale School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry School of Public Health.Jesse who? This is one of the unknown rubes that hides on Faux News and is only seen in the conservative bubble?
This is the state of conservatism, it will believe some guy on a talk show but reject all the psychiatrists with PH.D's on Earth. The same people no doubt who find out Stephen Hawking says something they don't like and immediately call him an idiot.
Your statement says how narrow minded you are.
Watters is a partisan commentator and at most, on his best rating day may be seen by from a few hundred thousand to a few million viewers a day. The statement from the Yale group was seen by tens of millions of viewers on broadcast news and covered by media all over the world. So, yes, the Watters interview with the psychologist in the OP was seen only in the bubble of conservative viewers that watch FOX News and his particular program.
The bottom line for those who still have a brain and are willing to stop kissing Trump's fat ass, is this:
Does the Trumpster LIE??? yes or no?
Does the Trumpster have low self-esteem that prompts him to be a nasty, narcissistic clown? yes or no?
...and the fuck head, Watters, simply shrug the above off as being "politics".....to the cheers of some of the old, poorly educated,white, racist FOX acolytes stuck on stupid......LOL
yeah, bring on more of these "interesting" interviews........
You watch CNN? That place is full of mental giants. And their fans are self hating whites and victims of a manufactured lie.
That's exactly whst I like about him. He gives leftwing reptiles all the respect theu deserve.Jesse Watters is a smug wiseass and I can't stand him. He's mean spirited and tries to hide it a bit with that shit eating grin he's always wearing.He's on The Five, which is now at 9 p.m.Jesse Waters, wasn't he O'Reilly's towel boy? What is ole Jess up to nowadays since his boss got fired?
And "Watters World" which is where the clip came from. "mental health professional" has become an oxymoron....like Jessie said, the guy in the cheap clothing and worse haircut can't be making much as a shrink....somebody should see if he has a license to practice.
That's why we call CNN "fake news."To read the comments in this thread you might think the psychologist in the OP being interviewed by Watters was the person responsible for the analysis of trump probably suffering from mental illness. The evaluation was actually made during a conference of eminent psychiatrist and psychologist at a conference at the Yale School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry School of Public Health.Jesse who? This is one of the unknown rubes that hides on Faux News and is only seen in the conservative bubble?
This is the state of conservatism, it will believe some guy on a talk show but reject all the psychiatrists with PH.D's on Earth. The same people no doubt who find out Stephen Hawking says something they don't like and immediately call him an idiot.
Your statement says how narrow minded you are.
Watters is a partisan commentator and at most, on his best rating day may be seen by from a few hundred thousand to a few million viewers a day. The statement from the Yale group was seen by tens of millions of viewers on broadcast news and covered by media all over the world. So, yes, the Watters interview with the psychologist in the OP was seen only in the bubble of conservative viewers that watch FOX News and his particular program.
I hear they are going to come out with a real conservative network. Fox is middle of the road compared to whats coming.Jesse who? This is one of the unknown rubes that hides on Faux News and is only seen in the conservative bubble?
This is the state of conservatism, it will believe some guy on a talk show but reject all the psychiatrists with PH.D's on Earth. The same people no doubt who find out Stephen Hawking says something they don't like and immediately call him an idiot.
I hear they are going to come out with a real conservative network. Fox is middle of the road compared to whats coming.Jesse who? This is one of the unknown rubes that hides on Faux News and is only seen in the conservative bubble?
This is the state of conservatism, it will believe some guy on a talk show but reject all the psychiatrists with PH.D's on Earth. The same people no doubt who find out Stephen Hawking says something they don't like and immediately call him an idiot.
North Korea is the leftwing paradise, so no it isn't the same thing.I hear they are going to come out with a real conservative network. Fox is middle of the road compared to whats coming.Jesse who? This is one of the unknown rubes that hides on Faux News and is only seen in the conservative bubble?
This is the state of conservatism, it will believe some guy on a talk show but reject all the psychiatrists with PH.D's on Earth. The same people no doubt who find out Stephen Hawking says something they don't like and immediately call him an idiot.
Or they could just tune in to North Korean state television, same thing.
High and Mighty LowlifeJesse Waters, wasn't he O'Reilly's towel boy? What is ole Jess up to nowadays since his boss got fired?
Shrinks Have Been in the Dryer Too LongJesse who? This is one of the unknown rubes that hides on Faux News and is only seen in the conservative bubble?
This is the state of conservatism, it will believe some guy on a talk show but reject all the psychiatrists with PH.D's on Earth. The same people no doubt who find out Stephen Hawking says something they don't like and immediately call him an idiot.
Shrinks Have Been in the Dryer Too LongJesse who? This is one of the unknown rubes that hides on Faux News and is only seen in the conservative bubble?
This is the state of conservatism, it will believe some guy on a talk show but reject all the psychiatrists with PH.D's on Earth. The same people no doubt who find out Stephen Hawking says something they don't like and immediately call him an idiot.
Credentialism is for cretins. Paper titles are no more impressive to independent minds than confetti. A PhD is a Mama's Boy who didn't earn a living until he was 30 because he preferred to hide from the real world. It's like celibate priests becoming marriage counselors.
Deflating someone with a Doctorate is easy...discuss a real life situation and they know dip shit.Shrinks Have Been in the Dryer Too LongJesse who? This is one of the unknown rubes that hides on Faux News and is only seen in the conservative bubble?
This is the state of conservatism, it will believe some guy on a talk show but reject all the psychiatrists with PH.D's on Earth. The same people no doubt who find out Stephen Hawking says something they don't like and immediately call him an idiot.
Credentialism is for cretins. Paper titles are no more impressive to independent minds than confetti. A PhD is a Mama's Boy who didn't earn a living until he was 30 because he preferred to hide from the real world. It's like celibate priests becoming marriage counselors.
You really believe you know more than a PH.D.
Yeah in your underwear on the internet. Go to your local college and talk to one for five minutes. I say five minutes because after that they'll know you know nothing.
Angry hot air isn't knowledge. It may appear to be on con talk radio but in the real world it is only monkeys flinging their shit around.
Deflating someone with a Doctorate is easy...discuss a real life situation and they know dip shit.Shrinks Have Been in the Dryer Too LongJesse who? This is one of the unknown rubes that hides on Faux News and is only seen in the conservative bubble?
This is the state of conservatism, it will believe some guy on a talk show but reject all the psychiatrists with PH.D's on Earth. The same people no doubt who find out Stephen Hawking says something they don't like and immediately call him an idiot.
Credentialism is for cretins. Paper titles are no more impressive to independent minds than confetti. A PhD is a Mama's Boy who didn't earn a living until he was 30 because he preferred to hide from the real world. It's like celibate priests becoming marriage counselors.
You really believe you know more than a PH.D.
Yeah in your underwear on the internet. Go to your local college and talk to one for five minutes. I say five minutes because after that they'll know you know nothing.
Angry hot air isn't knowledge. It may appear to be on con talk radio but in the real world it is only monkeys flinging their shit around.
How about?...Deflating someone with a Doctorate is easy...discuss a real life situation and they know dip shit.Shrinks Have Been in the Dryer Too LongJesse who? This is one of the unknown rubes that hides on Faux News and is only seen in the conservative bubble?
This is the state of conservatism, it will believe some guy on a talk show but reject all the psychiatrists with PH.D's on Earth. The same people no doubt who find out Stephen Hawking says something they don't like and immediately call him an idiot.
Credentialism is for cretins. Paper titles are no more impressive to independent minds than confetti. A PhD is a Mama's Boy who didn't earn a living until he was 30 because he preferred to hide from the real world. It's like celibate priests becoming marriage counselors.
You really believe you know more than a PH.D.
Yeah in your underwear on the internet. Go to your local college and talk to one for five minutes. I say five minutes because after that they'll know you know nothing.
Angry hot air isn't knowledge. It may appear to be on con talk radio but in the real world it is only monkeys flinging their shit around.
See rule 1 of Internet Smart Guy Doctrine.
#1 - When in underwear in front of computer you are smarter than a person with a PH.D.
#2 - Any idiot knows this, as long as he/she doesn't have a PH.D.