Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #61
Did you read the ruling? Are you aware that Obama actually signed a bill that passed during the time you are now arguing the Senate was in recess? Does being so intellectually dishonest bother you?
I'm asking how Recess is defined. Don't build a staw man when you have no matches and the staw is wet.
It is my undersanding the Senate is playing a game, having few members present but not conducting a spit of business. Is that true, or am I mistaken?
See: Recess appointment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
According to the Constitution, Recess is defined as the period between two sessions of the Senate. Unless you can point to something about games, or something that requires them to actually take a recess, in the Constitution I don't think you have a point
Can you?
While you are at it, can you explain why Obama not nominating anyone for the posts is not playing games? Or do you only complain about games when they get in the way of your imaginative beliefs.
Recess appointment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Thirty were made during recesses between Congresses or between sessions of Congress (intersession recess appointments). The remaining 141 were made during recesses within sessions of Congress (intrasession recess appointments). The duration of the 24 recesses during which President Bush made recess appointments ranged from 10 to 47 days. ..."
https://opencrs.com/document/RL33310/
Last edited: