- Nov 14, 2011
- 121,808
- 68,927
- 2,635
1. Iowa says it's not ... Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are . . . not closely related by blood or first cousins; ... Why on Earth would I take your word for it over Iowa's?? Again, you can't find a single consanguineous marriage to take place in Iowa over a six year period with a pool of quarter of a billion eligible people.Wow, you're really obsessed with men having sex with each other. Look at you, drooling over the thought of it.You just can't stop fantasizing about men having sex with each other, can you, pervert?No, I don't think "dick on dick" is fun but I can't stop you from posting your gay fantasies on the forum. And you've discredited nothing. All you've done is protest that some lawyers you found on blogs think the state of Iowa is wrong when the state says consanguineous marriages are not allowed regardless of gender.
Your whiney protests are not proof. Proof would be you showing a single case where such a couple actually got married in Iowa within the last six years. But as we've established -- you can't find even one single such couple.
Nothing is proof to a delusional dick lover. Not the Iowa Law, not 5 legal experts.
That dancing dude? Looks like one of the village people, the group you fantasize about fluffing.
Dude, admit you're gay, it should not be such a horrible thing to someone as obviously in love with the idea as you are.
Your disgusting fetishes aside, you have yet to produce a single attorney who proves Iowa doesn't know what they're talking about when they insist in order to qualify for a marriage license, the registering couple cannot be "closely related by blood or first cousins"
5 did and you are simply delusional.
Why would I care how many all male gangbangs you've been in. And I see you still have the dancing Village People person as your favorite animated character!
And no attorneys proved Iowa doesn't know what they're talking about when they say marriage licenses are not given to couples who are "closely related by blood or first cousins". And you certainly haven't proven it since you can't find one single such couple, out of a quarter of a billion eligible people, who got married in six years.
Again with the logical falicy.
I've proven.....
1. It's legal
2. You're Gay and delusional
3. You think heterosexuality is perverted.
2. You're deranged. As already stated, I'm a heterosexual man, married to a heterosexual woman. You're the one who doesn't stop posting his homoerotic fantasies on the forum.
3. See #2.