the point is not a strawman or manufactured argument. it is entirely valid as the question is....is there a time that it was right to violate the constitution. that is a very real situation and argument. prohibition and returning slaves. to drink and not return slaves were in fact a violation of the constitution.
you dismiss the point because you know to answer it blows your entire argument out the window.
My "entire argument" was that it is a bullshit point. As such there is no point answering it - to do so would imply it was not bullshit. So you are entirely correct. Well done.