It Begins … Leftist Icon Ted Ral Calls For Violent Socialist War Against Tea Partiers

Enraged at the results of the 2010 election, some leftists are no longer willing to wait quietly through the Gramscian/Fabian process of incremental totalitarianism. MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell freely admits he's a socialist. Tim Wise openly boasts of the progressive plan to obliterate America through demographics. Now Ted Rall — a fixture in the mainstream media establishment — noisily calls for an armed socialist revolution in his aptly named The Anti-American Manifesto. Excerpt via Verum Serum:


"We are here because the U.S. is going to end soon. There’s going to be an intense, violent, probably haphazard struggle for control. It’s going to come down to us versus them. The question is: What are you going to do about it?…A war is coming. At stake: our lives, the planet, freedom, living. The government, the corporations, and the extreme right are prepared to coalesce into an Axis of Evil. Are you going to fight back? Will you do whatever it takes, including taking up arms?… The millions of partisans who follow Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, and right-wing televangelists happen to be the best-armed people around, and they despise just about everyone who doesn’t think and pray like them. They will see collapse as affirmation of their beliefs that secular liberalism is destructive. They will also see it as an opportunity to create a new, ordered world atop the ashes. They will act to stop teenage sluts from getting abortions, teach n*ggers a lesson, and slaughter those spics, dots, and everyone else who doesn’t fit into their vision of what and who is right… I want to kick people in the ass. To get them thinking. To get you thinking. I want you to understand the situation—your situation. I want you to see that revolt is a good idea, and that it has never been more necessary.

Ted Rall later wrote " Can you guys read? In the excerpt from the Manifesto I explicitly state that the extreme right is better armed. That’s the problem: uneducated fools who think the earth is 6,800 years old are dangerous."

That would be a call to violence, Ted. Those are your foolish words, not mine.

Wise up.

Many Left wingers are the source of violence, from the 60's to present day, just the same except some are much older and richer.

Funny how John Podesta is also now calling for Obama to use the military to carry out his Progressive Fascist agenda

Link?


Try this one HERE

[SNIP]

“I think most of the conversation since the election has been about how President Obama adjusts to the new situation on Capitol Hill,” Center for American Progress head and former Bill Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta told the Daily Caller. “While that’s an important conversation, it simply ignores the president’s ability to use all levels of his power and authority to move the country forward.”

How does one “move the country forward”? In the center’s report, Podesta explains that Obama can use executive orders, rulemaking, and even the armed forces “to accomplish important change” and that such means “should not be underestimated.”

[/SNIP]

Okee doak?
 
Do you righties have any REAL media articles to give us or just right wing crazy shit?
 
The left causes most of the violence. Just the past two years proves the point.

I bet you guys were very proud of sending 500 union goons to harrass that 14 year old boy.

:clap2:

lying wingnuts. :cuckoo:

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQPBtFJzhnU[/ame]

Michele Bachmann Calls For Violent Revolution

Sarah Palin calls for 'revolution' in speech to tea party convention | World news | guardian.co.uk

applaud that, nutter.

No lying involved the left leads the right something to the effect of 8 to 1 in incidents.

Cry somewhere else.
 
The left causes most of the violence. Just the past two years proves the point.

I bet you guys were very proud of sending 500 union goons to harrass that 14 year old boy.

:clap2:

lying wingnuts. :cuckoo:

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQPBtFJzhnU[/ame]

Michele Bachmann Calls For Violent Revolution

Sarah Palin calls for 'revolution' in speech to tea party convention | World news | guardian.co.uk

applaud that, nutter.
There's the difference...the rightwingers elect their violent members to office.
 
[/QUOTE]
No lying involved the left leads the right something to the effect of 8 to 1 in incidents.

Cry somewhere else.[/QUOTE]

You proved nothing.

You make these claims and then provide nut ball sites as proof and even the crap on the sites you give dont prove what you claim.
 
We need to be armed to protect ourselves from loony Leftist who want to use the armed forces to pursue their failed agenda
 
There's the difference...the rightwingers elect their violent members to office.
LOL A sportsman attempting a fishing expidetion.
Try some real bait.

In the meantime would you instruct your low life to not break DNC windows and blame it on the right.
 
No lying involved the left leads the right something to the effect of 8 to 1 in incidents.

Cry somewhere else.[/QUOTE]

You proved nothing.

You make these claims and then provide nut ball sites as proof and even the crap on the sites you give dont prove what you claim.[/QUOTE]

I dont have to prove anything, current events did so for me.
 
No they dont you brick brained partisan hack.

You read right wing sites that lie to you.
 
The Washington Monthly


U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in D.C. this afternoon, allegedly committed by white supremacist James Von Brunn, Matt Yglesias noted, "I hope that everyone who mau-maued the Department of Homeland Security for expressing concern about this kind of thing feel appropriately ashamed of themselves."

It's hardly an unreasonable point. Two months ago, Richard Poplawski, a right-wing extremist, allegedly gunned down three police officers in Pittsburgh, in part because he feared the non-existent "Obama gun ban." A few weeks ago, Scott Roeder, another right-wing extremist, allegedly assassinated Dr. George Tiller in Kansas. A few hours ago, Von Brunn, another right-wing extremist, allegedly opened fire at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.
 
The Washington Monthly


U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in D.C. this afternoon, allegedly committed by white supremacist James Von Brunn, Matt Yglesias noted, "I hope that everyone who mau-maued the Department of Homeland Security for expressing concern about this kind of thing feel appropriately ashamed of themselves."

It's hardly an unreasonable point. Two months ago, Richard Poplawski, a right-wing extremist, allegedly gunned down three police officers in Pittsburgh, in part because he feared the non-existent "Obama gun ban." A few weeks ago, Scott Roeder, another right-wing extremist, allegedly assassinated Dr. George Tiller in Kansas. A few hours ago, Von Brunn, another right-wing extremist, allegedly opened fire at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Yes the left put out some cute stories then the ties to the left were discovered redndering your fiction as just that.

You need better bait.

Inform your self dumb ass museum shooter was a leftie - Bing
 
Now please note something you brick brained cons.

The left did not try to defend this guy did they?

We called hoim out for the asshole he is.

Think about WHY your side defends the violent talk on your side?
 
Now please note something you brick brained cons.

The left did not try to defend this guy did they?

We called hoim out for the asshole he is.

Think about WHY your side defends the violent talk on your side?

Bo hoo hoo

You complain of talk while committing the acts.

PISS OFF.
 
who the heck is Ted Rall?

I love it when rightwingnuts make up stuff about what other people think....

icon my butt... :cuckoo:

Yep my thoughts exactly, who is Ted Ral? Never heard of him.

A fantasy enemy concocted by right wint pundits?
They must have enemies!
 
Good grief. We have the left calling for violence against the right and the right calling for violence against the left and, instead of criticizing BOTH sides, you guys argue about who started it. Nice priority, people. Seriously.

Personally, I'm gonna go for the 'I don't care who started it, it's not fucking acceptable'.
 
Good grief. We have the left calling for violence against the right and the right calling for violence against the left and, instead of criticizing BOTH sides, you guys argue about who started it. Nice priority, people. Seriously.

Personally, I'm gonna go for the 'I don't care who started it, it's not fucking acceptable'.

It started a long time ago. This isnt a discussion about who started it for me but who has been actively involved in comitting the violence, For the last few years.

It unquestionably is the left.

But prove me wrong please. Line up the tallies , I can wait.
 
Now please note something you brick brained cons.

The left did not try to defend this guy did they?

We called hoim out for the asshole he is.

Think about WHY your side defends the violent talk on your side?

Bo hoo hoo

You complain of talk while committing the acts.

PISS OFF.

Yes you have no proof but you do have propaganda from right wing nut bag sites.

This is why we see many of you as brainwashed, YOU ARE.
 

Forum List

Back
Top