It begins Florida resident's firearms, ammunition confiscated under gun control law

MindWars

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2016
42,227
10,743
2,040
The guns and ammunition of a 56-year-old Lighthouse Point, Florida, resident were confiscated by police in what is reportedly the first such seizure under gun control laws signed by Gov. Rick Scott (R) last week.
The guns and ammunition of a 56-year-old Lighthouse Point, Florida, resident were confiscated by police in what is reportedly the first such seizure under gun control laws signed by Gov. Rick Scott (R) last week.
It Begins: Florida Resident's Firearms, Ammunition Confiscated Under Gun Control Law | Breitbart
---------------------------------------------------

This is just insane, and ever since Obama people have been saying one of the biggest way a gun grab would happen is " medical".......

The bigger problem is the DEMOTARDS are so far up their medical gods arse they believe the word of a pysch counselor who nine out of ten is a leftist liberal who has the control of peoples lives in their hands. They can often feel power in sayng whether someone is clipped or not oh and lets not forget there's little quotas in there to. That's why second opinions help but I would make sue you seek one who isn't an Anti American twit lol.

Just because they title you with something does not mean it is true. There aren't even any true methods of proving mental illness.



 
If the man is so dangerous, then why isn’t he being locked up in a mental hospital?

This is what is wrong with Dems, they think taking guns away will solve the problem, when mentally ill and thugs are still allowed to roam free.
 
The guy thinks he's being stalked by the FBI and a shape shifting neighbor who can get taller or shorter at will, and looks a lot like Osama Bin Laden. The nut also cut off the electricity to his entire apartment complex because he said they were electrocuting him through his legs. Of course, the NRA still stands firm on him keeping his 2nd amendment rights. Isn't this the same situation everybody has been whining about with the latest school shooter?
 
The guy thinks he's being stalked by the FBI and a shape shifting neighbor who can get taller or shorter at will, and looks a lot like Osama Bin Laden. The nut also cut off the electricity to his entire apartment complex because he said they were electrocuting him through his legs. Of course, the NRA still stands firm on him keeping his 2nd amendment rights. Isn't this the same situation everybody has been whining about with the latest school shooter?
He should be committed. So should all democrats.
 
If the man is so dangerous, then why isn’t he being locked up in a mental hospital?

This is what is wrong with Dems, they think taking guns away will solve the problem, when mentally ill and thugs are still allowed to roam free.


Can't lock somebody up for being crazy. They have to be a danger to themselves or others. He never threatened to shoot anybody yet, but..........
 
The guy thinks he's being stalked by the FBI and a shape shifting neighbor who can get taller or shorter at will, and looks a lot like Osama Bin Laden. The nut also cut off the electricity to his entire apartment complex because he said they were electrocuting him through his legs. Of course, the NRA still stands firm on him keeping his 2nd amendment rights. Isn't this the same situation everybody has been whining about with the latest school shooter?
He should be committed. So should all democrats.

Why don't you bring that up at the next city council meeting? dumb ass.
 
Florida now has its first citizen with 'standing' in the court to challenge the Constitutionality of this law.

Hopefully, the citizens of this state and the NRA will start a go fund me to pay the legal bills.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
If the man is so dangerous, then why isn’t he being locked up in a mental hospital?

This is what is wrong with Dems, they think taking guns away will solve the problem, when mentally ill and thugs are still allowed to roam free.

He's not dangerous, do we not get how the medical field can PLAY WITH YOUR LIFE titling you as anything they want and because they are in those positions abuse of powers are so, so easy.

They can say anyone reading this has a mental illeness...... it is that easy.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
The man was also taken to a hospital for involuntary psychiatric treatment under the state’s Baker Act.

upload_2018-3-17_8-48-19.png



It’s Happening: Confiscation Begins After Florida’s New Gun Control Laws Enacted
 
The guns and ammunition of a 56-year-old Lighthouse Point, Florida, resident were confiscated by police in what is reportedly the first such seizure under gun control laws signed by Gov. Rick Scott (R) last week.
The guns and ammunition of a 56-year-old Lighthouse Point, Florida, resident were confiscated by police in what is reportedly the first such seizure under gun control laws signed by Gov. Rick Scott (R) last week.
It Begins: Florida Resident's Firearms, Ammunition Confiscated Under Gun Control Law | Breitbart
---------------------------------------------------

This is just insane, and ever since Obama people have been saying one of the biggest way a gun grab would happen is " medical".......

The bigger problem is the DEMOTARDS are so far up their medical gods arse they believe the word of a pysch counselor who nine out of ten is a leftist liberal who has the control of peoples lives in their hands. They can often feel power in sayng whether someone is clipped or not oh and lets not forget there's little quotas in there to. That's why second opinions help but I would make sue you seek one who isn't an Anti American twit lol.

Just because they title you with something does not mean it is true. There aren't even any true methods of proving mental illness.

Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well.

We should not have any security problems in our free States.
 
If the man is so dangerous, then why isn’t he being locked up in a mental hospital?

This is what is wrong with Dems, they think taking guns away will solve the problem, when mentally ill and thugs are still allowed to roam free.


Can't lock somebody up for being crazy. They have to be a danger to themselves or others. He never threatened to shoot anybody yet, but..........
Then why take his guns? ......
 
If the man is so dangerous, then why isn’t he being locked up in a mental hospital?

This is what is wrong with Dems, they think taking guns away will solve the problem, when mentally ill and thugs are still allowed to roam free.

He's not dangerous, do we not get how the medical field can PLAY WITH YOUR LIFE titling you as anything they want and because they are in those positions abuse of powers are so, so easy.

They can say anyone reading this has a mental illeness...... it is that easy.

After reading your posts, it wouldn't be hard for me say you're nuts.
 
If the man is so dangerous, then why isn’t he being locked up in a mental hospital?

This is what is wrong with Dems, they think taking guns away will solve the problem, when mentally ill and thugs are still allowed to roam free.


Can't lock somebody up for being crazy. They have to be a danger to themselves or others. He never threatened to shoot anybody yet, but..........
If he is not a threat to himself or others why were his firearms removed again?
 
If the man is so dangerous, then why isn’t he being locked up in a mental hospital?

This is what is wrong with Dems, they think taking guns away will solve the problem, when mentally ill and thugs are still allowed to roam free.


Can't lock somebody up for being crazy. They have to be a danger to themselves or others. He never threatened to shoot anybody yet, but..........
Then why take his guns? ......

Because he is nuts and well armed.
 
If the man is so dangerous, then why isn’t he being locked up in a mental hospital?

This is what is wrong with Dems, they think taking guns away will solve the problem, when mentally ill and thugs are still allowed to roam free.


Can't lock somebody up for being crazy. They have to be a danger to themselves or others. He never threatened to shoot anybody yet, but..........
Then why take his guns? ......

Because he is nuts and well armed.
Ahh so even though he has never threatened anyone never espoused a threatening tone or demeanor your bar for removing weapons is so low as to be none existent.
 
Emotion rules the day...now we will see what the SCOTUS will say...
 

Forum List

Back
Top