Israel lambasted over 'abusive arrests' of Palestinian children

[Hollie]

Why don't you try throwing a brick at at cop's head, and see what happens?

I'm not a ten or eleven year old child that knows better, besides Israel will never cower people willing to die for their freedom from a brutal occupation

So if a juvenile throws a brick at a cop's head here in the U.S., the cop won't pop like 10 bullets into him for threatening his life? You is funny.

It is you that is wacked and funny comparing the USA to the Pariah State occupying the Palestinians by force...

Join Hollywood as one of the Iranian Sheiks of Sunset point, you'll love the glitter! LOL

Who is occupying these so-called "Palestinians" you're whining about?

How is there an occupation when there is, you know, no occupation?

Why are you employing Islamo-taqiyya?

Hollie:
How is there an occupation when there is, you know, no occupation?


Hollie, you're way dumber than I thought!

Israeli-occupied territories
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
The Israeli-occupied territories are the territories occupied by Israel during the Six-Day War of 1967 from Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. They consist of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem; much of the Golan Heights; the Gaza Strip, and, until 1982, the Sinai Peninsula. Israel maintains that the West Bank is disputed territory[1] and asserts that since the disengagement from Gaza in 2005, it no longer occupies it.[2] The West Bank and Gaza Strip are also referred to as the Palestinian territories or Occupied Palestinian Territory. The Palestinian Authority, the EU,[3] the International Court of Justice,[4] the UN General Assembly[5] and the UN Security Council[6] consider East Jerusalem to be part of the West Bank and occupied by Israel; Israel considers all of Jerusalem to be its capital and sovereign territory.[7] West Jerusalem is considered to be occupied by Arab and Palestinian representatives.[8]

The International Court of Justice,[4] the UN General Assembly[5] and the United Nations Security Council regards Israel as the "Occupying Power".[9] UN Special Rapporteur Richard Falk called Israel’s occupation "an affront to international law."[10] The Israeli High Court of Justice has ruled that Israel holds the West Bank under "belligerent occupation".[11] According to Talia Sasson, the High Court of Justice in Israel, with a variety of different justices sitting, has repeatedly stated for more than four decades that Israel’s presence in the West Bank is in violation of international law.[12]

Israeli governments have preferred the term "disputed territories" in the case of the West Bank.[13][14]

The first use of the term 'territories occupied' was in United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 following the Six-Day War in 1967, which called for "the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East" to be achieved by "the application of both the following principles: ... Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict ... Termination of all claims or states of belligerency" and respect for the right of every state in the area to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries.

Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem in 1980 (see Jerusalem Law) and the Golan Heights in 1981 (see Golan Heights Law) has not been recognised by any other country.[15] United Nations Security Council Resolution 478 declared the annexation of Jerusalem "null and void" and required that it be rescinded. United Nations Security Council Resolution 497 also declared the annexation of the Golan "null and void". Following withdrawal by Israel from the Sinai Peninsula in 1982, as part of the 1979 Israel–Egypt Peace Treaty, the Sinai ceased to be considered occupied territory. Israel unilaterally disengaged from Gaza in September 2005, and declared itself no longer to be in occupation of the Strip. However, as it retains control of Gaza's airspace and coastline, it continues to be designated as an occupying power in the Gaza Strip by the United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly[16] and some countries and various human rights organizations.[17][18][19][20]

That's the usual cut and paste that Islamics use in futile attempts to bolster their whining about "occupation".

So where is this alleged "occupation" taking place when there is no occupation? You're confused with terms and definitions.

 

[Roudy]

Why don't you try throwing a brick at at cop's head, and see what happens?

I'm not a ten or eleven year old child that knows better, besides Israel will never cower people willing to die for their freedom from a brutal occupation

So if a juvenile throws a brick at a cop's head here in the U.S., the cop won't pop like 10 bullets into him for threatening his life? You is funny.

It is you that is wacked and funny comparing the USA to the Pariah State occupying the Palestinians by force...

Join Hollywood as one of the Iranian Sheiks of Sunset point, you'll love the glitter! LOL

Who is occupying these so-called "Palestinians" you're whining about?

How is there an occupation when there is, you know, no occupation?

Why are you employing Islamo-taqiyya?

Hollie:
How is there an occupation when there is, you know, no occupation?


Hollie, you're way dumber than I thought!

Israeli-occupied territories
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
The Israeli-occupied territories are the territories occupied by Israel during the Six-Day War of 1967 from Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. They consist of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem; much of the Golan Heights; the Gaza Strip, and, until 1982, the Sinai Peninsula. Israel maintains that the West Bank is disputed territory[1] and asserts that since the disengagement from Gaza in 2005, it no longer occupies it.[2] The West Bank and Gaza Strip are also referred to as the Palestinian territories or Occupied Palestinian Territory. The Palestinian Authority, the EU,[3] the International Court of Justice,[4] the UN General Assembly[5] and the UN Security Council[6] consider East Jerusalem to be part of the West Bank and occupied by Israel; Israel considers all of Jerusalem to be its capital and sovereign territory.[7] West Jerusalem is considered to be occupied by Arab and Palestinian representatives.[8]

The International Court of Justice,[4] the UN General Assembly[5] and the United Nations Security Council regards Israel as the "Occupying Power".[9] UN Special Rapporteur Richard Falk called Israel’s occupation "an affront to international law."[10] The Israeli High Court of Justice has ruled that Israel holds the West Bank under "belligerent occupation".[11] According to Talia Sasson, the High Court of Justice in Israel, with a variety of different justices sitting, has repeatedly stated for more than four decades that Israel’s presence in the West Bank is in violation of international law.[12]

Israeli governments have preferred the term "disputed territories" in the case of the West Bank.[13][14]

The first use of the term 'territories occupied' was in United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 following the Six-Day War in 1967, which called for "the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East" to be achieved by "the application of both the following principles: ... Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict ... Termination of all claims or states of belligerency" and respect for the right of every state in the area to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries.

Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem in 1980 (see Jerusalem Law) and the Golan Heights in 1981 (see Golan Heights Law) has not been recognised by any other country.[15] United Nations Security Council Resolution 478 declared the annexation of Jerusalem "null and void" and required that it be rescinded. United Nations Security Council Resolution 497 also declared the annexation of the Golan "null and void". Following withdrawal by Israel from the Sinai Peninsula in 1982, as part of the 1979 Israel–Egypt Peace Treaty, the Sinai ceased to be considered occupied territory. Israel unilaterally disengaged from Gaza in September 2005, and declared itself no longer to be in occupation of the Strip. However, as it retains control of Gaza's airspace and coastline, it continues to be designated as an occupying power in the Gaza Strip by the United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly[16] and some countries and various human rights organizations.[17][18][19][20]

Since there was never a Palestinian state, there is nothing to "occupy". It's captured territory as a result of five Arab nations attacking Israel in 1967 which happens to also be Judeah and Samaria of ancient Israel. Of course non of the wars against Israel were because the Arabs wanted to create this mythical Palestinian state, instead it was always to destroy the Jewish state and divide the proceeds between themselves.

Is Israel Truly an ‘Occupying Power’?
Over at Commentary, Jonathan Tobin is providing excellent coverage of and commentary on the Levy Report, a report by retired Israel Supreme Court justice Edmund Levy finding — among other things — that in the West Bank “Israel does not meet the criteria of ‘military occupation’ as defined under international law.” While the report has been immediately condemned in all the predictable quarters, it’s important to back up and ask an important question: If Israeli governance of the West Bank is truly an “occupation,” then whose territory is being occupied?

Remember, there has never been a recognized Palestinian state in the West Bank. The Palestinians (and surrounding Arab states) rejected the 1947 U.N. Partition Plan for Palestine, which would have created separate Palestinian and Jewish states and chose instead to launch the first of several attempts to destroy Israel and initiate a second Jewish genocide. The 1949 armistice didn’t create a Palestinian state in either the West Bank or Gaza. Egypt took control of Gaza, and Jordan took control of the West Bank. Consequently, when Israel defeated the Arab world’s second major genocide attempt in 1967, it took Gaza and the West Bank not from the Palestinians but from Egypt and Jordan. Israel isn’t occupying Jordanian territory, the Palestinians rejected statehood in 1947 (before the outbreak of war), and while Israel can’t make a clean and exclusive claim to Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), it’s difficult to claim that Israel is “occupying” land that has not since the end of the colonial era definitively belonged to any state. The best phrase to use is “disputed territory.”

I agree with the Jonathan Tobin that the language of “occupation” has done terrible damage not only to the justice of Israel’s claims but also to the hope for peace itself. Occupations under international law must be temporary and thus the Palestinians begin with the default bargaining position of possessing the entirety of the occupied land. Disputed territory, on the other hand, does not yet definitively belong to any power, and its final status is presumed to be settled through negotiation and compromise. The Palestinians begin every negotiation with most of the world community viewing Israel’s occupation as illegal and with the firm conviction that they are entitled by right to 100 percent of Judea and Samaria and that any post-1949 Jewish presence on their land is unlawful. This is not a recipe for compromise, even if Palestinians were predisposed to anything other than the destruction of Israel.

There’s been much talk of “reset buttons” in international affairs. I propose a reset button on the language of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

 

[Roudy]

I'm not a ten or eleven year old child that knows better, besides Israel will never cower people willing to die for their freedom from a brutal occupation

So if a juvenile throws a brick at a cop's head here in the U.S., the cop won't pop like 10 bullets into him for threatening his life? You is funny.

It is you that is wacked and funny comparing the USA to the Pariah State occupying the Palestinians by force...

Join Hollywood as one of the Iranian Sheiks of Sunset point, you'll love the glitter! LOL

Who is occupying these so-called "Palestinians" you're whining about?

How is there an occupation when there is, you know, no occupation?

Why are you employing Islamo-taqiyya?

Hollie:
How is there an occupation when there is, you know, no occupation?


Hollie, you're way dumber than I thought!

Israeli-occupied territories
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
The Israeli-occupied territories are the territories occupied by Israel during the Six-Day War of 1967 from Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. They consist of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem; much of the Golan Heights; the Gaza Strip, and, until 1982, the Sinai Peninsula. Israel maintains that the West Bank is disputed territory[1] and asserts that since the disengagement from Gaza in 2005, it no longer occupies it.[2] The West Bank and Gaza Strip are also referred to as the Palestinian territories or Occupied Palestinian Territory. The Palestinian Authority, the EU,[3] the International Court of Justice,[4] the UN General Assembly[5] and the UN Security Council[6] consider East Jerusalem to be part of the West Bank and occupied by Israel; Israel considers all of Jerusalem to be its capital and sovereign territory.[7] West Jerusalem is considered to be occupied by Arab and Palestinian representatives.[8]

The International Court of Justice,[4] the UN General Assembly[5] and the United Nations Security Council regards Israel as the "Occupying Power".[9] UN Special Rapporteur Richard Falk called Israel’s occupation "an affront to international law."[10] The Israeli High Court of Justice has ruled that Israel holds the West Bank under "belligerent occupation".[11] According to Talia Sasson, the High Court of Justice in Israel, with a variety of different justices sitting, has repeatedly stated for more than four decades that Israel’s presence in the West Bank is in violation of international law.[12]

Israeli governments have preferred the term "disputed territories" in the case of the West Bank.[13][14]

The first use of the term 'territories occupied' was in United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 following the Six-Day War in 1967, which called for "the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East" to be achieved by "the application of both the following principles: ... Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict ... Termination of all claims or states of belligerency" and respect for the right of every state in the area to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries.

Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem in 1980 (see Jerusalem Law) and the Golan Heights in 1981 (see Golan Heights Law) has not been recognised by any other country.[15] United Nations Security Council Resolution 478 declared the annexation of Jerusalem "null and void" and required that it be rescinded. United Nations Security Council Resolution 497 also declared the annexation of the Golan "null and void". Following withdrawal by Israel from the Sinai Peninsula in 1982, as part of the 1979 Israel–Egypt Peace Treaty, the Sinai ceased to be considered occupied territory. Israel unilaterally disengaged from Gaza in September 2005, and declared itself no longer to be in occupation of the Strip. However, as it retains control of Gaza's airspace and coastline, it continues to be designated as an occupying power in the Gaza Strip by the United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly[16] and some countries and various human rights organizations.[17][18][19][20]

That's the usual cut and paste that Islamics use in futile attempts to bolster their whining about "occupation".

So where is this alleged "occupation" taking place when there is no occupation? You're confused with terms and definitions.

Besides, I don't understand why Little Peeballs Mussolini is using Wikipedia which, according to MonkeyNazi, is an unreliable "Hasbara site".

 

[pbel]

So if a juvenile throws a brick at a cop's head here in the U.S., the cop won't pop like 10 bullets into him for threatening his life? You is funny.

It is you that is wacked and funny comparing the USA to the Pariah State occupying the Palestinians by force...

Join Hollywood as one of the Iranian Sheiks of Sunset point, you'll love the glitter! LOL

Who is occupying these so-called "Palestinians" you're whining about?

How is there an occupation when there is, you know, no occupation?

Why are you employing Islamo-taqiyya?

Hollie:
How is there an occupation when there is, you know, no occupation?


Hollie, you're way dumber than I thought!

Israeli-occupied territories
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
The Israeli-occupied territories are the territories occupied by Israel during the Six-Day War of 1967 from Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. They consist of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem; much of the Golan Heights; the Gaza Strip, and, until 1982, the Sinai Peninsula. Israel maintains that the West Bank is disputed territory[1] and asserts that since the disengagement from Gaza in 2005, it no longer occupies it.[2] The West Bank and Gaza Strip are also referred to as the Palestinian territories or Occupied Palestinian Territory. The Palestinian Authority, the EU,[3] the International Court of Justice,[4] the UN General Assembly[5] and the UN Security Council[6] consider East Jerusalem to be part of the West Bank and occupied by Israel; Israel considers all of Jerusalem to be its capital and sovereign territory.[7] West Jerusalem is considered to be occupied by Arab and Palestinian representatives.[8]

The International Court of Justice,[4] the UN General Assembly[5] and the United Nations Security Council regards Israel as the "Occupying Power".[9] UN Special Rapporteur Richard Falk called Israel’s occupation "an affront to international law."[10] The Israeli High Court of Justice has ruled that Israel holds the West Bank under "belligerent occupation".[11] According to Talia Sasson, the High Court of Justice in Israel, with a variety of different justices sitting, has repeatedly stated for more than four decades that Israel’s presence in the West Bank is in violation of international law.[12]

Israeli governments have preferred the term "disputed territories" in the case of the West Bank.[13][14]

The first use of the term 'territories occupied' was in United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 following the Six-Day War in 1967, which called for "the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East" to be achieved by "the application of both the following principles: ... Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict ... Termination of all claims or states of belligerency" and respect for the right of every state in the area to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries.

Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem in 1980 (see Jerusalem Law) and the Golan Heights in 1981 (see Golan Heights Law) has not been recognised by any other country.[15] United Nations Security Council Resolution 478 declared the annexation of Jerusalem "null and void" and required that it be rescinded. United Nations Security Council Resolution 497 also declared the annexation of the Golan "null and void". Following withdrawal by Israel from the Sinai Peninsula in 1982, as part of the 1979 Israel–Egypt Peace Treaty, the Sinai ceased to be considered occupied territory. Israel unilaterally disengaged from Gaza in September 2005, and declared itself no longer to be in occupation of the Strip. However, as it retains control of Gaza's airspace and coastline, it continues to be designated as an occupying power in the Gaza Strip by the United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly[16] and some countries and various human rights organizations.[17][18][19][20]

That's the usual cut and paste that Islamics use in futile attempts to bolster their whining about "occupation".

So where is this alleged "occupation" taking place when there is no occupation? You're confused with terms and definitions.

Besides, I don't understand why Little Peeballs Mussolini is using Wikipedia which, according to MonkeyNazi, is an unreliable "Hasbara site".

Two whack jobs for the price of one!! Hollie and Pedo!

 

[Billo_Really]

Since there was never a Palestinian state, there is nothing to "occupy". It's captured territory as a result of five Arab nations attacking Israel in 1967 which happens to also be Judeah and Samaria of ancient Israel. Of course non of the wars against Israel were because the Arabs wanted to create this mythical Palestinian state, instead it was always to destroy the Jewish state and divide the proceeds between themselves.

Is Israel Truly an ‘Occupying Power’?
Over at Commentary, Jonathan Tobin is providing excellent coverage of and commentary on the Levy Report, a report by retired Israel Supreme Court justice Edmund Levy finding — among other things — that in the West Bank “Israel does not meet the criteria of ‘military occupation’ as defined under international law.” While the report has been immediately condemned in all the predictable quarters, it’s important to back up and ask an important question: If Israeli governance of the West Bank is truly an “occupation,” then whose territory is being occupied?

Remember, there has never been a recognized Palestinian state in the West Bank. The Palestinians (and surrounding Arab states) rejected the 1947 U.N. Partition Plan for Palestine, which would have created separate Palestinian and Jewish states and chose instead to launch the first of several attempts to destroy Israel and initiate a second Jewish genocide. The 1949 armistice didn’t create a Palestinian state in either the West Bank or Gaza. Egypt took control of Gaza, and Jordan took control of the West Bank. Consequently, when Israel defeated the Arab world’s second major genocide attempt in 1967, it took Gaza and the West Bank not from the Palestinians but from Egypt and Jordan. Israel isn’t occupying Jordanian territory, the Palestinians rejected statehood in 1947 (before the outbreak of war), and while Israel can’t make a clean and exclusive claim to Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), it’s difficult to claim that Israel is “occupying” land that has not since the end of the colonial era definitively belonged to any state. The best phrase to use is “disputed territory.”

I agree with the Jonathan Tobin that the language of “occupation” has done terrible damage not only to the justice of Israel’s claims but also to the hope for peace itself. Occupations under international law must be temporary and thus the Palestinians begin with the default bargaining position of possessing the entirety of the occupied land. Disputed territory, on the other hand, does not yet definitively belong to any power, and its final status is presumed to be settled through negotiation and compromise. The Palestinians begin every negotiation with most of the world community viewing Israel’s occupation as illegal and with the firm conviction that they are entitled by right to 100 percent of Judea and Samaria and that any post-1949 Jewish presence on their land is unlawful. This is not a recipe for compromise, even if Palestinians were predisposed to anything other than the destruction of Israel.

There’s been much talk of “reset buttons” in international affairs. I propose a reset button on the language of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The problem with that Levy Report, is that it is irrelevant to who's territory it is. The "occupation" is defined as "a foreign force occupying a territory it has no clear title to".

So it doesn't matter who's terroritory it is, it only matters that it is not Israel's.

 

[Billo_Really]

That's the usual cut and paste that Islamics use in futile attempts to bolster their whining about "occupation".

So where is this alleged "occupation" taking place when there is no occupation? You're confused with terms and definitions.

You are one sick piece of shit.

It's been an occupation for the last 50 years and your dumb, skank ass, ain't changing things now.

 

[Billo_Really]

Your source is HRW that well known pro islamonazi terrorist defender that only uses "Palestinian sources" for its evidence. All you are doing is inciting racial hatred of the Jews because your imam has told you to.

Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.

 

[Billo_Really]

Little Mussolini is trying to tell us that only Palisimians are allowed to throw big rocks at people and get away with it, as long as the people the rocks are being thrown at are Jooooos.

They're not allowed to throw rocks, you stupid, sick racist. They get a 20 year prison sentence, if they do.

Do you think its okay to torture children?

 

[Billo_Really]

Who is occupying these so-called "Palestinians" you're whining about?

How is there an occupation when there is, you know, no occupation?

Why are you employing Islamo-taqiyya?

You're the one who appears to be whining.

 

[Billo_Really]

Isn'tit just awful Pbel? Do you think maybe the little Pali children bastards should stop with their stone throwing to incite riots?

End the occupation and you won't get stones.

Stop torturing children and you won't get stones.

Or just shut your fucking, racist mouth and they won't throw stones.

 

[Billo_Really]

So if a juvenile throws a brick at a cop's head here in the U.S., the cop won't pop like 10 bullets into him for threatening his life? You is funny.

Why don't you eat a fucking brick and see if you can shit it out the other end. And if you do, name it "Hollie".

Even if they cannot prove the "stone thrower" was intending harm, the child could still get a 10 year prison sentence, according to a new law by the Knesset.

Netanyahu's cabinet backs bill to jail stone-throwers up to 10-20 years
Amendment will make it possible to convict and punish the violators even if the state cannot prove they intended to damage cars or injure passengers; bill must still be brought to Knesset for approval.

This is more proof that Israel is one sick society.

 

[Billo_Really]

Oh I see, those little bastards throwing rocks should be stoned tortured and murdered by sick ZioNazis like you, I see..

I bet he likes watching children being tortured on some sick Israeli cable channel, completely naked, holding a beer with a big cheeseburger resting on the head of his dick!

Israel also uses children as human shields.

Israeli soldiers had used Palestinian children to enter potentially dangerous buildings before them and to stand in front of military vehicles to deter stone-throwing, it said.

"Almost all those using children as human shields and informants have remained unpunished and the soldiers convicted for having forced at gunpoint a nine-year-old child to search bags suspected of containing explosives only received a suspended sentence of three months and were demoted," it said.​

 

[Roudy]

Since there was never a Palestinian state, there is nothing to "occupy". It's captured territory as a result of five Arab nations attacking Israel in 1967 which happens to also be Judeah and Samaria of ancient Israel. Of course non of the wars against Israel were because the Arabs wanted to create this mythical Palestinian state, instead it was always to destroy the Jewish state and divide the proceeds between themselves.

Is Israel Truly an ‘Occupying Power’?
Over at Commentary, Jonathan Tobin is providing excellent coverage of and commentary on the Levy Report, a report by retired Israel Supreme Court justice Edmund Levy finding — among other things — that in the West Bank “Israel does not meet the criteria of ‘military occupation’ as defined under international law.” While the report has been immediately condemned in all the predictable quarters, it’s important to back up and ask an important question: If Israeli governance of the West Bank is truly an “occupation,” then whose territory is being occupied?

Remember, there has never been a recognized Palestinian state in the West Bank. The Palestinians (and surrounding Arab states) rejected the 1947 U.N. Partition Plan for Palestine, which would have created separate Palestinian and Jewish states and chose instead to launch the first of several attempts to destroy Israel and initiate a second Jewish genocide. The 1949 armistice didn’t create a Palestinian state in either the West Bank or Gaza. Egypt took control of Gaza, and Jordan took control of the West Bank. Consequently, when Israel defeated the Arab world’s second major genocide attempt in 1967, it took Gaza and the West Bank not from the Palestinians but from Egypt and Jordan. Israel isn’t occupying Jordanian territory, the Palestinians rejected statehood in 1947 (before the outbreak of war), and while Israel can’t make a clean and exclusive claim to Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), it’s difficult to claim that Israel is “occupying” land that has not since the end of the colonial era definitively belonged to any state. The best phrase to use is “disputed territory.”

I agree with the Jonathan Tobin that the language of “occupation” has done terrible damage not only to the justice of Israel’s claims but also to the hope for peace itself. Occupations under international law must be temporary and thus the Palestinians begin with the default bargaining position of possessing the entirety of the occupied land. Disputed territory, on the other hand, does not yet definitively belong to any power, and its final status is presumed to be settled through negotiation and compromise. The Palestinians begin every negotiation with most of the world community viewing Israel’s occupation as illegal and with the firm conviction that they are entitled by right to 100 percent of Judea and Samaria and that any post-1949 Jewish presence on their land is unlawful. This is not a recipe for compromise, even if Palestinians were predisposed to anything other than the destruction of Israel.

There’s been much talk of “reset buttons” in international affairs. I propose a reset button on the language of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The problem with that Levy Report, is that it is irrelevant to who's territory it is. The "occupation" is defined as "a foreign force occupying a territory it has no clear title to".

So it doesn't matter who's terroritory it is, it only matters that it is not Israel's.

Well which country are they occupying? Who's territory was it? Who would the Israelis give these lands back to?

The West Bank and Gaza were "occupied" by Jordan and Egypt for 20 years. How come there wasn't a peep from anybody about this mythical "Palestine"?

 

[Roudy]

So if a juvenile throws a brick at a cop's head here in the U.S., the cop won't pop like 10 bullets into him for threatening his life? You is funny.

Why don't you eat a fucking brick and see if you can shit it out the other end. And if you do, name it "Hollie".

Even if they cannot prove the "stone thrower" was intending harm, the child could still get a 10 year prison sentence, according to a new law by the Knesset.

Netanyahu's cabinet backs bill to jail stone-throwers up to 10-20 years
Amendment will make it possible to convict and punish the violators even if the state cannot prove they intended to damage cars or injure passengers; bill must still be brought to Knesset for approval.

This is more proof that Israel is one sick society.

Yeah? What happened when you assault a police officer with deadly force? How many years do you get for that?

 

[Roudy]

Oh I see, those little bastards throwing rocks should be stoned tortured and murdered by sick ZioNazis like you, I see..

I bet he likes watching children being tortured on some sick Israeli cable channel, completely naked, holding a beer with a big cheeseburger resting on the head of his dick!

Israel also uses children as human shields.

Israeli soldiers had used Palestinian children to enter potentially dangerous buildings before them and to stand in front of military vehicles to deter stone-throwing, it said.

"Almost all those using children as human shields and informants have remained unpunished and the soldiers convicted for having forced at gunpoint a nine-year-old child to search bags suspected of containing explosives only received a suspended sentence of three months and were demoted," it said.​

Really now? Palestinians have the market on using children as human shields cornered, you big mouth with low IQ dickhead.

 

[Phoenall]

Why don't you try throwing a brick at at cop's head, and see what happens?

I'm not a ten or eleven year old child that knows better, besides Israel will never cower people willing to die for their freedom from a brutal occupation

So if a juvenile throws a brick at a cop's head here in the U.S., the cop won't pop like 10 bullets into him for threatening his life? You is funny.

It is you that is wacked and funny comparing the USA to the Pariah State occupying the Palestinians by force...

Join Hollywood as one of the Iranian Sheiks of Sunset point, you'll love the glitter! LOL

Little Mussolini is trying to tell us that only Palisimians are allowed to throw big rocks at people and get away with it, as long as the people the rocks are being thrown at are Jooooos.

You always get it wrong Pedo, children should not be tortured...

Like the Palestinians do to their own children, plenty of evidence of this torture on the internet if you bother to look.

 

[Phoenall]

Why don't you try throwing a brick at at cop's head, and see what happens?

I'm not a ten or eleven year old child that knows better, besides Israel will never cower people willing to die for their freedom from a brutal occupation

So if a juvenile throws a brick at a cop's head here in the U.S., the cop won't pop like 10 bullets into him for threatening his life? You is funny.

It is you that is wacked and funny comparing the USA to the Pariah State occupying the Palestinians by force...

Join Hollywood as one of the Iranian Sheiks of Sunset point, you'll love the glitter! LOL

Who is occupying these so-called "Palestinians" you're whining about?

How is there an occupation when there is, you know, no occupation?

Why are you employing Islamo-taqiyya?

Hollie:
How is there an occupation when there is, you know, no occupation?


Hollie, you're way dumber than I thought!

Israeli-occupied territories
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
The Israeli-occupied territories are the territories occupied by Israel during the Six-Day War of 1967 from Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. They consist of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem; much of the Golan Heights; the Gaza Strip, and, until 1982, the Sinai Peninsula. Israel maintains that the West Bank is disputed territory[1] and asserts that since the disengagement from Gaza in 2005, it no longer occupies it.[2] The West Bank and Gaza Strip are also referred to as the Palestinian territories or Occupied Palestinian Territory. The Palestinian Authority, the EU,[3] the International Court of Justice,[4] the UN General Assembly[5] and the UN Security Council[6] consider East Jerusalem to be part of the West Bank and occupied by Israel; Israel considers all of Jerusalem to be its capital and sovereign territory.[7] West Jerusalem is considered to be occupied by Arab and Palestinian representatives.[8]

The International Court of Justice,[4] the UN General Assembly[5] and the United Nations Security Council regards Israel as the "Occupying Power".[9] UN Special Rapporteur Richard Falk called Israel’s occupation "an affront to international law."[10] The Israeli High Court of Justice has ruled that Israel holds the West Bank under "belligerent occupation".[11] According to Talia Sasson, the High Court of Justice in Israel, with a variety of different justices sitting, has repeatedly stated for more than four decades that Israel’s presence in the West Bank is in violation of international law.[12]

Israeli governments have preferred the term "disputed territories" in the case of the West Bank.[13][14]

The first use of the term 'territories occupied' was in United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 following the Six-Day War in 1967, which called for "the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East" to be achieved by "the application of both the following principles: ... Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict ... Termination of all claims or states of belligerency" and respect for the right of every state in the area to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries.

Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem in 1980 (see Jerusalem Law) and the Golan Heights in 1981 (see Golan Heights Law) has not been recognised by any other country.[15] United Nations Security Council Resolution 478 declared the annexation of Jerusalem "null and void" and required that it be rescinded. United Nations Security Council Resolution 497 also declared the annexation of the Golan "null and void". Following withdrawal by Israel from the Sinai Peninsula in 1982, as part of the 1979 Israel–Egypt Peace Treaty, the Sinai ceased to be considered occupied territory. Israel unilaterally disengaged from Gaza in September 2005, and declared itself no longer to be in occupation of the Strip. However, as it retains control of Gaza's airspace and coastline, it continues to be designated as an occupying power in the Gaza Strip by the United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly[16] and some countries and various human rights organizations.[17][18][19][20]

So when will the arab muslims negotiate secure and recognised boundaries and then stop all acts of belligerence ?

 

[Phoenall]

Why don't you try throwing a brick at at cop's head, and see what happens?

I'm not a ten or eleven year old child that knows better, besides Israel will never cower people willing to die for their freedom from a brutal occupation

So if a juvenile throws a brick at a cop's head here in the U.S., the cop won't pop like 10 bullets into him for threatening his life? You is funny.

It is you that is wacked and funny comparing the USA to the Pariah State occupying the Palestinians by force...

Join Hollywood as one of the Iranian Sheiks of Sunset point, you'll love the glitter! LOL

Who is occupying these so-called "Palestinians" you're whining about?

How is there an occupation when there is, you know, no occupation?

Why are you employing Islamo-taqiyya?

Hollie:
How is there an occupation when there is, you know, no occupation?


Hollie, you're way dumber than I thought!

Israeli-occupied territories
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
The Israeli-occupied territories are the territories occupied by Israel during the Six-Day War of 1967 from Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. They consist of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem; much of the Golan Heights; the Gaza Strip, and, until 1982, the Sinai Peninsula. Israel maintains that the West Bank is disputed territory[1] and asserts that since the disengagement from Gaza in 2005, it no longer occupies it.[2] The West Bank and Gaza Strip are also referred to as the Palestinian territories or Occupied Palestinian Territory. The Palestinian Authority, the EU,[3] the International Court of Justice,[4] the UN General Assembly[5] and the UN Security Council[6] consider East Jerusalem to be part of the West Bank and occupied by Israel; Israel considers all of Jerusalem to be its capital and sovereign territory.[7] West Jerusalem is considered to be occupied by Arab and Palestinian representatives.[8]

The International Court of Justice,[4] the UN General Assembly[5] and the United Nations Security Council regards Israel as the "Occupying Power".[9] UN Special Rapporteur Richard Falk called Israel’s occupation "an affront to international law."[10] The Israeli High Court of Justice has ruled that Israel holds the West Bank under "belligerent occupation".[11] According to Talia Sasson, the High Court of Justice in Israel, with a variety of different justices sitting, has repeatedly stated for more than four decades that Israel’s presence in the West Bank is in violation of international law.[12]

Israeli governments have preferred the term "disputed territories" in the case of the West Bank.[13][14]

The first use of the term 'territories occupied' was in United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 following the Six-Day War in 1967, which called for "the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East" to be achieved by "the application of both the following principles: ... Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict ... Termination of all claims or states of belligerency" and respect for the right of every state in the area to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries.

Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem in 1980 (see Jerusalem Law) and the Golan Heights in 1981 (see Golan Heights Law) has not been recognised by any other country.[15] United Nations Security Council Resolution 478 declared the annexation of Jerusalem "null and void" and required that it be rescinded. United Nations Security Council Resolution 497 also declared the annexation of the Golan "null and void". Following withdrawal by Israel from the Sinai Peninsula in 1982, as part of the 1979 Israel–Egypt Peace Treaty, the Sinai ceased to be considered occupied territory. Israel unilaterally disengaged from Gaza in September 2005, and declared itself no longer to be in occupation of the Strip. However, as it retains control of Gaza's airspace and coastline, it continues to be designated as an occupying power in the Gaza Strip by the United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly[16] and some countries and various human rights organizations.[17][18][19][20]

So when will the arab muslims negotiate secure and recognised boundaries and then stop all acts of belligerence ?

 

[Phoenall]

Since there was never a Palestinian state, there is nothing to "occupy". It's captured territory as a result of five Arab nations attacking Israel in 1967 which happens to also be Judeah and Samaria of ancient Israel. Of course non of the wars against Israel were because the Arabs wanted to create this mythical Palestinian state, instead it was always to destroy the Jewish state and divide the proceeds between themselves.

Is Israel Truly an ‘Occupying Power’?
Over at Commentary, Jonathan Tobin is providing excellent coverage of and commentary on the Levy Report, a report by retired Israel Supreme Court justice Edmund Levy finding — among other things — that in the West Bank “Israel does not meet the criteria of ‘military occupation’ as defined under international law.” While the report has been immediately condemned in all the predictable quarters, it’s important to back up and ask an important question: If Israeli governance of the West Bank is truly an “occupation,” then whose territory is being occupied?

Remember, there has never been a recognized Palestinian state in the West Bank. The Palestinians (and surrounding Arab states) rejected the 1947 U.N. Partition Plan for Palestine, which would have created separate Palestinian and Jewish states and chose instead to launch the first of several attempts to destroy Israel and initiate a second Jewish genocide. The 1949 armistice didn’t create a Palestinian state in either the West Bank or Gaza. Egypt took control of Gaza, and Jordan took control of the West Bank. Consequently, when Israel defeated the Arab world’s second major genocide attempt in 1967, it took Gaza and the West Bank not from the Palestinians but from Egypt and Jordan. Israel isn’t occupying Jordanian territory, the Palestinians rejected statehood in 1947 (before the outbreak of war), and while Israel can’t make a clean and exclusive claim to Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), it’s difficult to claim that Israel is “occupying” land that has not since the end of the colonial era definitively belonged to any state. The best phrase to use is “disputed territory.”

I agree with the Jonathan Tobin that the language of “occupation” has done terrible damage not only to the justice of Israel’s claims but also to the hope for peace itself. Occupations under international law must be temporary and thus the Palestinians begin with the default bargaining position of possessing the entirety of the occupied land. Disputed territory, on the other hand, does not yet definitively belong to any power, and its final status is presumed to be settled through negotiation and compromise. The Palestinians begin every negotiation with most of the world community viewing Israel’s occupation as illegal and with the firm conviction that they are entitled by right to 100 percent of Judea and Samaria and that any post-1949 Jewish presence on their land is unlawful. This is not a recipe for compromise, even if Palestinians were predisposed to anything other than the destruction of Israel.

There’s been much talk of “reset buttons” in international affairs. I propose a reset button on the language of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The problem with that Levy Report, is that it is irrelevant to who's territory it is. The "occupation" is defined as "a foreign force occupying a territory it has no clear title to".

So it doesn't matter who's terroritory it is, it only matters that it is not Israel's.

And were does it say that they cant occupy Jordan's land in the west bank ?

 

[Phoenall]

That's the usual cut and paste that Islamics use in futile attempts to bolster their whining about "occupation".

So where is this alleged "occupation" taking place when there is no occupation? You're confused with terms and definitions.

You are one sick piece of shit.

It's been an occupation for the last 50 years and your dumb, skank ass, ain't changing things now.

And were does it say that Israel cant occupy Jordan's land in the west bank. In 1967 the west bank was annexed by Jordan and was never Palestinian.