Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
To be clear, the author is the same.why do I have a dilemma, I don't have any transfer issues. heat leaves the surface out to space. Takes a ride on gases as it leaves. so?so where's energy in that formula. That formula is based off temperature and temperature is heat, and heat does not flow from cold to hot. hmmmm, seems you have a dilemma.
so where's energy in that formula. That formula is based off temperature and temperature is heat, and heat does not flow from cold to hot. hmmmm, seems you have a dilemma
Who claimed heat flows from cold to hot? Where?
We're talking about radiation. Radiation which is moving energy around.
Regardless, we all know that while energy may transfer from a cold body to a warmer one, HEAT cannot, unless some external work is put into the system somehow.
“Greenhouse Effect” is Real, According to Blog
That's from the source you provided yesterday.
It seems you have a dilemma.
To be clear, the link wasn't mine, mine was a different title, the input the same, but, just so the record is correct. Your link.
Plus, I posted the excerpt from the link. So I still don't get where I have a dilemma. I don't claim AGW, I don't claim feedback. I claim natural processes heat and cool the earth as a result of sunlight and the makeup of the planet.
why do I have a dilemma,
Because your source from yesterday admits that energy can travel from a cold body to a warmer one.
The opposite of what you've claimed.
heat leaves the surface out to space.
Obviously.
Takes a ride on gases as it leaves. so?
GHGs slow its exit. And?
To be clear, the link wasn't mine
To be clear, the author is the same.
I claim natural processes heat and cool the earth as a result of sunlight and the makeup of the planet
Yes, the Greenhouse effect is a natural process.
To be clear it wasn't mine. I give two shits the article was the guy. I didn't post it. And please be careful stating I posted it.
The author was right when he agreed with your confusion but wrong when he refutes your confusion? Derp!