traker said-
temperature data doesnt stay the same, although it probably should in most cases. and you never got back to me when I answered your request to show updated data sets that were not being used because the new data did not support the climate alarmist point of view.
you seem to have a very peculiar opinion of how science should be done when it comes to climate studies.
I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you think that all of the climate science is done to appropriate standards and that any criticisms are from anti-scientific crackpots with evil motivations. to help dispell that notion I present a piece of a Muller video lecture. I would even suggest you watch some of his classroom climate lectures also available so that you can assure yourself that he is a warmist and generally a supporter of the IPCC.
Actually the most important element of science, is the data, the measurements, the empiric evidences. The explanations are merely the tools used to categorize, and relate the data. This is why explanations change as understandings grow and are enhanced, but the data always stays the same.
temperature data doesnt stay the same, although it probably should in most cases. and you never got back to me when I answered your request to show updated data sets that were not being used because the new data did not support the climate alarmist point of view.
you seem to have a very peculiar opinion of how science should be done when it comes to climate studies.
I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you think that all of the climate science is done to appropriate standards and that any criticisms are from anti-scientific crackpots with evil motivations. to help dispell that notion I present a piece of a Muller video lecture. I would even suggest you watch some of his classroom climate lectures also available so that you can assure yourself that he is a warmist and generally a supporter of the IPCC.
Last edited by a moderator: