GaryDog
Gold Member
- Feb 10, 2016
- 4,369
- 530
- 195
WRONG.Obviously, the only amendment that matters is the 2nd amendment. What is this 4th amendment you speak of??? /sarcasmBingo. Five years in prison for every illegal weapon regardless of why you came in contact with police would cut down on gun crime more than any other single law.
But no, instead we have things like guy gets caught with a bag of weed and a gun. liberals scream "it's just weed" and the guy gets probation.
Stupid.
Red:
Can you please explain how that policy approach should be executed?
Please be sure to explain how to do so without violating one's 4th Amendment rights as well as addressing how the citizenry and your specified policy approach(s) mitigate or do not introduce "states rights" issues of their own and that merely trade one existing such "issue" for a different one.
- FOURTH AMENDMENT-SEARCH AND SEIZURE
- The Evolution of Search-and-Seizure Law: How New Hampshire and Federal Law Differ
- Freedom from Unreasonable Search and Seizure-A Second Class Constitutional Right?
- The Federal Search and Seizure Exclusionary Rule Its Origin, Development, Present Status and Trend
Blue:
??? Well, if the gun is legally owned, it is "just weed," and it's only that, barring extenuating circumstances, if the "guy" is caught by state law enforcement personnel in a state that hasn't legalized weed sales, use, and/or possession. Now if states pass laws that say one cannot be in proximate possession of weed and guns simultaneously, that's a different matter.
Wrong.....The Bill of Rights needs protection from people like you.....right now the 2nd Amendment is one of the most openly attacked...and just as if not more important than the others...since the others mean nothing if the government chooses to ignore them......
Don't worry.....people like you are also going after the 1st and all the others.......
The 2nd Amendment is meaningless in an era where our government has intercontinental ballistic missiles.....unless you think the ICBMs should be available for public purchase. They are, after all, just inanimate objects, right?
The 2nd Amendment is now purely a relic of the 18th century, used to justify the unrestrained participation in sporting activities.
Yet another typically cogent argument from a gun nut.