Lol. Here’s your chance to show your stuff.You can figure it out from there.And?It has a constant density.How does dark energy increase?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol. Here’s your chance to show your stuff.You can figure it out from there.And?It has a constant density.How does dark energy increase?
Hmm, no,you can figure it out. What happens to stuff when it has a constant density, and you increase the volume of it? Come on ding, this is pre-1989 math. You should be able to do it.Lol. Here’s your chance to show your stuff.You can figure it out from there.And?It has a constant density.How does dark energy increase?
So what’s the First Law of Thermodynamics doing in all of this?Hmm, no,you can figure it out. What happens to stuff when it has a constant density, and you increase the volume of it? Come on ding, this is pre-1989 math. You should be able to do it.Lol. Here’s your chance to show your stuff.You can figure it out from there.And?It has a constant density.How does dark energy increase?
An excellent question! It does appear that the energy of the universe as a whole is not conserved, over time. Freaky.So what’s the First Law of Thermodynamics doing in all of this?Hmm, no,you can figure it out. What happens to stuff when it has a constant density, and you increase the volume of it? Come on ding, this is pre-1989 math. You should be able to do it.Lol. Here’s your chance to show your stuff.You can figure it out from there.And?It has a constant density.
Interesting. Inflation theory which explains the flatness of the universe requires that it does.An excellent question! It does appear that the energy of the universe as a whole is not conserved, over time. Freaky.So what’s the First Law of Thermodynamics doing in all of this?Hmm, no,you can figure it out. What happens to stuff when it has a constant density, and you increase the volume of it? Come on ding, this is pre-1989 math. You should be able to do it.Lol. Here’s your chance to show your stuff.You can figure it out from there.And?
How does the creation of dark energy not violate the first law which says energy cannot be created or destroyed? How does the creation of dark energy not violate the second law by causing entropy to decrease?An excellent question! It does appear that the energy of the universe as a whole is not conserved, over time. Freaky.So what’s the First Law of Thermodynamics doing in all of this?Hmm, no,you can figure it out. What happens to stuff when it has a constant density, and you increase the volume of it? Come on ding, this is pre-1989 math. You should be able to do it.Lol. Here’s your chance to show your stuff.You can figure it out from there.And?
No. It only requires that of the CMB, really.Inflation theory which explains the flatness of the universe requires that it does.
Which, of course, are the same thing, in this case.But to your point, in your previous answer you said dark energy increased so it isn’t that it isn’t conserved it’s that it is being created.
It does. It appears that the law may not, in fact, hold for the system that is our observable universe. Or, alternatively, that our observable universe does not meet the conditions of a system in which the law holds, e.g., a closed system.How does the creation of dark energy not violate the first law which says energy cannot be created or destroyed?
Because "empty", expanding space does not decrease entropy, as far as we know. And because dark energy does not appear to interact with regular energy, or regular matter, or dark matter. It seems only to affect spacetime itself.How does the creation of dark energy not violate the second law by causing entropy to decrease?
So what’s the First Law of Thermodynamics doing in all of this?
An excellent question! It does appear that the energy of the universe as a whole is not conserved, over time. Freaky.
Inflation theory which explains the flatness of the universe requires that it does. Even the final state of thermal equilibrium conserves energy. It’s just that the energy lost as heat for every transaction is no longer useable. But it’s not lost for conservation purposes.
No. It only requires that of the CMB, really.
But to your point, in your previous answer you said dark energy increased so it isn’t that it isn’t conserved it’s that it is being created.
Which, of course, are the same thing, in this case.
That's because it isn't true that the First Law of Thermodynamics has been violated. You keep referring to the loss of energy of the CMB, but that doesn't make any sense at all. Do you have a link for this?I don't know how to explain it. A nobel prize awaits the person who can. Some explanations hypothesized include compensation by loss of energy of the CMB.
How does the creation of dark energy not violate the first law which says energy cannot be created or destroyed?
Do you have a link or a source for this?It does. It appears that the law may not, in fact, hold for the system that is our observable universe. Or, alternatively, that our observable universe does not meet the conditions of a system in which the law holds, e.g., a closed system.
How does the creation of dark energy not violate the second law by causing entropy to decrease?
Do you have a link or source for this?Because "empty", expanding space does not decrease entropy, as far as we know. And because dark energy does not appear to interact with regular energy, or regular matter, or dark matter. It seems only to affect spacetime itself.
100% wrong, as far as using it to determine the geometry of our universe. Doing so relies 100% on the 1st law. Ding, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and shoild shut up immediately. Then, you should go read up on these topics.CMB has nothing to do with the FLoT.
Yes. But you can look it up for yourself.Do you have a link or a source for this?
I see you can’t provide one source I asked you to provide. You are full of shit.100% wrong, as far as using it to determine the geometry of our universe. Doing so relies 100% on the 1st law. Ding, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and shoild shut up immediately. Then, you should go read up on these topics.CMB has nothing to do with the FLoT.
Yes. But you can look it up for yourself.Do you have a link or a source for this?
So are you, mr no link.I see you can’t provide one source I asked you to provide. You are full of shit.100% wrong, as far as using it to determine the geometry of our universe. Doing so relies 100% on the 1st law. Ding, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and shoild shut up immediately. Then, you should go read up on these topics.CMB has nothing to do with the FLoT.
Yes. But you can look it up for yourself.Do you have a link or a source for this?
Which link do you want?So are you, mr no link.I see you can’t provide one source I asked you to provide. You are full of shit.100% wrong, as far as using it to determine the geometry of our universe. Doing so relies 100% on the 1st law. Ding, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and shoild shut up immediately. Then, you should go read up on these topics.CMB has nothing to do with the FLoT.
Yes. But you can look it up for yourself.Do you have a link or a source for this?