Is there anyone who still thinks the government is getting this right?

[Quantum Windbag]

Offer a bounty for murder of Nakoula, the government says you are being inflammatory and inappropriate. Make a really bad movie mocking a religion, the government says you are offensive, disgusting, and reprehensible.

 

[Plasmaball]

Offer a bounty for murder of Nakoula, the government says you are being inflammatory and inappropriate. Make a really bad movie mocking a religion, the government says you are offensive, disgusting, and reprehensible.

wont let this go huh.
someone needed to try fresh with a new thread.

 

[Steelplate]

Rehashing your other thread based on "what if"....Breitbart again?

 

[Steelplate]

You beat me to it...

 

[Rozman]

Well the government was fine with it when the Black Panthers offered a bounty on
the suspect in the Trevon Martin shooting.

But then again it was the Black Panthers...
Seems this government is fine with whatever they do.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Offer a bounty for murder of Nakoula, the government says you are being inflammatory and inappropriate. Make a really bad movie mocking a religion, the government says you are offensive, disgusting, and reprehensible.

wont let this go huh.
someone needed to try fresh with a new thread.

Plasmabot, are you following me around?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Rehashing your other thread based on "what if"....Breitbart again?

Yeah, directly quoting the US government on two separate instances is rehashing Brietbart.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Offer a bounty for murder of Nakoula, the government says you are being inflammatory and inappropriate. Make a really bad movie mocking a religion, the government says you are offensive, disgusting, and reprehensible.

Is your argument that the bounty IS appropriate?

 

[Plasmaball]

Offer a bounty for murder of Nakoula, the government says you are being inflammatory and inappropriate. Make a really bad movie mocking a religion, the government says you are offensive, disgusting, and reprehensible.

wont let this go huh.
someone needed to try fresh with a new thread.

Plasmabot, are you following me around?

Yup...im waiting for you to actually answer my questions.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Offer a bounty for murder of Nakoula, the government says you are being inflammatory and inappropriate. Make a really bad movie mocking a religion, the government says you are offensive, disgusting, and reprehensible.

Is your argument that the bounty IS appropriate?

Yep, that is what I am saying.

Idiot.

Tell me something, why is the US more upset about the video that the bounty?

 

[Annie]

Yep. Why is the administration more concerned with CNN than the fact that Steven's journal, not diary, shows he was concerned about being targeted?

Killing the messenger.

 

[xsited1]

Is there anyone who still thinks the government is getting this right?

Is this a trick question? When has the government ever gotten it right?

 

[Bfgrn]

Offer a bounty for murder of Nakoula, the government says you are being inflammatory and inappropriate. Make a really bad movie mocking a religion, the government says you are offensive, disgusting, and reprehensible.

Who is offering this so called bounty? You really need to provide sources. You REALLY have an honesty problem ass wind. You have been proving it on every thread.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Is there anyone who still thinks the government is getting this right?

Is this a trick question? When has the government ever gotten it right?

Some people think the government is never wrong.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Offer a bounty for murder of Nakoula, the government says you are being inflammatory and inappropriate. Make a really bad movie mocking a religion, the government says you are offensive, disgusting, and reprehensible.

Who is offering this so called bounty? You really need to provide sources. You REALLY have an honesty problem ass wind. You have been proving it on every thread.

What difference does it make who is offering the bounty?

 

[Bfgrn]

Offer a bounty for murder of Nakoula, the government says you are being inflammatory and inappropriate. Make a really bad movie mocking a religion, the government says you are offensive, disgusting, and reprehensible.

Who is offering this so called bounty? You really need to provide sources. You REALLY have an honesty problem ass wind. You have been proving it on every thread.

What difference does it make who is offering the bounty?

This has become your standard answer. http://www.usmessageboard.com/6050860-post210.html

It makes all the difference in the world. The very first is if it is true. Then, if it is a government or an individual. And if it is a government, if it is the US government.

Second. You have an honesty problem. I don't believe a word you say.

 

[xsited1]

Is there anyone who still thinks the government is getting this right?

Is this a trick question? When has the government ever gotten it right?

Some people think the government is never wrong.

True. Clearly a constitutionally sound government is necessary and there are some things they do well, but it's funny to hear the government apologists in the media who preface every statement about the any government agency with "they do great things."

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Who is offering this so called bounty? You really need to provide sources. You REALLY have an honesty problem ass wind. You have been proving it on every thread.

What difference does it make who is offering the bounty?

This has become your standard answer. http://www.usmessageboard.com/6050860-post210.html

It makes all the difference in the world. The very first is if it is true. Then, if it is a government or an individual. And if it is a government, if it is the US government.

Second. You have an honesty problem. I don't believe a word you say.

Who set up the bounty is irrelevant, what I am talking about is how the US government decided to react to the bounty compared to the way it reacted to the video.

As for the rest of your drivel, if it was, hypothetically, the US government, I would have fracking said that, and provided links to shove it down your throat. You can therefore assume, with a large degree of certainty, that it was not the US government.

 

[BlindBoo]

Well the government was fine with it when the Black Panthers offered a bounty on
the suspect in the Trevon Martin shooting.

But then again it was the Black Panthers...
Seems this government is fine with whatever they do.

There Is No New Black Panther Party

Black Panther Party Not Backing Bounty On George Zimmerman | Click here for latest music news (full color articles)

Firstly, the people in the New Black Panthers were never members of the Black Panther Party and have no legitimate claim on the Party’s name.

Secondly, they denigrate the Party’s name by promoting concepts absolutely counter to the revolutionary principles on which the Party was founded.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way...-party-offers-10k-bounty-for-george-zimmerman

the New Black Panther Party has been rejected by the Black Panther Party of the '60s and '70s. The SPLC says the group is "a virulently racist and anti-Semitic organization whose leaders have encouraged violence against whites, Jews and law enforcement officers..."

The Sentinel also reported that the group "called for the mobilization of 10,000 black men to capture Zimmerman."

The paper adds:
"Sanford city officials issued a statement late Saturday, condemning the group's appeal and asking citizens to leave all arrests to the police. The statement was sanctioned by Sanford Police Captain Robert O'Connor — one of two Captains now leading the department in the wake of Police Chief Bill Lee's temporary suspension.

"'The City is requesting calm heads and no vigilante justice,' the statement said. 'Attempts by civilians to take any person into custody may result in criminal charges or unnecessary violence.'"