I ask this because virtually all of the media outlets ignore this question. The so-called experts are quick to say they wouldn't do something that someone else has done, but they never put forth what they would do. And the so-called journalists never press them on this point. This is particularly annoying when they won't defend the status quo, either.
I find this to be intellectually dishonest. Am I holding them to too high a standard, or are their jobs simply to fill up airtime with noise?
I find this to be intellectually dishonest. Am I holding them to too high a standard, or are their jobs simply to fill up airtime with noise?