...
Relevant for India is the so-called third war for the reconquest of southern Tibet projected to take place between 2035-2040. The article states that after taking back Taiwan and the Spratly Islands by 2030, Chinas military power would have increased substantially in army, navy, air force and space warfare. China will then be a power second only to the US and India will, therefore, lose this war.
Describing southern Tibet as the only point of conflict between the two countries, the article observes that India has for long imagined China as an enemy. It takes note of Indias close military and economic ties with the US, Russia and Europe, adding that the attitude of Indian officials and media is more friendly towards these countries and repellent or even hostile to China. It emphasises that though after 20 years India will lag further behind China in military power, it will nevertheless still be one of the few world powers. If, therefore, China uses military force to conquer Southern Tibet then it will have to suffer some losses.
The article recommended that the best strategy and first option for China is to incite Indias disintegration. China should try its best to incite Assam and Sikkim to fight for independence. The second option is to export advanced weapons to Pakistan thus helping it to conquer the southern Kashmir region in 2035 and effect the unification of Kashmir. While India and Pakistan are busy fighting each other in Kashmir, Chinese forces should initiate a blitz attack to conquer southern Tibet. Unable to fight a two-front war, India will lose both. China can then retake Southern Tibet easily, while Pakistan can control the whole of Kashmir. If this plan cannot be adopted, the final and least preferred option is to take direct military action to take back southern Tibet
...
India-China border tussle: the Dragon is dreaming big - Hindustan Times
Relevant for India is the so-called third war for the reconquest of southern Tibet projected to take place between 2035-2040. The article states that after taking back Taiwan and the Spratly Islands by 2030, Chinas military power would have increased substantially in army, navy, air force and space warfare. China will then be a power second only to the US and India will, therefore, lose this war.
Describing southern Tibet as the only point of conflict between the two countries, the article observes that India has for long imagined China as an enemy. It takes note of Indias close military and economic ties with the US, Russia and Europe, adding that the attitude of Indian officials and media is more friendly towards these countries and repellent or even hostile to China. It emphasises that though after 20 years India will lag further behind China in military power, it will nevertheless still be one of the few world powers. If, therefore, China uses military force to conquer Southern Tibet then it will have to suffer some losses.
The article recommended that the best strategy and first option for China is to incite Indias disintegration. China should try its best to incite Assam and Sikkim to fight for independence. The second option is to export advanced weapons to Pakistan thus helping it to conquer the southern Kashmir region in 2035 and effect the unification of Kashmir. While India and Pakistan are busy fighting each other in Kashmir, Chinese forces should initiate a blitz attack to conquer southern Tibet. Unable to fight a two-front war, India will lose both. China can then retake Southern Tibet easily, while Pakistan can control the whole of Kashmir. If this plan cannot be adopted, the final and least preferred option is to take direct military action to take back southern Tibet
...
India-China border tussle: the Dragon is dreaming big - Hindustan Times
