Iranian Home-Coming?

[g5000]

A Flock Of Seagulls Iran download Mp3 Listen Free Online

 

[PoliticalChic]

Most who remain au fait in the political realm are aware of the immense political influence ....


1. "....holds the position of Senior Advisor to the President of the United States. President Obama has said he consults Jarrett on every major decision, and the New Republic's Noam Scheiber reported thus of her influence with the White House:

"Her role since she has been at the White House is one of the broadest and most expansive roles that I think has ever existed in the West Wing," says Anita Dunn, Obama's former communications director. Broader, even, than the role of running the West Wing. This summer, the call to send Attorney General Eric Holder on a risky visit to Ferguson, Missouri, was made by exactly three people: Holder himself, the president, and Jarrett, who were vacationing together on Martha's Vineyard. When I asked Holder if Denis McDonough, the chief of staff, was part of the conversation, he thought for a moment and said, "He was not there."
/snopes.com Valerie Jarrett on Islam


2. And, and this fact, also well known"
"Valerie Jarrett was born as Valerie Bowman on November 14, 1956 to American parents in Shiraz, Iran."
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2418



3. But here is a fact hardly known:
"When Dr. Vanessa Bradford Kerry and Dr. Brian Vala Nahed were making plans to marry, she received a sketch of a wedding dress done by her father.

Dr. Kerry’s father, John Kerry, has been a senator from Massachusetts since 1984. He is the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.[This was published in 2009] .... — Senator Kerry has enthusiastically served on his daughter’s wedding committee, helping to fill not just his own role, but the one the bride’s mother surely would have played.

...the bridegroom, a son of Nooshin P. Nahed and Dr. Reza M. Nahed of Los Angeles, were married Saturday evening."
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/11/fashion/weddings/11KERRY.html?_r=0


4. "Behrouz (Brian) Vala Nahed is a son of Nooshin P. Nahed and Dr. Reza M. Nahed of Los Angeles.

Kerry’s critics have expressed their concerns over his Iran feelings- visiting Iran and his opposition to military strike and pressures on Iran- that may be related to his relation with an Iranian family, wielding impact on Kerry’s positions on Iran."
Who is Iranian son-in-law of US Secretary of State


a. "Brian's Persian birth name is "Behrooz Vala Nahid" but it is now shortenedand Americanized in the media to "Brian Nahed." There is rarely any mention of Nahed's Persian/Iranian ancestry, and even the official wedding announcement in the October 2009 issue of New York Times carefully avoids any reference to Dr. Nahed (Nahid)'s birthplace (which is uncommon in wedding announcements) and starts his biography from his college years..."
How did Kerry s Iranian son-in-law met Vanessa Kerry - kodoom.com - Kodoom



And, in a related story:

5. "Kerry Denies Seeing Iran Deal's Side Agreements
Secretary of State John Kerry insisted Tuesday the Obama administration has not seen the contents oftwo side agreements to the Iran nuclear deal reached between that country and the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Kerry was pressed on the issue in a hearing before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, where multiple members brought up what some lawmakers have dubbed "secret" side deals to the nuclear accord reached earlier this month between six world powers and Iran. Congress is in the midst of a 60-day period in which it can review the deal, and the role of the IAEA has emerged as a principal point of contention for the pact's opponents."
Kerry Denies Seeing Iran Nuclear Deal s Side Agreements - US News

"The bridegroom graduated magna cum laude from the University of California, Los Angeles, and received his medical degree cum laude from Yale. His father, a pulmonologist and sleep medicine and critical-care physician, is the chief of staff at Holy Cross Hospital in Mission Hills, Calif. He also runs a private practice there, which is managed by the bridegroom’s mother." You are just resentful of your betters. Did you graduate magna cum laude from UCLA? From Yale medical school?

Is your point that his being educated means he could not be a sympathizer of the terrorist regime in Tehran?

Think carefully before you respond.

You offered not a single fucking bit of evidence that suggested that a young doctor whose parents were born in Iran or an American who was born there only because her American born parents happened to be working there sympathize with the Iranian government. Most Iranians, here and living in Iran, want nothing more than to live peaceful lives and most do not share the views of their government. The Iranian people are not our enemy and do not support terrorism. The surest way to strengthen the hold their government has and to make any reforms there impossible is to reject this agreement and to continue to ostracize Iran. When the world condemned South Africa and called for disinvestment from that terrorist nation Republicans claimed that our investment constituted constructive engagement that would do more to bring about change. They were right. That should be our policy now.

You appear to be having trouble responding to this post:

Is your point that his being educated means he could not be a sympathizer of the terrorist regime in Tehran?

Think carefully before you respond.

You have trouble responding to this post. What evidence do you have that John Kerry's son--in-law sympathizes with the Iranian government?

OK...let's agree that you have run away from your earlier post, the one that attempts to disqualify the OP based on the educational background the boy in question.

Wise move.

 

[paddymurphy]

Another ridiculous lie from the OP, another failed thread.

You've neglected to find said 'lie".....again.

1. they also like pistachios, which can be found in rafsanjan, iran. rafsanjani is a mullah and former prez of iran. he is, as everyone knows, evil.


a.they also like roses, which can be found in shiraz. which is in iran. everyone knows iran is evil.


2. they also want to go to paradise, which as everyone knows is a persian word. persian is evil and sounds a little bit like pershing, which is a rocket, which is evil, and can be used to bomb topeka, kansas, which is good. topeka, not bombing of topeka.


3. they all like amino acids, they even harbour them in their bodies. everyone knows that "amino acid" comprises the persian name amin, which is evil.

q.e.d.

^ that PoliticalSpice.

Geez. Do you ever quit w/ your zany rw hack threads? (That was a rhetorical question. )

Why is so essential to you that opposing voices be silenced?

Pointing our your stupidity is not silencing you.

You appear to be having trouble responding to this post:

Is your point that his being educated means he could not be a sympathizer of the terrorist regime in Tehran?

Think carefully before you respond.

Is it the "Think carefully" part that has you stymied?

So, you cannot provide any evidence? Thought as much. So who is next to be accused or sympathy with terrorists? I heard that Hillary Clinton has Persian Rugs in her home. That enough to make her a sympathizer in your tiny, barely functioning brain?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Via the Daily Caller:

In a greeting to the Iranian people on the occasion of the traditional New Year (Nowruz) holiday last week, Secretary of State John Kerry exposed a secret that journalists and academics have been agonizing over for the past six weeks: the fact that his daughter has married an Iranian-American who has extensive family ties to Iran.

Since its inception, the FBI has vetted U.S. government officials involved in national security issues, and it generally won’t grant clearances to individuals who are married to nationals of an enemy nation or have family members living in that country, for fear of divided loyalties or, more simply, blackmail.

There it is. Certainly, even leftists can comprehend this concept without inserting race into their thought processes (oh, wait). Imagine a scenario in which a representative of Iran’s mullahs approaches the State Department with a list of demands that, if not met, could have serious consequences for Kerry’s in-laws living in Iran.

Kerry exposes Iranian family tie and subjects family to blackmail The Daily Caller

 

[paddymurphy]

Via the Daily Caller:

In a greeting to the Iranian people on the occasion of the traditional New Year (Nowruz) holiday last week, Secretary of State John Kerry exposed a secret that journalists and academics have been agonizing over for the past six weeks: the fact that his daughter has married an Iranian-American who has extensive family ties to Iran.

Since its inception, the FBI has vetted U.S. government officials involved in national security issues, and it generally won’t grant clearances to individuals who are married to nationals of an enemy nation or have family members living in that country, for fear of divided loyalties or, more simply, blackmail.

There it is. Certainly, even leftists can comprehend this concept without inserting race into their thought processes (oh, wait). Imagine a scenario in which a representative of Iran’s mullahs approaches the State Department with a list of demands that, if not met, could have serious consequences for Kerry’s in-laws living in Iran.

Kerry exposes Iranian family tie and subjects family to blackmail The Daily Caller

I asked for evidence. An opinion from a right wing asshole is not evidence. By your logic, both Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio should be ineligible for office because they still have family in Cuba. And Kerry does not have in-laws in Iran. His in law is his daughter's husband and they live here. His parents live here.

But, on the positive side you seem to have finally been able to at least attempt to respond to my post. You failed, but you get an A for effort.

 

[Unkotare]

Interesting how threatened the liberal UNtelligensia is by the mere consideration (not accusation) of any potential conflict of interest. Potential recruits to various governmental positions requiring security clearance are asked if they are married to foreign nationals and/or have extended family overseas. Those who do are vetted rather more carefully. Is such diligence 'unfair' or some such juvenile nonsense?

 

[paddymurphy]

Interesting how threatened the liberal UNtelligensia is by the mere consideration (not accusation) of any potential conflict of interest. Potential recruits to various governmental positions requiring security clearance are asked if they are married to foreign nationals and/or have extended family overseas. Those who do are vetted rather more carefully. Is such diligence 'unfair' or some such juvenile nonsense?

Not unfair. And clearly already happened here with Kerry. As for Jarret, what part of she and her parents have no family tie to Iran are you to stupid to understand? She was born there because her parents worked there; kind of like Cruz was born in Canada because his parents worked there or McCain was born in Panama because his father was stationed there.

 

[NYcarbineer]

PC's ideology of extremism is much closer to Iran even than the Jarrets or Kerrys. Extremism is not religion but rather ideology. She shares a dialectic of hatred and opposition with the Iranian hard core anti-Americanism.

are all Koreans like that or just her???

Not at all, imo. She is a representative of a reactionary form of Presbyterianism rooted in 17the century Puritanism amalgamated with hard right American capitalism and bigotry. The Koreans I met overseas, both Christian and non-, were reasonable folks. The major difference existed on the need of a significant presence of American armed force in-country. They are capitalists to the bone, love baseball: even the very few socialists and communists there love baseball.

She says she was adopted

I think maybe 'retrofitted' would be a more apt term.

 

[Unkotare]

Via the Daily Caller:

In a greeting to the Iranian people on the occasion of the traditional New Year (Nowruz) holiday last week, Secretary of State John Kerry exposed a secret that journalists and academics have been agonizing over for the past six weeks: the fact that his daughter has married an Iranian-American who has extensive family ties to Iran.

Since its inception, the FBI has vetted U.S. government officials involved in national security issues, and it generally won’t grant clearances to individuals who are married to nationals of an enemy nation or have family members living in that country, for fear of divided loyalties or, more simply, blackmail.

There it is. Certainly, even leftists can comprehend this concept without inserting race into their thought processes (oh, wait). Imagine a scenario in which a representative of Iran’s mullahs approaches the State Department with a list of demands that, if not met, could have serious consequences for Kerry’s in-laws living in Iran.

Kerry exposes Iranian family tie and subjects family to blackmail The Daily Caller

maybe [sic] the ones that adopted you can get their money back , they got the short end of the deal, A shame since most Koreans I have dealt with are very intelligent studios [sic] people , seems like you are the exception [sic]

You need to stop attacking family, and to learn the English language, racist troll.

 

[NYcarbineer]

This is why PC hates the Persians:

Interesting.

So....what is the reason you hate Americans?

Because I pretty much hate everyone.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Via the Daily Caller:

In a greeting to the Iranian people on the occasion of the traditional New Year (Nowruz) holiday last week, Secretary of State John Kerry exposed a secret that journalists and academics have been agonizing over for the past six weeks: the fact that his daughter has married an Iranian-American who has extensive family ties to Iran.

Since its inception, the FBI has vetted U.S. government officials involved in national security issues, and it generally won’t grant clearances to individuals who are married to nationals of an enemy nation or have family members living in that country, for fear of divided loyalties or, more simply, blackmail.

There it is. Certainly, even leftists can comprehend this concept without inserting race into their thought processes (oh, wait). Imagine a scenario in which a representative of Iran’s mullahs approaches the State Department with a list of demands that, if not met, could have serious consequences for Kerry’s in-laws living in Iran.

Kerry exposes Iranian family tie and subjects family to blackmail The Daily Caller

I asked for evidence. An opinion from a right wing asshole is not evidence. By your logic, both Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio should be ineligible for office because they still have family in Cuba. And Kerry does not have in-laws in Iran. His in law is his daughter's husband and they live here. His parents live here.

1. I gave the following "evidence" of potential problem: Obama's senior adviser was born in Iran....Kerry, who hasn't even read the 'agreement' to give the Iranians a nuclear weapon, has family living under the mullahs....

...mullahs....who attempted to have an assassination in America....

....yet you fail to see a problem.

Note: none of you drones has cast any doubt on the facts in the OP>

2. You tried to find a way to absolve the son-in-law before any charges were even leveled....but when I forced you to reconsider your post, you ran and have not mentioned his educational background again.
Clearly, your post was foolish.

3. The,from post #44,proves the validity of my OP. Again:
"... the FBI has vetted U.S. government officials involved in national security issues, and it generally won’t grant clearances to individuals who are married to nationals of an enemy nation or have family members living in that country, for fear of divided loyalties or, more simply, blackmail."

Now, try not to be a dunce.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nor are these the only potential problems in this untoward administration....

"Secretary Of State John Kerry Demonstrates Why Huma Abedin’s Background Mattered

When folks like Andrew McCarthy articulated why our findings about then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s close adviser Huma Abedin were important, his camp was smeared as being discriminatory. His argument had nothing to do with discrimination or Islamophobia. It had everything to do with Abedin’s familial ties compromising her judgment and allegiances to the U.S. Constitution.

....those of us who understand the threat of the Muslim Brotherhood, shouldn’t our Secretary of State’s sole interest be in lockstep with the interests of the United States?

Last year, Abedin’s familial ties to the Brotherhood prompted calls to see her Form 86,which she would have had to fill out in order to gain a security clearance. If she did not, we have a problem. Similarly, if Kerry did not, we also have a problem.

Who would have thought that two consecutive Secretaries of State would have to deal with such controversy?"
Secretary of State John Kerry demonstrates why Huma Abedin s background mattered - Walid Shoebat






Oh, see....the Lock-Step Liberals have tried and failed.....now they've left to ply their lies elsewhere.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Via the Daily Caller:

In a greeting to the Iranian people on the occasion of the traditional New Year (Nowruz) holiday last week, Secretary of State John Kerry exposed a secret that journalists and academics have been agonizing over for the past six weeks: the fact that his daughter has married an Iranian-American who has extensive family ties to Iran.

Since its inception, the FBI has vetted U.S. government officials involved in national security issues, and it generally won’t grant clearances to individuals who are married to nationals of an enemy nation or have family members living in that country, for fear of divided loyalties or, more simply, blackmail.

There it is. Certainly, even leftists can comprehend this concept without inserting race into their thought processes (oh, wait). Imagine a scenario in which a representative of Iran’s mullahs approaches the State Department with a list of demands that, if not met, could have serious consequences for Kerry’s in-laws living in Iran.

Kerry exposes Iranian family tie and subjects family to blackmail The Daily Caller

maybe [sic] the ones that adopted you can get their money back , they got the short end of the deal, A shame since most Koreans I have dealt with are very intelligent studios [sic] people , seems like you are the exception [sic]

You need to stop attacking family, and to learn the English language, racist troll.

guno is not attacking family or heritage, kid.

 

[JakeStarkey]

PC gave no objective evidence of what she now calls "potential problems."

 

[paddymurphy]

Via the Daily Caller:

In a greeting to the Iranian people on the occasion of the traditional New Year (Nowruz) holiday last week, Secretary of State John Kerry exposed a secret that journalists and academics have been agonizing over for the past six weeks: the fact that his daughter has married an Iranian-American who has extensive family ties to Iran.

Since its inception, the FBI has vetted U.S. government officials involved in national security issues, and it generally won’t grant clearances to individuals who are married to nationals of an enemy nation or have family members living in that country, for fear of divided loyalties or, more simply, blackmail.

There it is. Certainly, even leftists can comprehend this concept without inserting race into their thought processes (oh, wait). Imagine a scenario in which a representative of Iran’s mullahs approaches the State Department with a list of demands that, if not met, could have serious consequences for Kerry’s in-laws living in Iran.

Kerry exposes Iranian family tie and subjects family to blackmail The Daily Caller

I asked for evidence. An opinion from a right wing asshole is not evidence. By your logic, both Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio should be ineligible for office because they still have family in Cuba. And Kerry does not have in-laws in Iran. His in law is his daughter's husband and they live here. His parents live here.

1. I gave the following "evidence" of potential problem: Obama's senior adviser was boren in Iran....Kerry, who hasn't even read the 'agreement' to give the Iranians a nuclear weapon, has family living under the mullahs....

...mullahs....who attempted to have an assassination in America....

....yet you fail to see a problem.

Note: none of you drones has cast any doubt on the facts in the OP>

2. You tried to find a way to absolve the son-in-law before any charges were even leveled....but when I forced you to reconsider your post, you ran and have not mentioned his educational background again.
Clearly, your post was foolish.

3. The,from post #44,proves the validity of my OP. Again:
"... the FBI has vetted U.S. government officials involved in national security issues, and it generally won’t grant clearances to individuals who are married to nationals of an enemy nation or have family members living in that country, for fear of divided loyalties or, more simply, blackmail."

Now, try not to be a dunce.

How does the fact that an American was born in Iran to American Parents working there and who lived there all of five years after her birth, all during the Shah's reign, create evidence of a potential problem?

Kerry has read the agreement.

Would you bar anyone from government service who had distant relatives by marriage living an a nation we have poor relations with?

Your FBI reference does not apply. Kerry has no family members living in Iran, his daughter's husband does.

You think that the mullahs would think that grabbing up Kerry's son-in law's third cousin Reza would influence our policy?

 

[JakeStarkey]

PC is unqualified, by her reasoning, by birth of serving the USA.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Via the Daily Caller:

In a greeting to the Iranian people on the occasion of the traditional New Year (Nowruz) holiday last week, Secretary of State John Kerry exposed a secret that journalists and academics have been agonizing over for the past six weeks: the fact that his daughter has married an Iranian-American who has extensive family ties to Iran.

Since its inception, the FBI has vetted U.S. government officials involved in national security issues, and it generally won’t grant clearances to individuals who are married to nationals of an enemy nation or have family members living in that country, for fear of divided loyalties or, more simply, blackmail.

There it is. Certainly, even leftists can comprehend this concept without inserting race into their thought processes (oh, wait). Imagine a scenario in which a representative of Iran’s mullahs approaches the State Department with a list of demands that, if not met, could have serious consequences for Kerry’s in-laws living in Iran.

Kerry exposes Iranian family tie and subjects family to blackmail The Daily Caller

I asked for evidence. An opinion from a right wing asshole is not evidence. By your logic, both Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio should be ineligible for office because they still have family in Cuba. And Kerry does not have in-laws in Iran. His in law is his daughter's husband and they live here. His parents live here.

1. I gave the following "evidence" of potential problem: Obama's senior adviser was boren in Iran....Kerry, who hasn't even read the 'agreement' to give the Iranians a nuclear weapon, has family living under the mullahs....

...mullahs....who attempted to have an assassination in America....

....yet you fail to see a problem.

Note: none of you drones has cast any doubt on the facts in the OP>

2. You tried to find a way to absolve the son-in-law before any charges were even leveled....but when I forced you to reconsider your post, you ran and have not mentioned his educational background again.
Clearly, your post was foolish.

3. The,from post #44,proves the validity of my OP. Again:
"... the FBI has vetted U.S. government officials involved in national security issues, and it generally won’t grant clearances to individuals who are married to nationals of an enemy nation or have family members living in that country, for fear of divided loyalties or, more simply, blackmail."

Now, try not to be a dunce.

How does the fact that an American was born in Iran to American Parents working there and who lived there all of five years after her birth, all during the Shah's reign, create evidence of a potential problem?

Kerry has read the agreement.

Would you bar anyone from government service who had distant relatives by marriage living an a nation we have poor relations with?

Your FBI reference does not apply. Kerry has no family members living in Iran, his daughter's husband does.

You think that the mullahs would think that grabbing up Kerry's son-in law's third cousin Reza would influence our policy?

Possibly you are unfamiliar with the etymology of the phrase "son-in-law."

I can understand that....you seem unfamiliar with so very many things.

 

[Dot Com]

1. they also like pistachios, which can be found in rafsanjan, iran. rafsanjani is a mullah and former prez of iran. he is, as everyone knows, evil.


a.they also like roses, which can be found in shiraz. which is in iran. everyone knows iran is evil.


2. they also want to go to paradise, which as everyone knows is a persian word. persian is evil and sounds a little bit like pershing, which is a rocket, which is evil, and can be used to bomb topeka, kansas, which is good. topeka, not bombing of topeka.


3. they all like amino acids, they even harbour them in their bodies. everyone knows that "amino acid" comprises the persian name amin, which is evil.

q.e.d.

^ that PoliticalSpice.

Geez. Do you ever quit w/ your zany rw hack threads? (That was a rhetorical question. )

Why is so essential to you that opposing voices be silenced?

I'm trying to help you to stop embarrassing yourself

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. they also like pistachios, which can be found in rafsanjan, iran. rafsanjani is a mullah and former prez of iran. he is, as everyone knows, evil.


a.they also like roses, which can be found in shiraz. which is in iran. everyone knows iran is evil.


2. they also want to go to paradise, which as everyone knows is a persian word. persian is evil and sounds a little bit like pershing, which is a rocket, which is evil, and can be used to bomb topeka, kansas, which is good. topeka, not bombing of topeka.


3. they all like amino acids, they even harbour them in their bodies. everyone knows that "amino acid" comprises the persian name amin, which is evil.

q.e.d.

^ that PoliticalSpice.

Geez. Do you ever quit w/ your zany rw hack threads? (That was a rhetorical question. )

Why is so essential to you that opposing voices be silenced?

I'm trying to help you to stop embarrassing yourself

I just whipped all of you Lock-Step Liberals......

....sure seems more like I embarrassed you dopes.


True?

 

[NYcarbineer]

All Iranians think alike now?

lol, ferreting out Iranians for blanket condemnation is quite a bit like the Nazis ferreting out Jews,

wouldn't you say, Mr. Huckabee?

I must admit that Huckabee certainly went up in my estimation this week.

That's because you're as retarded as he is.