Iran Fines U.S. Administration $50 Billion

[Jackson]

Obama should tell them to kiss his ass.

That's the answer, but he wants a treaty regardless of what the demands are.

Every Prez wants his "legacy."

Even when it could seriously work against our best interests?

why do you assume that a deal that prevents iran from making nuclear weapons would be against our interests?

So you think that deal is going to prevent them from getting the bomb? I don't. Let's read the fine print and see what happens with "our new friend."

 

[ogibillm]

Obama should tell them to kiss his ass.

That's the answer, but he wants a treaty regardless of what the demands are.

Every Prez wants his "legacy."

Even when it could seriously work against our best interests?

why do you assume that a deal that prevents iran from making nuclear weapons would be against our interests?

So you think that deal is going to prevent them from getting the bomb? I don't. Let's read the fine print and see what happens with "our new friend."

fine. but it seems like you've made up your mind already.

 

[Jackson]

That's the answer, but he wants a treaty regardless of what the demands are.

Every Prez wants his "legacy."

Even when it could seriously work against our best interests?

why do you assume that a deal that prevents iran from making nuclear weapons would be against our interests?

So you think that deal is going to prevent them from getting the bomb? I don't. Let's read the fine print and see what happens with "our new friend."

fine. but it seems like you've made up your mind already.

Well, from the standpoint of negotiating, the first order of business should have been getting our hostages back. Then making it clear that IEA? would be monitoring and inspecting their country for cheating. They have said time and time again they won't have inspectors. What do you make of that?

 

[ogibillm]

Every Prez wants his "legacy."

Even when it could seriously work against our best interests?

why do you assume that a deal that prevents iran from making nuclear weapons would be against our interests?

So you think that deal is going to prevent them from getting the bomb? I don't. Let's read the fine print and see what happens with "our new friend."

fine. but it seems like you've made up your mind already.

Well, from the standpoint of negotiating, the first order of business should have been getting our hostages back. Then making it clear that IEA? would be monitoring and inspecting their country for cheating. They have said time and time again they won't have inspectors. What do you make of that?

we've said the opposite, and iran needs the deal more than we do.

 

[Jackson]

Even when it could seriously work against our best interests?

why do you assume that a deal that prevents iran from making nuclear weapons would be against our interests?

So you think that deal is going to prevent them from getting the bomb? I don't. Let's read the fine print and see what happens with "our new friend."

fine. but it seems like you've made up your mind already.

Well, from the standpoint of negotiating, the first order of business should have been getting our hostages back. Then making it clear that IEA? would be monitoring and inspecting their country for cheating. They have said time and time again they won't have inspectors. What do you make of that?

we've said the opposite, and iran needs the deal more than we do.

And their leaders continue to say, "Death to America."

 

[DarkFury]

Obama should tell them to kiss his ass.

Obama IS their ass.

 

[ogibillm]

why do you assume that a deal that prevents iran from making nuclear weapons would be against our interests?

So you think that deal is going to prevent them from getting the bomb? I don't. Let's read the fine print and see what happens with "our new friend."

fine. but it seems like you've made up your mind already.

Well, from the standpoint of negotiating, the first order of business should have been getting our hostages back. Then making it clear that IEA? would be monitoring and inspecting their country for cheating. They have said time and time again they won't have inspectors. What do you make of that?

we've said the opposite, and iran needs the deal more than we do.

And their leaders continue to say, "Death to America."

so? they can say what they want, this isn't a marriage proposal and we aren't inviting them to our birthday party.

 

[Jackson]

So you think that deal is going to prevent them from getting the bomb? I don't. Let's read the fine print and see what happens with "our new friend."

fine. but it seems like you've made up your mind already.

Well, from the standpoint of negotiating, the first order of business should have been getting our hostages back. Then making it clear that IEA? would be monitoring and inspecting their country for cheating. They have said time and time again they won't have inspectors. What do you make of that?

we've said the opposite, and iran needs the deal more than we do.

And their leaders continue to say, "Death to America."

so? they can say what they want, this isn't a marriage proposal and we aren't inviting them to our birthday party.

There has to be a level of trust in dealing with a partner in treaties. They have said and done nothing to instill any trust.

 

[ogibillm]

fine. but it seems like you've made up your mind already.

Well, from the standpoint of negotiating, the first order of business should have been getting our hostages back. Then making it clear that IEA? would be monitoring and inspecting their country for cheating. They have said time and time again they won't have inspectors. What do you make of that?

we've said the opposite, and iran needs the deal more than we do.

And their leaders continue to say, "Death to America."

so? they can say what they want, this isn't a marriage proposal and we aren't inviting them to our birthday party.

There has to be a level of trust in dealing with a partner in treaties. They have said and done nothing to instill any trust.

so you need them to be our friend and say nice things about the united states before you'll make a deal that requires inspections to verify they are holding up their end of the bargain?

 

[Jackson]

Well, from the standpoint of negotiating, the first order of business should have been getting our hostages back. Then making it clear that IEA? would be monitoring and inspecting their country for cheating. They have said time and time again they won't have inspectors. What do you make of that?

we've said the opposite, and iran needs the deal more than we do.

And their leaders continue to say, "Death to America."

so? they can say what they want, this isn't a marriage proposal and we aren't inviting them to our birthday party.

There has to be a level of trust in dealing with a partner in treaties. They have said and done nothing to instill any trust.

so you need them to be our friend and say nice things about the united states before you'll make a deal that requires inspections to verify they are holding up their end of the bargain?

Well, they don't have to say nice things, maybe not the hateful destructive things. This is where we need Trump.

 

[Jackson]

So you think that deal is going to prevent them from getting the bomb? I don't. Let's read the fine print and see what happens with "our new friend."

fine. but it seems like you've made up your mind already.

Well, from the standpoint of negotiating, the first order of business should have been getting our hostages back. Then making it clear that IEA? would be monitoring and inspecting their country for cheating. They have said time and time again they won't have inspectors. What do you make of that?

we've said the opposite, and iran needs the deal more than we do.

And their leaders continue to say, "Death to America."

so? they can say what they want, this isn't a marriage proposal and we aren't inviting them to our birthday party.

And saying they won't let inspectors in to verify is more important that a birthday party. Don't you think?

 

[ogibillm]

we've said the opposite, and iran needs the deal more than we do.

And their leaders continue to say, "Death to America."

so? they can say what they want, this isn't a marriage proposal and we aren't inviting them to our birthday party.

There has to be a level of trust in dealing with a partner in treaties. They have said and done nothing to instill any trust.

so you need them to be our friend and say nice things about the united states before you'll make a deal that requires inspections to verify they are holding up their end of the bargain?

Well, they don't have to say nice things, maybe not the hateful destructive things. This is where we need Trump.

this is where you lose all credibility. trump has shown with his 'make mexico build and pay for a wall' crap that he has no idea how to handle international relations

 

[DarkFury]

And their leaders continue to say, "Death to America."

so? they can say what they want, this isn't a marriage proposal and we aren't inviting them to our birthday party.

There has to be a level of trust in dealing with a partner in treaties. They have said and done nothing to instill any trust.

so you need them to be our friend and say nice things about the united states before you'll make a deal that requires inspections to verify they are holding up their end of the bargain?

Well, they don't have to say nice things, maybe not the hateful destructive things. This is where we need Trump.

this is where you lose all credibility. trump has shown with his 'make mexico build and pay for a wall' crap that he has no idea how to handle international relations

Yeah, he's been doing it for four plus DECADES and Obama?
How much time did he do it BEFORE being elected?
Oh yeah, NONE.

 

[ogibillm]

so? they can say what they want, this isn't a marriage proposal and we aren't inviting them to our birthday party.

There has to be a level of trust in dealing with a partner in treaties. They have said and done nothing to instill any trust.

so you need them to be our friend and say nice things about the united states before you'll make a deal that requires inspections to verify they are holding up their end of the bargain?

Well, they don't have to say nice things, maybe not the hateful destructive things. This is where we need Trump.

this is where you lose all credibility. trump has shown with his 'make mexico build and pay for a wall' crap that he has no idea how to handle international relations

Yeah, he's been doing it for four plus DECADES and Obama?
How much time did he do it BEFORE being elected?
Oh yeah, NONE.

in what world had trump been handling international relations for four decades? that's just insane.

 

[SwimExpert]

Well, they don't have to say nice things, maybe not the hateful destructive things. This is where we need Trump.

Trump is the only person in America to support this "one country can fine another country" theory. That makes Trump the only candidate who just might endorse the US paying this fine. That's what you want?

 

[longknife]

There has to be a level of trust in dealing with a partner in treaties. They have said and done nothing to instill any trust.

so you need them to be our friend and say nice things about the united states before you'll make a deal that requires inspections to verify they are holding up their end of the bargain?

Well, they don't have to say nice things, maybe not the hateful destructive things. This is where we need Trump.

this is where you lose all credibility. trump has shown with his 'make mexico build and pay for a wall' crap that he has no idea how to handle international relations

Yeah, he's been doing it for four plus DECADES and Obama?
How much time did he do it BEFORE being elected?
Oh yeah, NONE.

in what world had trump been handling international relations for four decades? that's just insane.

Trump has been dealing with foreign governments for decades as part of his building an INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS!

 

[longknife]

It's gonna be interesting to see of Obozo caves in to this too and comes up with the moolah.

 

[Jackson]

so you need them to be our friend and say nice things about the united states before you'll make a deal that requires inspections to verify they are holding up their end of the bargain?

Well, they don't have to say nice things, maybe not the hateful destructive things. This is where we need Trump.

this is where you lose all credibility. trump has shown with his 'make mexico build and pay for a wall' crap that he has no idea how to handle international relations

Yeah, he's been doing it for four plus DECADES and Obama?
How much time did he do it BEFORE being elected?
Oh yeah, NONE.

in what world had trump been handling international relations for four decades? that's just insane.

Trump has been dealing with foreign governments for decades as part of his building an INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS!

successfuly, I might add.

 

[ogibillm]

so you need them to be our friend and say nice things about the united states before you'll make a deal that requires inspections to verify they are holding up their end of the bargain?

Well, they don't have to say nice things, maybe not the hateful destructive things. This is where we need Trump.

this is where you lose all credibility. trump has shown with his 'make mexico build and pay for a wall' crap that he has no idea how to handle international relations

Yeah, he's been doing it for four plus DECADES and Obama?
How much time did he do it BEFORE being elected?
Oh yeah, NONE.

in what world had trump been handling international relations for four decades? that's just insane.

Trump has been dealing with foreign governments for decades as part of his building an INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS!

operating within the confines of the relationships actual diplomats have formed.

 

[Jackson]

It's gonna be interesting to see of Obozo caves in to this too and comes up with the moolah.

Just a guess, but if we all look in the mirror,we might see where he's going to get the money. And that is after people pay the penalty tax on Obamacare.