Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Sadly for you, it is the truth.Iran has changed its behavior. It has deconstructed its nuclear weapons program. It has removed the very reasons the sanctions against the nuclear weapons program were put in place, and so there is no reason for them any longer.
They have met the terms of the agreement, despite claims by the loons they never would.
The only ones who deny it are people like you who have never read a word of the agreement and get all their information from propaganda outlets.
Did North Korea ship uranium out? Did North Korea pour concrete into a reactor? Did North Korea shut down their centrifuges and destroy their weapons labs?Sadly for you, it is the truth.Iran has changed its behavior. It has deconstructed its nuclear weapons program. It has removed the very reasons the sanctions against the nuclear weapons program were put in place, and so there is no reason for them any longer.
They have met the terms of the agreement, despite claims by the loons they never would.
The only ones who deny it are people like you who have never read a word of the agreement and get all their information from propaganda outlets.
Just like North Korea? How gullible are you, Neville?
Did North Korea ship uranium out? Did North Korea pour concrete into a reactor? Did North Korea shut down their centrifuges and destroy their weapons labs?Sadly for you, it is the truth.Iran has changed its behavior. It has deconstructed its nuclear weapons program. It has removed the very reasons the sanctions against the nuclear weapons program were put in place, and so there is no reason for them any longer.
They have met the terms of the agreement, despite claims by the loons they never would.
The only ones who deny it are people like you who have never read a word of the agreement and get all their information from propaganda outlets.
Just like North Korea? How gullible are you, Neville?
Nope.
Apples and oranges, rube.
The whole point of sanctions is to get a rogue nation to change its behavior.
If you don't remove the sanctions once that behavior is changed, then sanctions are pointless.
Iran has changed its behavior. It has deconstructed its nuclear weapons program. It has removed the very reasons the sanctions against the nuclear weapons program were put in place, and so there is no reason for them any longer.
It must really upset the loons their "Obama gave Iran nukes" narrative has been proven to be utterly false. Despite it being false, they still want the sanctions! WTF is that?!?
I think the obligatory Chamberlain reference you dispell any remaining faith you may have harbored that there actually was a cogent argument to be made against the treaty and events which followed....
The treaty shouldn't be seen in isolation, but rather as part of a process informed by a reasonable conclusion that the constructive participation of Iran is essential in the resulotion of the principal pathologies affecting the region. Relying on "allies" like Saudi Arabia has yielded nothing of value, and has obliged a tolerance of their indisputable indulgence of Islamic extremism.
The whole point of sanctions is to get a rogue nation to change its behavior.
If you don't remove the sanctions once that behavior is changed, then sanctions are pointless.
Iran has changed its behavior. It has deconstructed its nuclear weapons program. It has removed the very reasons the sanctions against the nuclear weapons program were put in place, and so there is no reason for them any longer.
It must really upset the loons their "Obama gave Iran nukes" narrative has been proven to be utterly false. Despite it being false, they still want the sanctions! WTF is that?!?
Are you sure they didn't move their nuclear program to a few military bases that are off limits to the IAEA inspectors?
The whole point of sanctions is to get a rogue nation to change its behavior.
If you don't remove the sanctions once that behavior is changed, then sanctions are pointless.
Iran has changed its behavior. It has deconstructed its nuclear weapons program. It has removed the very reasons the sanctions against the nuclear weapons program were put in place, and so there is no reason for them any longer.
It must really upset the loons their "Obama gave Iran nukes" narrative has been proven to be utterly false. Despite it being false, they still want the sanctions! WTF is that?!?
Are you sure they didn't move their nuclear program to a few military bases that are off limits to the IAEA inspectors?
I think the obligatory Chamberlain reference you dispell any remaining faith you may have harbored that there actually was a cogent argument to be made against the treaty and events which followed....
The treaty shouldn't be seen in isolation, but rather as part of a process informed by a reasonable conclusion that the constructive participation of Iran is essential in the resulotion of the principal pathologies affecting the region. Relying on "allies" like Saudi Arabia has yielded nothing of value, and has obliged a tolerance of their indisputable indulgence of Islamic extremism.
Nice try at being "cogent." Is this what you mean:
The only way to maintain peace in the Middle East is for Iran to dominate that region?
P.S. The best way to avoid repeating history is to learn from it. But you are not "obliged" to do so.
The whole point of sanctions is to get a rogue nation to change its behavior.
If you don't remove the sanctions once that behavior is changed, then sanctions are pointless.
Iran has changed its behavior. It has deconstructed its nuclear weapons program. It has removed the very reasons the sanctions against the nuclear weapons program were put in place, and so there is no reason for them any longer.
It must really upset the loons their "Obama gave Iran nukes" narrative has been proven to be utterly false. Despite it being false, they still want the sanctions! WTF is that?!?
Are you sure they didn't move their nuclear program to a few military bases that are off limits to the IAEA inspectors?
HOW DARE YOU! In fact, how DOUBLE DARE you to even suggest such a thing! You are attempting to move him off his narrative, and just like all leftys----------> remove the narrative, and the emperor has no clothes.
Improving diplomacy they say. what a joke. After they went and Captured our sailors off a ship held them captive and forced the woman/American CITIZEN to wear a headscarf against her will. that's some real deplomancy there. Were you people just born yesterday or what?
Did my question offend you? I sensed some hostility in your response. I appreciate you listing some action items rather than a bunch of complaints. Curious though, after you've locked down Iran, how do you see everything playing out for future generations?To the Right: With your critical view of the deal, how would you propose to handle the situation with Iran. IE. Do you chip away in attempt to build a bridge to diplomatic relations or do you take an absolutist approach, which I fear would lead to war or growing hostility from a very dangerous potential enemy?? If you prefer the later, please explain why?
Not only a false choice, but disingenuous as well. Could you have presented the same question to Great Britain in 1939?
What I would do is repudiate the nuclear agreement with Iran, reimpose the most extreme sanctions possible and declare The Gulf to be a No Sail Zone for the Iranian Navy. I would then declare Iran to be a Terrorist nation and place ABM sites around it to shoot down any ballistic missiles fired from Iranian soil. I would further declare that an Iranian nuclear attack on another country would be considered a declaration of war against the United States.
Does that answer your "question?"
