Iran and the Nuclear Bomb

[MACAULAY]

It is a maxim that..."If any state forms a great regular army, the bordering states must imitate the example, or submit to a foreign yoke".

Surely that applies to nuclear weapons...and Iran.

But, Iran will be allowed to get a nuclear weapon during Barak Obama's term in office.

In a long line of malfeasances, this one will most haunt his legacy.

Very crazy men run Iran and they are about to be able to blow up anything they want to.

Every sheik, mullah and dictator in control of a few hundred square miles of sand dunes and a few oil fields---will have a nuclear bomb---and it will be the fault of the squalid cowardice of the Obama Administration.

While Iran builds a bomb, Obama spies on us.

 

[Billo_Really]

It is a maxim that..."If any state forms a great regular army, the bordering states must imitate the example, or submit to a foreign yoke".

Surely that applies to nuclear weapons...and Iran.

But, Iran will be allowed to get a nuclear weapon during Barak Obama's term in office.

In a long line of malfeasances, this one will most haunt his legacy.

Very crazy men run Iran and they are about to be able to blow up anything they want to.

Every sheik, mullah and dictator in control of a few hundred square miles of sand dunes and a few oil fields---will have a nuclear bomb---and it will be the fault of the squalid cowardice of the Obama Administration.

While Iran builds a bomb, Obama spies on us.

No one has yet to provide any evidence they are even building one.

Pony up the smoking gun, then we'll talk about what we should do.

 

[MACAULAY]

Neville Chamberlain?

Is that you, Neville?

 

[Billo_Really]

Neville Chamberlain?

Is that you, Neville?

Not the same thing. Germany was invading sovereign nations in front of the whole world. Iran hasn't attacked anyone in over 200 years.

 

[MisterBeale]

It is a maxim that..."If any state forms a great regular army, the bordering states must imitate the example, or submit to a foreign yoke".

Surely that applies to nuclear weapons...and Iran.

But, Iran will be allowed to get a nuclear weapon during Barak Obama's term in office.

In a long line of malfeasances, this one will most haunt his legacy.

Very crazy men run Iran and they are about to be able to blow up anything they want to.

Every sheik, mullah and dictator in control of a few hundred square miles of sand dunes and a few oil fields---will have a nuclear bomb---and it will be the fault of the squalid cowardice of the Obama Administration.

While Iran builds a bomb, Obama spies on us.

^^^^ Watches too much TV.

There is no evidence that they are building a bomb. If they were building a bomb, there is no indication that they don't have every right to build a bomb. What gives us the right to do anything about it? If we did, WE would be the aggressors, WE would do evil.

In 1949 when we knew the Russians were building a bomb, they were far more of a threat to world peace. They were actually invading border nations and incorporating, turning them into Soviet States. We did nothing. It resulted in a cold war that lasted nearly fifty years.

Provide some substantiation that the leaders of Iran are more crazy than the leaders that run the US. In the US, we average a war every twenty years. WE ARE DANGEROUS.

The Persians? By and large they just want the US and Zionist aspirations to leave people alone. What they do is no worse than what we do with the School of the Americas or what Israel does with the Mossad.

 

[Moonglow]

Ft Benning can't be all that bad.

 

[MACAULAY]

Through its proxy's, Iran has already begun the invasion of several countries, including Lebanon and Iraq. Using proxys was Hitler's blueprint.

Do you know that Iran and Hitler's Germany have almost nothing in common. (I suppose that's your point and I agree.)

Its what they don't have in common that is troublesome.

Hitler desperately needed oil. Iran (and its soon to be satellites) are sitting on a mountain of it.

Hitler desperately needed the nuclear bomb. Iran will soon have it.

There is only one thing really that Hitler Germany and Mullah Iran have in common...but it is ominous.

Both are run by Lunatics.

 

[Moonglow]

Never heard of the Holy Roman Empire?

 

[MisterBeale]

There is only one thing really that Hitler Germany and Mullah Iran have in common...but it is ominous.

Both are run by Lunatics.

Again, this is what I find contentious and unsubstantiated. You have watched entirely too much propaganda. Why do you feel this way? Do you even know who runs Iran? Who makes the decisions?

What makes you believe the leader of Iran is a Lunatic? Please, do post some EVIDENCE supporting your wild claims. . .

 

[Billo_Really]

Through its proxy's, Iran has already begun the invasion of several countries, including Lebanon and Iraq. Using proxys was Hitler's blueprint.

Do you know that Iran and Hitler's Germany have almost nothing in common. (I suppose that's your point and I agree.)

Its what they don't have in common that is troublesome.

Hitler desperately needed oil. Iran (and its soon to be satellites) are sitting on a mountain of it.

Hitler desperately needed the nuclear bomb. Iran will soon have it.

There is only one thing really that Hitler Germany and Mullah Iran have in common...but it is ominous.

Both are run by Lunatics.

No one has provided any evidence that they've weaponized their program, so why are you talking like they have?

 

[jwoodie]

Don't be diverted by the Leftist Loons: Prior to Czechoslovakia, Germany had not "invaded" another country. Unless Iran's nuclear weapon capability is eliminated by Israel, we will have no other choice than to station our own nuclear missiles in Saudi Arabia and other friendly countries in the area.

 

[MisterBeale]

Don't be diverted by the Leftist Loons: Prior to Czechoslovakia, Germany had not "invaded" another country. Unless Iran's nuclear weapon capability is eliminated by Israel, we will have no other choice than to station our own nuclear missiles in Saudi Arabia and other friendly countries in the area.

Why?

 

[Moonglow]

Hell, Iran could barely beat Iraq in a war.

 

[Billo_Really]

There is only one thing really that Hitler Germany and Mullah Iran have in common...but it is ominous.

Both are run by Lunatics.

Yeah, but those lunatics are very, very old and 70% of their population is under 30. Now, how many of those kids do you think can't wait for those old mullah's to die off so they can start wearing levis in public again?


Do these people look like they give a shit what the Ayatollah thinks?


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulm4Gj406E8]illegal Rave Party in Iran - YouTube[/ame]


To me, it looks like a typical Spring Break on South Beach.

 

[Billo_Really]

Don't be diverted by the Leftist Loons: Prior to Czechoslovakia, Germany had not "invaded" another country. Unless Iran's nuclear weapon capability is eliminated by Israel, we will have no other choice than to station our own nuclear missiles in Saudi Arabia and other friendly countries in the area.

Why don't you prove the "capability" exists mother-fucker, before you start shooting your war-mongering mouth off?

 

[Moonglow]

During the 1970's I worked at a restaurant that had several Muslims hiding from the Shah.

 

[Moonglow]

Of course they worked there also.

 

[MisterBeale]

Don't be diverted by the Leftist Loons: Prior to Czechoslovakia, Germany had not "invaded" another country. Unless Iran's nuclear weapon capability is eliminated by Israel, we will have no other choice than to station our own nuclear missiles in Saudi Arabia and other friendly countries in the area.

BTW, that is false I believe. The prior past century of Europe up to that point was riddled with warfare. I'd go into a retelling of WWI, but it would bore you. However, trust me, it was still fresh in the minds of living memory for much of Europe.

This point here, is that if industrialized warfare is endemic to this region of the world, it is because the western powers and the banking cartel both helped make it possible, and move the pieces about the map for their objectives.

You need to question what the goals of Iranian leadership are. Oh, that's right, they don't have any other than national defense, so you need to make some bullshit ones up to justify aggression. . . . like maybe, they are lunatics?

 

[jwoodie]

Don't be diverted by the Leftist Loons: Prior to Czechoslovakia, Germany had not "invaded" another country. Unless Iran's nuclear weapon capability is eliminated by Israel, we will have no other choice than to station our own nuclear missiles in Saudi Arabia and other friendly countries in the area.

Why?

Historical Parallel:

In 1979, the Soviet Union began placing IRBMs in Eastern Europe as a means of cowing Western Europe into accommodating Soviet plans for establishing economic hegemony through Western financing and development (and ensuing dependence) of their oil and gas reserves.

Against public opinion in the U.S. and Europe, Reagan announced that we would starting placing IRBMs in Western Europe unless the Soviets removed theirs. Gorbachev backed down and Western Europe's independence was maintained. Without this action, which deprived them of a permanent source of foreign capital, the USSR would probably still be in business.

 

[velvtacheeze]

It is a maxim that..."If any state forms a great regular army, the bordering states must imitate the example, or submit to a foreign yoke".

Surely that applies to nuclear weapons...and Iran.

But, Iran will be allowed to get a nuclear weapon during Barak Obama's term in office.

In a long line of malfeasances, this one will most haunt his legacy.

Very crazy men run Iran and they are about to be able to blow up anything they want to.

Every sheik, mullah and dictator in control of a few hundred square miles of sand dunes and a few oil fields---will have a nuclear bomb---and it will be the fault of the squalid cowardice of the Obama Administration.

While Iran builds a bomb, Obama spies on us.

Neocons already blew it over WMD in Iraq. They turned out to be imaginary. You think you're gonna fool us again?

And IF Iran is trying to get a bomb (again, no convincing evidence exists) it's because they just saw their two neighbors get invaded, and have the US navy saddled up next to them in the Gulf. Who can blame them for wanting to protect themselves in case a GOPer steals the White House again, like Bush did?