Introducing The Anti American Fascist Party pretending to be republicans

[merrill]

This is the Anti American Fascist GOP:

http://www.salon.com/2015/07/31/sec...hristian_reconstructionism/?source=newsletter

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/06/10/242334/john-birch-society-celebrates-koch/

 

[EMH]

Define fascist...

LOL!!!

 

[JGalt]

This is the Anti American Fascist GOP:

http://www.salon.com/2015/07/31/sec...hristian_reconstructionism/?source=newsletter

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/06/10/242334/john-birch-society-celebrates-koch/

Trump or DeSantis, you're pretty much fucked in 2024.

 

[EMH]

Everyone who supports gun control and confiscation, raise your right hand

 

[JGalt]

This is the Anti American Fascist GOP:

http://www.salon.com/2015/07/31/sec...hristian_reconstructionism/?source=newsletter

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/06/10/242334/john-birch-society-celebrates-koch/

"Of the last three presidents, Trump was either the most indifferent or the most obstructed when it came to using government agencies for his own partisan political advantages or to neuter his enemies.

For the Left, Donald Trump is synonymous with “fascism” (or “semi-fascism,” as Joe Biden put it the other day). And for Liz Cheney and most of the NeverTrumpers, he remains an existential threat to democracy.

But to quantify those charges, what exactly has Trump done extralegally - as opposed to his bombast and braggadocio about what he might have wished to have done?

And what are the standards by which to judge this supposed menace?

Did Trump illegally and with a mere signature nullify over $300 billion of contracted student loans—to firm up his college-student and college-graduate base nine weeks before the midterm elections?

If Trump wished to abuse his power over the IRS, he would have followed the Obama model of weaponizing it during a reelection year to go after his ideological enemies.

Did Trump blatantly use the national security apparatus of the government to enhance his own reelection bid in 2020?

Was Trump ever caught on a hot mic promising a Russian president that he would try to ease Russian worries about Eastern European missile defense if only the Russians would give him space during his 2012 campaign for president against Mitt Romney?

Did Trump weaponize the FBI? That is, did the FBI go after journalists, former Obama officials, or Democratic Party activists who variously were attacking Don Jr. or Ivanka on the pretenses of retrieving one of their lost laptops or diaries?

Are there texts of Trump-era FBI agents talking about how to “stop” Hillary Clinton’s or Biden’s election bid?

Did the Trump Justice Department start an investigation of the suspected illegal lobbying of Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, who used the former’s political connections to win large cash payments from foreign governments?

Did Trump order an FBI raid on the Obama home, on rumors that there were thousands of documents under dispute with the National Archives in his possession, especially given the Obama record of fiercely fighting any Freedom of Information Act lawsuits to release his documents?

Was Jake Sullivan’s phone grabbed by the FBI at an airport to determine his role in the Russian collusion hoax?

Are there now any former Trump loyalists who, as “anonymous” officials in cabinet agencies or obstructionists on the National Security Council, are writing op-eds about their stealthy daily efforts to undermine Biden’s executive orders or his administration’s action?

Are there now “50 former intelligence officials” who signed affidavits in support of Trump’s allegations about the authenticity of Hunter’s laptop?

Between 2017 and 2020, did Trump’s team systematically seek to change the voting laws in key states to radically transform traditional balloting, in a mail-in or early voting revolution, in which only 30 percent of the electorate would vote on Election Day?

Was there any “dark money” effort analogous to the efforts of corporate and tech money along with DNC activists and Biden operators in what Time magazine’s Molly Ball described as a “conspiracy” to ensure the defeat of Trump’s opponent?

How about Trump’s efforts to revolutionize the very system of government? Did he promote a court-packing scheme to ensure he might not just get a 5-4 majority, but perhaps an 11-4 conservative advantage in a new 15-justice Supreme Court?

Did he dream up ways of getting rid of the Electoral College so the “blue wall” might never return?

Did Trump as president meet with CIA and FBI directors who, in their weekly and daily briefings, apprised him of efforts to monitor, spy, and infiltrate the campaign of Joe Biden?

The strange thing about Trump was that he did not use extraordinary powers to investigate anyone unlawfully. He boasted, he railed, he screamed, he whined, he became at times crude and obnoxious. But he did not use the FBI, the CIA, the Justice Department, or the IRS to go after the Obamas, the Clintons, or the Bidens.

In fact, of the last three presidents, Trump was either the most inept or indifferent, or the most obstructed concerning any issue of using government agencies for his own partisan political advantages or to neuter his enemies. "

The Strangest Thing About "Semi-Fascist" Trump | ZeroHedge

 

[Woodznutz]

This is the Anti American Fascist GOP:

http://www.salon.com/2015/07/31/sec...hristian_reconstructionism/?source=newsletter

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/06/10/242334/john-birch-society-celebrates-koch/

More wishful thinking than reality. There just aren't enough religious people in the land to accomplish this.

 

[Oddball]

This is the Anti American Fascist GOP:

http://www.salon.com/2015/07/31/sec...hristian_reconstructionism/?source=newsletter

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/06/10/242334/john-birch-society-celebrates-koch/

Salon and Stink Progress....lmfao

 

[sealybobo]

This is the Anti American Fascist GOP:

http://www.salon.com/2015/07/31/sec...hristian_reconstructionism/?source=newsletter

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/06/10/242334/john-birch-society-celebrates-koch/

I like America when the government stays out of religion. I don't like the Christian right telling Republicans to pass laws for them. I want separation of church and state. For example, I'm sure religions don't like abortion. If you believe in God, abortion can't be a good thing. But not all of us believe in God.

And what about Muslims and Mormons and Jews? America is not a Christian nation even if it was founded by them and even if they are the majority of us. Our politicians should represent all of us. Theists and Atheists.

 

[martybegan]

This is the Anti American Fascist GOP:

http://www.salon.com/2015/07/31/sec...hristian_reconstructionism/?source=newsletter

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/06/10/242334/john-birch-society-celebrates-koch/

Reported for no real commentary, just two links and an obvious flamebait thread.

 

[sealybobo]

Trump or DeSantis, you're pretty much fucked in 2024.

If either of them win that means the crazies have taken over again. Not going to happen. It was a fluke Trump won all 5 swing states in 2016. He won them all but he barely won all of them. He's not going to win any of them but even if he does, he's not going to win all of them.

I figure it out yesterday. Republicans want Trump because he won in 2016. They figure if he won before, he can win again. So they don't want to go with an unproven like DeSantis or any of the other hopeful GOP contenders.

If you ask me, they have a better chance of winning the general election. But even they won't win all 5 swing states. Why? Abortion.

 

[Papageorgio]

This is the Anti American Fascist GOP:

http://www.salon.com/2015/07/31/sec...hristian_reconstructionism/?source=newsletter

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/06/10/242334/john-birch-society-celebrates-koch/

Far wingnut sites on the left or the right are still far wingnut sites, people are such lemmings.Why is it that the far wingnuts need to be spoon fed their opinions?

 

[Meister]

OPoster keeps placing threads in the wrong Forum, thread closed
Titles and Opening Posts
1) Title must contain sufficient clues about the ACTUAL expected discussion. Titles like "How stupid are These People" can't be SEARCHED or indexed for search for the use of members or mods to find and manage existing active threads.

2) Titles must be free of INFLAMMATORY words, name calling or "pet names".. Those things are what make a title "baiting".

3) The "user content" in OPs that the existing rules require needs to be "stepped up".. "Get a load of this" -- is no longer sufficient topical content"... Must be 2 lines or more.. The more the better.. Must SUMMARIZE the topic to be discussed and why you think it NEEDS discussion..

To sum that up.. We're REQUIRING the Original Posters to START a clean topical discussion.,. No more juiced incendiary titles and ranting OPs.. If it's important enough for you to dash to a keyboard to poke it in -- need to put in the effort to start the discussion with YOUR views of the topic..

New "Clean Start" Policy on Creating Threads

We always HAVE been a Discussion board. We've always focused almost solely on getting thread topics to be discussed and not on arbitrary content issues.. STILL completely committed to the Free Speech thing.. But lately, the thread titles and Opening Posts have been giving Free Speech a bad...

www.usmessageboard.com