Big Fitz
User Quit *****
- Nov 23, 2009
- 16,917
- 2,522
- 48
I never said there'd be ill effects on people, just the climate, so your greenhouse analogy fails.
And yet, you continue claim that a mild increase in such an insignificant gas will cause great damage. My analogy points out that this planet would BENEFIT from a quadrupling of CO2. Oh damn! Missed the point again.
As for the concentration of CO2, what's important is the % increase, NOT the absolute amount.
You're kidding, right? So how can the increase of an insignificant gas by an insignificant amount in only 200 years matter?
Saying that it's not a threat is just bluster without backup. If the carbon is being sequestered, why is its concentration in the atmosphere going up?
The fact is, there is no proof you will accept if it is contrary to your gaia worshiping religion. Secondly, you can claim that mankind is a significant producer of CO2, but yet, the atmospheric compositional data just doesn't back that up. 20 trillion tons globally may seem like a lot, but compared to the other 200 trillion tons or so, produced by nature is negligible.
Water vapor is a stronger greenhouse gas, but that's not relevant to the discussion.
Bullshit it isn't. It is many multiples stronger than CO2, in 100 times the concentration of CO2, yet you discount it because it debunks your faith utterly.
What IS relevant is that any rise in temp due to CO2 would introduce more vapor into the atmosphere, thereby amplifying its effect.
That's the theory, but proof is still lacking or mixed. Why is it that CO2 has risen in the past only after temperatures increased? Either your cart or your horse is backwards. Regardless it makes you look like an ass.
The last part of your analysis, proves my point that the deniers' positon is purely political, since I as I have shown the science is either above your head or being purposely twisted to fit your bias.
You make the claim but provide no proof. I'm using junior high earth science data to defeat your faith. I am pointing out that you have ZERO non-socialist/fascist solutions. Therefore, global warming by logical extention is nothing more than a taco chip for this ecofascist salsa: a delivery system to global tyranny by idiots.