Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Good luck with that. Oh, by the way, Biden appointed a committee to look into the Supreme Court and that committee did not recommend adding more judges to the court.You better keep that for yourself after we pack 4 more iberals to the Court!
Not happening. But, you are entitled to a fantasy life.Not when we add 4 more liberals to the Court?
We should not know the political affiliation of any judge on any court. If we do, then the court is already biased. But, the solution is not to weigh the court with more bias on the other side. The solution is to have politically unaffiliated judges.Unfortunately, you make a good point! I would like to think, at that level, political ideology would not matter?
Its funny you think I said that.First, thanks for admitting that these things haven't changed any votes.
Kudos to me for pointing out the lunacy on the right...agreeed.Some of your fellow liberals couldn't even admit that. So, kudos to you!
They have ethics rules?Second, can you link to the ethics rules of the Supreme Court that were violated?
I don't see the link to the ethics rules of the Supreme Court. Please post again.Its funny you think I said that.
Kudos to me for pointing out the lunacy on the right...agreeed.
They have ethics rules?
Yet.Good luck with that. Oh, by the way, Biden appointed a committee to look into the Supreme Court and that committee did not recommend adding more judges to the court.
You forget something? You couldn't of included this in your last post?Not happening. But, you are entitled to a fantasy life.
I agree.We should not know the political affiliation of any judge on any court. If we do, then the court is already biased. But, the solution is not to weigh the court with more bias on the other side. The solution is to have politically unaffiliated judges.
You said they had ethic rules. Please feel free to post them. However, one need not know the "rules" to know if something is ethical or not. It's not written down anywhere in my employee handbook, for example, that we aren't supposed to take money from patients for doing our jobs. But nobody in the building would think such an action would be ethical. Unless they are Trump supporters. They have no ethics. As you demonstrate daily. Are you still pretending you don't support the blob?I don't see the link to the ethics rules of the Supreme Court. Please post again.
I've got news for you. Progressives are but a small majority.Yet.
You are entitled to a fantasy life.You forget something? You couldn't of included this in your last post?
I didn't say they had ethics rules. I was repeating lefty nonsense.You said they had ethic rules. Please feel free to post them. However, one need not know the "rules" to know if something is ethical or not. It's not written down anywhere in my employee handbook, for example, that we aren't supposed to take money from patients for doing our jobs. But nobody in the building would think such an action would be ethical. Unless they are Trump supporters. They have no ethics. As you demonstrate daily. Are you still pretending you don't support the blob?
Judges shouldn't be taking gifts from folks who have a case the is before them.
You didn't say it but you're repeating it?I didn't say they had ethics rules. I was repeating lefty nonsense.
We are the majority in this country!I've got news for you. Progressives are but a small majority.
