Indoctrination Secretary Vows to Make Schoolchildren “Good Environmental Citizens"...

What a bastard..

Teaching kids about saving the environment when they should be learning about the second amendment
 
Dirty air and Dirty water is the right of every Republican. Without those, can be truly be "free"?
 
Now you know why the federal government wants to pay teachers instead of it being a local issue. This is the reason. Having teachers no longer answerable to parents in those schools but to Washington DC is a dream of the left.
 
Now you know why the federal government wants to pay teachers instead of it being a local issue. This is the reason. Having teachers no longer answerable to parents in those schools but to Washington DC is a dream of the left.

Where has the federal government said it wants to pay teachers? On right wing propaganda sites?
 
obama-hates-coal.jpg


Environmental Protection: The Enemy of Green

By Anthony J.Ciani
10/24/12

---

While we torture ourselves with possibly baseless, excessive environmental protection, business has already found its own solutions: foreign countries. When businesses feel as though they are "under attack from our own government", they find nicer governments. Many people think that businesses move to China for the cheap labor, but this is simply not the case. The difference is that China does not attack its businesses: the business of China is business. To start a factory in America, you need millions of dollars in lawyers and several years to get through all of the permitting and regulation issues. If you are working with pollutants, you need a workforce that is certified, in multiple ways. Most of your applicants are probably unqualified due to the certifications alone. Meanwhile, all of the unskilled Chinese labor is more than qualified to run a clean shop, in China, if you choose to run a clean shop.

How to fix it? First, we might get rid of certifications. All they do is make our workforce unqualified, and put money into the deep pockets of big education. Look at Chicago's failing public schools, staffed by certified teachers who fail at teaching. Very few of the teachers in private schools are certified, and yet they are generally considered superior. The same is true of all certifications.

Most definitely, listen to the concerns of small businesses. Big businesses like onerous mandates; big government harassment is a good way to kill potential competitors. Just because a business complains about the rules, regulations and mandates does not mean they "just want dirty air and water." Business sees a flaming hoop, with no valid justification, not a reasonable rule to prevent pollution. Politicians should listen, not make ridiculous accusations.


Read more: Articles: Environmental Protection: The Enemy of Green
 
These kids are lucky!

When I was in school, the indoctrination was that Russia was going to attack at any time. We were terrorized by blasting air raid alarms and taught to cower under desks against the imminent catastrophe. It gave us the feeling that life had little hope since everything would be destroyed soon and we either dead or wishing we were.

Much later, we learned the Soviets didn't even have a delivery system and our government knew it!

So, if kids learn that poisoning the environment is a bad idea, even if it doesn't really result in the destruction of the planet, the good outweighs any harm (as if there were any!).
 
Last edited:
These kids are lucky!

When I was in school, the indoctrination was that Russia was going to attack at any time. We were terrorized by blasting air raid alarms and taught to cower under desks against the imminent catastrophe. It gave us the feeling that life had little hope since everything would be destroyed soon and we either dead or wishing we were.

Much later, we learned the Soviets didn't even have a delivery system!

So, if kids learn that poisoning the environment is a bad idea, even if it doesn't really result in the destruction of the planet, the good outweighs any harm (as if there were any!).
I used to stare out the classroom window imagining the MiGs straffing the football field just before the bright light went off! They told us that there was a map in the Kremlin with the Pittsburgh area covered by a bull's eye. "We will be the first to get hit because of our industry" the teachers reasoned with us.

In case of nuclear annihilation, simply crawl under your desk and shade your eyes.
 
Environmental Indoctrination in Public Schools

June 11, 2012 by David L. Goetsch

Indoctrination is one of the favorite strategies of the left for the simple reason that it works. Give liberals the public schools, which America has done, and they will take our children, which they are doing. Liberals understand that the best way to grow the next crop of liberals, environmentalists, and secular humanists is to indoctrinate them while they are young, and the best place to do that is in the classroom. Ironically, most American parents simply hand their children over to public educators for their daily dose of indoctrination with little or no thought to what takes place in the classroom. Too busy or too complacent to pay attention, many American parents who are not liberals, environmentalists, or secular humanists are allowing their children to be systematically transformed into these things.

An example of environmental indoctrination is the “environmental literacy” graduation requirement approved by the Maryland State Board of Education. Maryland educators adopted the environmental literacy requirement—which would more accurately be called the environmental propaganda requirement—at the urging of leftwing organizations that are determined to undermine business, industry, and capitalism. One such organization is the No Child Left Inside Coalition (NCLI). NCLI is an environmentalist group that advocates major societal change to prevent further global warming. Notice the presumptuousness of “further global warming.” NCLI’s agenda, like those of all leftwing environmental groups, is anti-business and anti-industry. The organization is a collection of environmental alarmists who base their anti-business, anti-industry agenda on false assumptions and inaccurate science.

---

Environmental Indoctrination in Public Schools – Patriot Update

That's one of the reasons progressive/liberals don't like vouchers or home schooling...:eusa_shhh:

no... they don't like vouchers because they illegally suck state money out of public education and put it into parochial schools.

home-schooling is just dumb most of the time and a way for parents to teach their kids creationism....

again, most people don't like it because it leaves us where we are...at the bottom of civilized nations in the sciences.

as for the spin given by your wacky right 'patriot update', i fail to see anything wrong with teaching kids to be good stewards of their environment.
 
These kids are lucky!

When I was in school, the indoctrination was that Russia was going to attack at any time. We were terrorized by blasting air raid alarms and taught to cower under desks against the imminent catastrophe. It gave us the feeling that life had little hope since everything would be destroyed soon and we either dead or wishing we were.

Much later, we learned the Soviets didn't even have a delivery system and our government knew it!

So, if kids learn that poisoning the environment is a bad idea, even if it doesn't really result in the destruction of the planet, the good outweighs any harm (as if there were any!).

well said. so what does it tell you when certain types of people so hate anything teaching kids to be good to the planet?
 
Environmental Indoctrination in Public Schools

June 11, 2012 by David L. Goetsch

Indoctrination is one of the favorite strategies of the left for the simple reason that it works. Give liberals the public schools, which America has done, and they will take our children, which they are doing. Liberals understand that the best way to grow the next crop of liberals, environmentalists, and secular humanists is to indoctrinate them while they are young, and the best place to do that is in the classroom. Ironically, most American parents simply hand their children over to public educators for their daily dose of indoctrination with little or no thought to what takes place in the classroom. Too busy or too complacent to pay attention, many American parents who are not liberals, environmentalists, or secular humanists are allowing their children to be systematically transformed into these things.

An example of environmental indoctrination is the “environmental literacy” graduation requirement approved by the Maryland State Board of Education. Maryland educators adopted the environmental literacy requirement—which would more accurately be called the environmental propaganda requirement—at the urging of leftwing organizations that are determined to undermine business, industry, and capitalism. One such organization is the No Child Left Inside Coalition (NCLI). NCLI is an environmentalist group that advocates major societal change to prevent further global warming. Notice the presumptuousness of “further global warming.” NCLI’s agenda, like those of all leftwing environmental groups, is anti-business and anti-industry. The organization is a collection of environmental alarmists who base their anti-business, anti-industry agenda on false assumptions and inaccurate science.

---

Environmental Indoctrination in Public Schools – Patriot Update

That's one of the reasons progressive/liberals don't like vouchers or home schooling...:eusa_shhh:

no... they don't like vouchers because they illegally suck state money out of public education and put it into parochial schools.

home-schooling is just dumb most of the time and a way for parents to teach their kids creationism....

again, most people don't like it because it leaves us where we are...at the bottom of civilized nations in the sciences.

as for the spin given by your wacky right 'patriot update', i fail to see anything wrong with teaching kids to be good stewards of their environment.

You should MOVE HERE...:clap2:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/europe/255821-french-socialists.html

Their Left up your alley...:D
 
"... they don't like vouchers because they illegally suck state money out of public education and put it into parochial schools."

And other non-egalitarian educational institutions.

Public school was conceived for the good of the democracy very early on, before there were 'socialists'. Americans seem able to accept social programs that make sense, but if anyone can pin the word 'socialist' on it, they become allergic. If people want to send their kids to a private school, they are free to do so (though it may be expensive).

The society has decided that it is in its interests to provide a certain minimum education to all without direct charge. That is underwritten by certain taxes. Turning public funds over to private institutions is against this principle, especially when there is the slightest question of religion.
 





(September 23, 2010)- U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan vowed on Tuesday that his department would work to make American children into “good environmental citizens” through federally subsidized school programs beginning as early as kindergarten that teach children about climate change and prepare them “to contribute to the workforce through green jobs.”
“Right now, in the second decade of the 21st century, preparing our children to be good environmental citizens is some of the most important work any of us can do. It’s work that will serve future generations–and quite literally sustain our world,” Duncan said at the Education Department’s “Sustainability Education Summit: Citizenship and Pathways for a Green Economy.”
“This week’s sustainability summit represents the first time that the Department is taking a taking a leadership role in the work of educating the next generation of green citizens and preparing them to contribute to the workforce through green jobs,” said Duncan. “President Obama has made clean, renewable energy a priority because, as he says, it’s the best way to ‘truly transform our economy, to protect our security, and save our planet.’
“Educators have a central role in this. A well educated citizen knows that we must not act in this generation in ways that endanger the next,” said Duncan. “They teach students about how the climate is changing. They explain the science behind climate change and how we can change our daily practices to help save the planet. They have a role in preparing students for jobs in the green economy.”










How horrible.

In an ideal world, children would be horrible environmental citizens. We should encourage them to litter and consume as much as possible.
 
These kids are lucky!

When I was in school, the indoctrination was that Russia was going to attack at any time. We were terrorized by blasting air raid alarms and taught to cower under desks against the imminent catastrophe. It gave us the feeling that life had little hope since everything would be destroyed soon and we either dead or wishing we were.

Much later, we learned the Soviets didn't even have a delivery system and our government knew it!

So, if kids learn that poisoning the environment is a bad idea, even if it doesn't really result in the destruction of the planet, the good outweighs any harm (as if there were any!).

aren't you dramatizing that a bit?

well, maybe quite a bit?
 
Indoctrination is one of the favorite strategies of the left for the simple reason that it works. Give liberals the public schools, which America has done, and they will take our children, which they are doing. Liberals understand that the best way to grow the next crop of liberals, environmentalists, and secular humanists is to indoctrinate them while they are young, and the best place to do that is in the classroom. Ironically, most American parents simply hand their children over to public educators for their daily dose of indoctrination with little or no thought to what takes place in the classroom. Too busy or too complacent to pay attention, many American parents who are not liberals, environmentalists, or secular humanists are allowing their children to be systematically transformed into these things.


This is a bunch of hooey.

"How do you know what happens in classrooms on a day-to-day basis?"

Answer: "I don't know exactly, I read it somewhere, heard it on a radio talk show, or saw it on TV."
 
Spreading the word about sustainability

Wednesday 24 October 2012

Children-at-a-primary-sch-001.jpg
One of the agency's aims is to encourage behavioural change in children between the ages of four and 14. Photograph: Alamy

An important element of the Guardian Digital Agency's work continues to be around sustainability-related projects.

One of the agency's ongoing projects is the management of The Pod, a website and offline education programme. Its purpose is to encourage behavioural change among school children aged four to 14 around sustainability and the environment.

---
Spreading the word about sustainability | Sustainability | guardian.co.uk

------------
http://www.usmessageboard.com/education/255605-campus-sustainability-day-oct-24-a.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/current-events/254624-sustainability-obamas-green-agenda.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/race-...-venture-network-race-and-sustainability.html


...
 
Last edited:
What's so terrible about educating kids about preserving raw materials?

There is no infinite supply you know.

I bought a sustainable Martin SWDGT guitar. Brazilian rosewood is all but gone, ebony is nearing the same status, big slabs of spruce for tops is also running out.

Try buying an accoustic guitar with Brazilian rosewood and see what a used one costs.

The guitar is made from wood from managed forests. The spruce top (which has tight grain and bear clawing) is reclaimed from the trash heap where it would have been destroyed. The sound it creates is heavenly.
The back and sides are solid cherry which is halfway between rosewood and mahogany (which is soon going to be in very short supply).

It sounds great and with good wood shortages this is going to be the future of guitar construction.

Sometimes this thinking can have a positive effect--no usage of diminishing woods and a great sounding instrument.

What should be taught, that supplies are endless as are landfills and we should waste, destroy, and plunder with glee?
 
What's so terrible about educating kids about preserving raw materials?

There is no infinite supply you know.

I bought a sustainable Martin SWDGT guitar. Brazilian rosewood is all but gone, ebony is nearing the same status, big slabs of spruce for tops is also running out.

Try buying an accoustic guitar with Brazilian rosewood and see what a used one costs.

The guitar is made from wood from managed forests. The spruce top (which has tight grain and bear clawing) is reclaimed from the trash heap where it would have been destroyed. The sound it creates is heavenly.
The back and sides are solid cherry which is halfway between rosewood and mahogany (which is soon going to be in very short supply).

It sounds great and with good wood shortages this is going to be the future of guitar construction.

Sometimes this thinking can have a positive effect--no usage of diminishing woods and a great sounding instrument.

What should be taught, that supplies are endless as are landfills and we should waste, destroy, and plunder with glee?

So your against what you said in post #37??? flip flopper or an oxymoron-or...:D
 

Forum List

Back
Top