“Income Inequality”: A Crisis of Stupidity

the Right admits Socialism solved real poverty

the right admits that when when Red China switched to capitalism it instantly eliminated 40% of world poverty and that the left is criminal for not being able to admit they are stupid and wrong.
Because the left isn't wrong. The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.
 
Because the left isn't wrong.
yes left is deadly and criminal and psycho because it can't accept that when China switched to Republican capitalism it eliminated 40% of the world's poverty after 10,000 years of en masse starvation.
Yes, the right is even more dangerous than that; simply because they expect us to believe them when they usually only have fallacy to work with and claim they are for the "gospel Truth".

Citation, please.
 
...The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.

Nonsensical nonsense.
All rational people know that a rising tide raises all ships (though not necessarily equally).
Only loony lefties and anarchists try to make your consistently silly arguments.
 
...The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.

Nonsensical nonsense.
All rational people know that a rising tide raises all ships (though not necessarily equally).
Only loony lefties and anarchists try to make your consistently silly arguments.

if you can discern an argument in his pompous illiterate gibberish please let me know what it is.
 
...The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.

Nonsensical nonsense.
All rational people know that a rising tide raises all ships (though not necessarily equally).
Only loony lefties and anarchists try to make your consistently silly arguments.

All informed people know a rising tide will swamp a vessel not properly tied to a dock.
 
...The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.

Nonsensical nonsense.
All rational people know that a rising tide raises all ships (though not necessarily equally).
Only loony lefties and anarchists try to make your consistently silly arguments.

All informed people know a rising tide will swamp a vessel not properly tied to a dock.

You confuse a rising tide with a storm.
 
...The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.

Nonsensical nonsense.
All rational people know that a rising tide raises all ships (though not necessarily equally).
Only loony lefties and anarchists try to make your consistently silly arguments.

All informed people know a rising tide will swamp a vessel not properly tied to a dock.

Informed people know that a ship at sea is not tied to a dock, and a large vessel tied to a dock at low tied, will put a strain on the lines and either break them, destroy the cleats or the dock itself when the tide changes and there is not enough slack in the lines.
 
...The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.

Nonsensical nonsense.
All rational people know that a rising tide raises all ships (though not necessarily equally).
Only loony lefties and anarchists try to make your consistently silly arguments.

All informed people know a rising tide will swamp a vessel not properly tied to a dock.

You confuse a rising tide with a storm.

No I didn't. You're simply not very bright.
 
...The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.

Nonsensical nonsense.
All rational people know that a rising tide raises all ships (though not necessarily equally).
Only loony lefties and anarchists try to make your consistently silly arguments.

This is misleading for a lot of reasons. First off this premise is often very dependent on looking at well being in very crude ways. For example it tends to place an emphasis on superficial things like consumer goods while failing to account for other things like crime rate and their place in the social order.

It is also a premise that tends to rely on transfer payments to be true. So if we really want to claim that rising tides lift all ships we also have to make sure we are not arguing to cut benefits with the next breath.

It is also a premise that tends to rely on the emotional arguments attributed to increases in technology that make everyone see life as getting better but technological progress only does so much for the poor.
 
but technological progress only does so much for the poor.

how stupid!! they have much of the latest technology and arguably benefit from it more than the rich . Much of the third world has cell phones for example whereas they could not have afforded land lines!!
 
but technological progress only does so much for the poor.

how stupid!! they have much of the latest technology and arguably benefit from it more than the rich . Much of the third world has cell phones for example whereas they could not have afforded land lines!!

This type of thinking is a good example of how extra importance is placed on technological advances. Having a cell phone is cool and all but it isn't as important as having enough to eat, living in a safe neighborhood, living without being discriminated against because the color or your skin, or having a good home to live in, or one of the many other serious issues poor people face. A phone is great but it is just a phone.
 
...The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.

Nonsensical nonsense.
All rational people know that a rising tide raises all ships (though not necessarily equally).
Only loony lefties and anarchists try to make your consistently silly arguments.
Too bad the wealthiest know how to simply purchase better socialism than the rest of us (under our form of Capitalism). silly goose :p
 
Last edited:
...The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.

Nonsensical nonsense.
All rational people know that a rising tide raises all ships (though not necessarily equally).
Only loony lefties and anarchists try to make your consistently silly arguments.

if you can discern an argument in his pompous illiterate gibberish please let me know what it is.
A social, reading comprehension ethic is too much work for the right. I got it.
 
...The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.

Nonsensical nonsense.
All rational people know that a rising tide raises all ships (though not necessarily equally).
Only loony lefties and anarchists try to make your consistently silly arguments.

if you can discern an argument in his pompous illiterate gibberish please let me know what it is.
A social, reading comprehension ethic is too much work for the right. I got it.

Here's a great way for the libs to reduce income inequality.

1) Why not let another 30 million illegals in??
 
...The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.

Nonsensical nonsense.
All rational people know that a rising tide raises all ships (though not necessarily equally).
Only loony lefties and anarchists try to make your consistently silly arguments.
Too bad the wealthiest know how to simply purchase better socialism than the rest of us (under our form of Capitalism). silly goose :p

You are like a child, DP:
socialism
  1. a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
 
...The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.

Nonsensical nonsense.
All rational people know that a rising tide raises all ships (though not necessarily equally).
Only loony lefties and anarchists try to make your consistently silly arguments.
Not when the wealthiest can simply "purchase" better privileges and immunities under our form of Capitalism, regardless of the equality preferred by our form of socialism.
 
...The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.

Nonsensical nonsense.
All rational people know that a rising tide raises all ships (though not necessarily equally).
Only loony lefties and anarchists try to make your consistently silly arguments.

if you can discern an argument in his pompous illiterate gibberish please let me know what it is.
A social, reading comprehension ethic is too much work for the right. I got it.

Here's a great way for the libs to reduce income inequality.

1) Why not let another 30 million illegals in??
We have a Commerce Clause and should not be losing money on Commerce at our borders; only Bad socialists and worse Capitalists, do that.
 
...The right is complains everyday that the least wealthy in the US are not really poor enough when compared to the more Capitalist, third world.

Nonsensical nonsense.
All rational people know that a rising tide raises all ships (though not necessarily equally).
Only loony lefties and anarchists try to make your consistently silly arguments.
Too bad the wealthiest know how to simply purchase better socialism than the rest of us (under our form of Capitalism). silly goose :p

You are like a child, DP:
socialism
  1. a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
FDR's brand of socialism qualifies.
 

Forum List

Back
Top