In honor of obama's speech, the crimes of Imperial Japan.........

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,968
52,237
2,290
Let us never forget how Japan conducted itself during the war......and why ending the war with the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, military targets, was necessary to save American lives.....

War Crimes of Imperial Japan: A Lesson In Moral Equivalence for Mr. Obama - Breitbart

Let’s correct that oversight, to help the President understand why moral equivalence is the dim refuge of lazy minds, and equating American troops with the Axis forces they defeated is an outrage.

----

In an act of pure, deliberate sadism, because they were enraged by stiff American resistance during the siege, the Japanese forced their prisoners to march a hundred miles to a prison camp on foot. Many of the prisoners were killed out of hand, including anyone who dared to ask for water… and anyone who collapsed from dehydration. POWs reportedJapanese soldiers taking away their meager supply of water and feeding it to horses while they watched. Starving men were tortured with false offers of food. Prisoners who accepted gifts of food from civilians along the route were murdered.

Some were murdered merely for possessing Japanese items, including currency. They were killed by beheading and run through with bayonets, as well as gunshots. Bayonet victims died from orgies of frenzied stabbing, not clean and swift impalement. Some of the captives were reportedly driven insane by exposure to the sun. They were also crammed into barbed-wire pens were malaria, dengue fever, dysentery, and other diseases ran wild.

It has been estimated that between 5,000 and 11,000 of Japan’s prisoners were killed during the Bataan Death March. That wasn’t the only death march the Empire perpetrated, either. The prisoners of Sandakan were subjected to multiple forced marches, once the Japanese lost interest in using them as slave labor. By the time they were finished, only six of the original 2,390 prisoners were still alive.

One of the Japanese torture methods recounted by survivors of Sandakan involved pouring water down a prisoner’s throat until his stomach became distended, and then kicking him in the stomach.

-----------------------------------

That was a literal rape, involving up to 80,000 sexual assaults. The once-prosperous city of Nanking, capital of Nationalist China at the time, was laid waste. Japanese conquerors murdered men, women, and children by the thousands, leaving bodies piled up along the streets. The Yangtze River turned red from all the blood.


Bodies of victims along Qinhuai River out of Nanking’s west gate during Nanking Massacre. (Wikimedia Commons)

The death toll ran into the hundreds of thousands, leaving some modern observers to speak of genocide. The exact body count remains a matter of political dispute between Japan and China to this day. The figure generally accepted at post-war trials was over 200,000, but some think the total number is closer to 400,000.


 
A lesson in moral relativism (again).


No twit........the Empire of Japan was evil......and refused to surrender even when it was defeated........and wasting American lives ending the war would have been insane.....
 
"Evil" is a moral judgment, and depends upon the religious orientation. Moral relativism. Thanks for the lesson (again).
 
"Evil" is a moral judgment, and depends upon the religious orientation. Moral relativism. Thanks for the lesson (again).
Tell that to survivors of the Bataan death march.
Being democrat is a relative reason and logic orientation.
Perhaps; you might want to ask 'democrat'.
There are probably few survivors of that horror, and they probably aren't interested in philosophical discussions about it. We could hardly blame them.
 
WWII Japan was the template for ISIS. No wonder Obama is apologizing.

?.!.
Japan was horrible, so the U.S. is justified in being horrible, even though America claims to be a country of law and moral superiority. That is the definition of shifting morality to accommodate the situation; i.e., moral relativism. That is the theme of the o.p. The post quoted would seem to be off topic.
 
"Evil" is a moral judgment, and depends upon the religious orientation. Moral relativism. Thanks for the lesson (again).
No, yoiu degenerate punk, evil is not relevant as some things are nearly universally understood to be evil, such as murder, child molestation and thuggery.

But best of all, people are waking up and realizing that ass hats like you are full of shyte and people are now defending themselves across the USA to great effect and it will eventually be true of all Western Christendom.
 
Japan was horrible, so the U.S. is justified in being horrible, even though America claims to be a country of law and moral superiority.

It is called 'self defense' idiot. They started the shit and we ended it.

Get used to it, because a hell of a lot more is coming to Hate America First degenerates.
 
The Japanese got off easy. After the war ended, we forgave all but a few of their leaders and then they built a prosperous industrial nation under American military protection, which meant they paid almost nothing for their own defense.
 
"Evil" is a moral judgment, and depends upon the religious orientation. Moral relativism. Thanks for the lesson (again).
Tell that to survivors of the Bataan death march.
Being democrat is a relative reason and logic orientation.
Perhaps; you might want to ask 'democrat'.
There are probably few survivors of that horror, and they probably aren't interested in philosophical discussions about it. We could hardly blame them.
Asking democrat would be pointless as democrat lacks the reason and logic to understand.
As for Bataan death march survivors, you are repeating my point about the irrelevance of moral judgment.
 
It is obvious that a foul mouthed response means no substantial retort is available to the poor, meager intellect.
Thanks for the lesson (again).
 
WWII Japan was the template for ISIS. No wonder Obama is apologizing.

?.!.
Japan was horrible, so the U.S. is justified in being horrible, even though America claims to be a country of law and moral superiority. That is the definition of shifting morality to accommodate the situation; i.e., moral relativism. That is the theme of the o.p. The post quoted would seem to be off topic.
No, you're confusing morality with survival.
 
"Evil" is a moral judgment, and depends upon the religious orientation. Moral relativism. Thanks for the lesson (again).
Tell that to survivors of the Bataan death march.
Being democrat is a relative reason and logic orientation.
Perhaps; you might want to ask 'democrat'.
There are probably few survivors of that horror, and they probably aren't interested in philosophical discussions about it. We could hardly blame them.
Asking democrat would be pointless as democrat lacks the reason and logic to understand.
As for Bataan death march survivors, you are repeating my point about the irrelevance of moral judgment.
Yes, so calling Japan "evil" is irrelevant. Thank you.
 
It is obvious that a foul mouthed response means no substantial retort is available to the poor, meager intellect.
Thanks for the lesson (again).
The only 'meager intellect' here is you and your head-up-the-ass libtards who think that there is some great moral puzzle to defending innocent life.

Eat shit.
 
"Evil" is a moral judgment, and depends upon the religious orientation. Moral relativism. Thanks for the lesson (again).
Tell that to survivors of the Bataan death march.
Being democrat is a relative reason and logic orientation.
Perhaps; you might want to ask 'democrat'.
There are probably few survivors of that horror, and they probably aren't interested in philosophical discussions about it. We could hardly blame them.
Asking democrat would be pointless as democrat lacks the reason and logic to understand.
As for Bataan death march survivors, you are repeating my point about the irrelevance of moral judgment.
Yes, so calling Japan "evil" is irrelevant. Thank you.
Japan was evil. Proactively evil. That is not a survival thing. That is a greed thing.
 
It is obvious that a foul mouthed response means no substantial retort is available to the poor, meager intellect.
Thanks for the lesson (again).
The only 'meager intellect' here is you and your head-up-the-ass libtards who think that there is some great moral puzzle to defending innocent life.

Eat shit.
To paraphrase Jesus, it is not what goes into a man's mouth that defiles him, but what comes out.
Thank you (again).
 

Forum List

Back
Top