In Aurora, Colorado, it is ILLEGAL to stop a massacre

[tererun]

Yes, the police should enforce the laws, all of them and for everyone. If someone had brought a weapon illegally into the movie theater they would have broken laws just like the shooter did and they deserve to be charged.

No, you are not above the law because you own a gun. no you are not a hero, cowboy, or the police because you have a gun. no one hired your dumb ass to play hero, and you do have to abide by the same laws everyone else does, including responsible and lawful gun owners, even if you own a gun.

Besides, this is why we have variable sentencing recommendations for crimes. This way if someone acted to stop the crime and did not harm anyone else they would have been given a minimum sentence, or possibly even been pardoned by the state government for acting if they did so and helped.

So thank you OP for completely twisting the situation, and I look foreward to yoru time destroying facts on fix noise.

Why would they deserve to get charged? Because you said so? There's 12 people six feet under disagree with your "deserves" bull shit.'

And yea, the police are perfect. We can count on them, right?

They would deserve to get charged for breaking a law. I am assuming that it is illegal to bring a gun into the movie theater. it would be illegal for that guy and you. If you break the law and are caught then you deserve to be charged. That is not me telling you that, that is the law of most lands.

 

[tererun]

Yes, the police should enforce the laws, all of them and for everyone. If someone had brought a weapon illegally into the movie theater they would have broken laws just like the shooter did and they deserve to be charged.

No, you are not above the law because you own a gun. no you are not a hero, cowboy, or the police because you have a gun. no one hired your dumb ass to play hero, and you do have to abide by the same laws everyone else does, including responsible and lawful gun owners, even if you own a gun.

Besides, this is why we have variable sentencing recommendations for crimes. This way if someone acted to stop the crime and did not harm anyone else they would have been given a minimum sentence, or possibly even been pardoned by the state government for acting if they did so and helped.

So thank you OP for completely twisting the situation, and I look foreward to yoru time destroying facts on fix noise.

How naive, and so if the government is corrupt and the police become like the gestapo or kgb? What then, just bend over and take it?

You do realize that despite the fact the founding fathers wrote in an armed populace as a check on the government that does not allow you to go off shooting the government representatives because you disagree with them? I have to ask the simple questions. There is no protection for you using your gun in an illegal manner, and that means having it in prohibited places. Your right to have guns is not universal, and no one is saying it should be.

 

[Noomi]

The police might have filed charges, but they'd have to drop them because the public backlash against them would be deafening.

 

[tererun]

I'd waste a murderer no matter what the consequenses

Wait a sec, I had to read that twice, Moonglow is that really you?

yep, and I will castrate pedophiles.
I am a meann mother fucker when it comes to certain matters. The damn justice system is geared to have compassion for the crimminally insane, well I am available for, dirty deeds done dirt cheap!.

Though I agree with your ideas, the fact is that if you go out and hunt down murderers and child molestors you will be jailed for assault. It is simply not legal and no one gave you authority to do that. You have a right to stop a criminal action if you see it happening, but you really have to be aware of where your rights end or else you can find yourself in jail.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yes, the police should enforce the laws, all of them and for everyone. If someone had brought a weapon illegally into the movie theater they would have broken laws just like the shooter did and they deserve to be charged.

No, you are not above the law because you own a gun. no you are not a hero, cowboy, or the police because you have a gun. no one hired your dumb ass to play hero, and you do have to abide by the same laws everyone else does, including responsible and lawful gun owners, even if you own a gun.

Besides, this is why we have variable sentencing recommendations for crimes. This way if someone acted to stop the crime and did not harm anyone else they would have been given a minimum sentence, or possibly even been pardoned by the state government for acting if they did so and helped.

So thank you OP for completely twisting the situation, and I look foreward to yoru time destroying facts on fix noise.

No, you are not above the law because you own a gun. no you are not a hero, cowboy, or the police because you have a gun.

My life is above the law, human life is above the law.
Except yours and the rest of the anti gun scum sucking bitches.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Shock Revelation: City of Aurora, Colorado Would Have Arrested Anyone Who Stopped the Batman Massacre With a Concealed Weapon

by Mike Adams

Two days ago I asked the commonsense question, "Why didn't anyone fight back against James Holmes, the shooter who shot so many people in the Batman movie theater?"

Now the answer has become clear: Because Aurora, Colorado already has strict gun control laws on the books that make it:

Illegal to carry a concealed weapon, even if you're a law-abiding citizen.
Illegal to discharge a firearm in public unless you are a peace officer.
Thus, any person who would have shot James Holmes and stopped the massacre would, themselves, have been arrested as a criminal!


In Aurora, Colorado, it is illegal to stop a massacre

.

HOW TO STOP A MASSACRE...The Libertarian Way

The average police response 6 minutes

The average Concealed carry Response 5 seconds, thou do the math.

.

Less than 2 seconds if you fire from the hip.

 

[tererun]

Shock Revelation: City of Aurora, Colorado Would Have Arrested Anyone Who Stopped the Batman Massacre With a Concealed Weapon

by Mike Adams

Two days ago I asked the commonsense question, "Why didn't anyone fight back against James Holmes, the shooter who shot so many people in the Batman movie theater?"

Now the answer has become clear: Because Aurora, Colorado already has strict gun control laws on the books that make it:

Illegal to carry a concealed weapon, even if you're a law-abiding citizen.
Illegal to discharge a firearm in public unless you are a peace officer.
Thus, any person who would have shot James Holmes and stopped the massacre would, themselves, have been arrested as a criminal!


In Aurora, Colorado, it is illegal to stop a massacre

.

HOW TO STOP A MASSACRE...The Libertarian Way

The average police response 6 minutes

The average Concealed carry Response 5 seconds, thou do the math.

.

You know, I am reminded of the illogic that says that Apple computers never get viruses. This is because few people used them and people who write viruses to do damage would write them for more popular systems.

That sort of thing is the bane of the idea that everyone should have guns. Right now there are a lot of responsible people who go through the effort to own a gun, and they do the right thing because they are law abiding people. When you start giving guns to everyone without concern things will get out of hand. This is because a lot of people don't have guns for good fucking reasons. I would never get a carry permit. This is because i have a flash temper and i would shoot someone. I would be great in a gunfight as i have experience and tactical training. I do not carry a gun because i also have an overwhelming urge to kill idiots. You cannot just flood the streets with guns and think things will be fine.

Really, you don't want you average person carrying a gun with them at all times because look at all the dumb decisions they make. Yes, they would do the same thing with a gun.

 

[tererun]

The police might have filed charges, but they'd have to drop them because the public backlash against them would be deafening.

They would probably plea it down and not drop the charges.

 

[tererun]

Yes, the police should enforce the laws, all of them and for everyone. If someone had brought a weapon illegally into the movie theater they would have broken laws just like the shooter did and they deserve to be charged.

No, you are not above the law because you own a gun. no you are not a hero, cowboy, or the police because you have a gun. no one hired your dumb ass to play hero, and you do have to abide by the same laws everyone else does, including responsible and lawful gun owners, even if you own a gun.

Besides, this is why we have variable sentencing recommendations for crimes. This way if someone acted to stop the crime and did not harm anyone else they would have been given a minimum sentence, or possibly even been pardoned by the state government for acting if they did so and helped.

So thank you OP for completely twisting the situation, and I look foreward to yoru time destroying facts on fix noise.

No, you are not above the law because you own a gun. no you are not a hero, cowboy, or the police because you have a gun.

My life is above the law, human life is above the law.
Except yours and the rest of the anti gun scum sucking bitches.

Ummm, dufus I support gun rights. Your life may be above the law, but your vessel on earth, AKA your body, is not. But feel free to test that as you will, I am quite sure the authorites would be happy to help you into your cell.

 

[tererun]

Shock Revelation: City of Aurora, Colorado Would Have Arrested Anyone Who Stopped the Batman Massacre With a Concealed Weapon

by Mike Adams

Two days ago I asked the commonsense question, "Why didn't anyone fight back against James Holmes, the shooter who shot so many people in the Batman movie theater?"

Now the answer has become clear: Because Aurora, Colorado already has strict gun control laws on the books that make it:

Illegal to carry a concealed weapon, even if you're a law-abiding citizen.
Illegal to discharge a firearm in public unless you are a peace officer.
Thus, any person who would have shot James Holmes and stopped the massacre would, themselves, have been arrested as a criminal!


In Aurora, Colorado, it is illegal to stop a massacre

.

HOW TO STOP A MASSACRE...The Libertarian Way

The average police response 6 minutes

The average Concealed carry Response 5 seconds, thou do the math.

.

Less than 2 seconds if you fire from the hip.

Yeah, don't take a line of sight. That is safe in a situation with people running all over the place. please do not make my point any easier with your dumbassery.

 

[MuadDib]

That doesn't make sense since Colorado is a concealed weapons state. No city can pass a law that violates state law.

If I have my weapon on me and I drive through Aurora to pick someone at the airport, they can't arrest me for having a legal weapon and permit going through their city.

I would love to see some idiot liberal try to prosecute someone that kills THE shooter at a massacre.....

They just might be able to. Watch this video.

Dealing With America

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yes, the police should enforce the laws, all of them and for everyone. If someone had brought a weapon illegally into the movie theater they would have broken laws just like the shooter did and they deserve to be charged.

No, you are not above the law because you own a gun. no you are not a hero, cowboy, or the police because you have a gun. no one hired your dumb ass to play hero, and you do have to abide by the same laws everyone else does, including responsible and lawful gun owners, even if you own a gun.

Besides, this is why we have variable sentencing recommendations for crimes. This way if someone acted to stop the crime and did not harm anyone else they would have been given a minimum sentence, or possibly even been pardoned by the state government for acting if they did so and helped.

So thank you OP for completely twisting the situation, and I look foreward to yoru time destroying facts on fix noise.

No, you are not above the law because you own a gun. no you are not a hero, cowboy, or the police because you have a gun.

My life is above the law, human life is above the law.
Except yours and the rest of the anti gun scum sucking bitches.

Ummm, dufus I support gun rights. Your life may be above the law, but your vessel on earth, AKA your body, is not. But feel free to test that as you will, I am quite sure the authorites would be happy to help you into your cell.

The most idiotic post I have ever read and that includes truth don't matter.

 

[Contumacious]

Shock Revelation: City of Aurora, Colorado Would Have Arrested Anyone Who Stopped the Batman Massacre With a Concealed Weapon

by Mike Adams

Two days ago I asked the commonsense question, "Why didn't anyone fight back against James Holmes, the shooter who shot so many people in the Batman movie theater?"

Now the answer has become clear: Because Aurora, Colorado already has strict gun control laws on the books that make it:

Illegal to carry a concealed weapon, even if you're a law-abiding citizen.
Illegal to discharge a firearm in public unless you are a peace officer.
Thus, any person who would have shot James Holmes and stopped the massacre would, themselves, have been arrested as a criminal!


In Aurora, Colorado, it is illegal to stop a massacre

.

You actually believe this? No doubt there are exceptions when lives are being taken, read the entire statute/code provision.

According to current Colorado law, it is illegal to carry a concealed weapon in all the following cities:

Aurora, Boulder, Broomfield, Colorado Springs, Denver, Englewood, Lakewood, Littleton, Longmont, Northglenn, Pueblo, Thornton, Westminster, Wheat Ridge.

It is illegal to even OWN a large number of firearms in Thornton and Lafayette. In Aurora, it is illegal to carry a firearm in a vehicle! Thus, even driving to a movie theater with a firearm in your own car makes you a criminal.

These laws did not stop James Holmes from driving with a loaded gun in his car, along with explosives that were also found in his car. Once again, this demonstrates that gun control laws only disarm the public while allowing criminals to have "free reign" over a completely helpless public."

.

 

[Black_Label]

Yes, the police should enforce the laws, all of them and for everyone. If someone had brought a weapon illegally into the movie theater they would have broken laws just like the shooter did and they deserve to be charged.

No, you are not above the law because you own a gun. no you are not a hero, cowboy, or the police because you have a gun. no one hired your dumb ass to play hero, and you do have to abide by the same laws everyone else does, including responsible and lawful gun owners, even if you own a gun.

Besides, this is why we have variable sentencing recommendations for crimes. This way if someone acted to stop the crime and did not harm anyone else they would have been given a minimum sentence, or possibly even been pardoned by the state government for acting if they did so and helped.

So thank you OP for completely twisting the situation, and I look foreward to yoru time destroying facts on fix noise.

No, you are not above the law because you own a gun. no you are not a hero, cowboy, or the police because you have a gun.

My life is above the law, human life is above the law.
Except yours and the rest of the anti gun scum sucking bitches.

You must hate Willard with a passion then for his strongly anti-gun laws and stances. If not you are a completely hypocrite.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yes, the police should enforce the laws, all of them and for everyone. If someone had brought a weapon illegally into the movie theater they would have broken laws just like the shooter did and they deserve to be charged.

No, you are not above the law because you own a gun. no you are not a hero, cowboy, or the police because you have a gun. no one hired your dumb ass to play hero, and you do have to abide by the same laws everyone else does, including responsible and lawful gun owners, even if you own a gun.

Besides, this is why we have variable sentencing recommendations for crimes. This way if someone acted to stop the crime and did not harm anyone else they would have been given a minimum sentence, or possibly even been pardoned by the state government for acting if they did so and helped.

So thank you OP for completely twisting the situation, and I look foreward to yoru time destroying facts on fix noise.

No, you are not above the law because you own a gun. no you are not a hero, cowboy, or the police because you have a gun.

My life is above the law, human life is above the law.
Except yours and the rest of the anti gun scum sucking bitches.

You must hate Willard with a passion then for his strongly anti-gun laws and stances. If not you are a completely hypocrite.

If you can support obama you will not have a problem supporting romney. Which makes you the biggest hypocrite of all.

 

[Black_Label]

My life is above the law, human life is above the law.
Except yours and the rest of the anti gun scum sucking bitches.

You must hate Willard with a passion then for his strongly anti-gun laws and stances. If not you are a completely hypocrite.

If you can support obama you will not have a problem supporting romney.

Failed deflection attempt. Do you hate romney because of his very strong anti-gun stances which you call "scum sucking bitches"? Or are you a completely hypocritical far right wing partisan hack that will still support Willard simply because of the (R) next to his name?

 

[tererun]

My life is above the law, human life is above the law.
Except yours and the rest of the anti gun scum sucking bitches.

Ummm, dufus I support gun rights. Your life may be above the law, but your vessel on earth, AKA your body, is not. But feel free to test that as you will, I am quite sure the authorites would be happy to help you into your cell.

The most idiotic post I have ever read and that includes truth don't matter.

I am not surprised a person of your intellect is not able to understand me.

Anyway, since you don't have a point i guess this means i beat you.

 

[editec]

Oh goodie...another thread designed to give people the change to tell us what bad asses they are.


WOW! You would shoot the bad guys cause you da man.

I never cease being impressed by you internet gun queers..

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Ummm, dufus I support gun rights. Your life may be above the law, but your vessel on earth, AKA your body, is not. But feel free to test that as you will, I am quite sure the authorites would be happy to help you into your cell.

The most idiotic post I have ever read and that includes truth don't matter.

I am not surprised a person of your intellect is not able to understand me.

Anyway, since you don't have a point i guess this means i beat you.

Your blather is soaking your computer screen.
I'm not surprised that you think that human life is not above any law. I hope you will find the need to defend your life and can't do it because e you are afraid of breaking a law.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You must hate Willard with a passion then for his strongly anti-gun laws and stances. If not you are a completely hypocrite.

If you can support obama you will not have a problem supporting romney.

Failed deflection attempt. Do you hate romney because of his very strong anti-gun stances which you call "scum sucking bitches"? Or are you a completely hypocritical far right wing partisan hack that will still support Willard simply because of the (R) next to his name?

Pull your head out of obama's ass the shit flumes are making you write stupid shit.