http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/26/us/politics/26alaska.html?_r=1&hp
The good old Tea Party strikes again!
The good old Tea Party strikes again!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/26/us/politics/26alaska.html?_r=1&hp
The good old Tea Party strikes again!
I was reading up on this situation on the web. In Alaska, the law states they don't have to actually check the write in ballots unless there's a chance the write in is the winner, and after that it comes down to voter intent.
It's very likely that if Murkowski wins, the GOP will be sending armies of Lawyers to Alaska this year to challenge each and every misspelled ballot. That'll be tough for Murkowski to fight. You'll see a lot of calls for her to just give it up.
I'd like to see her win, but the idea that even if she does win she's facing an uphill legal battle to take her seat.... well it doesn't look good.
I was reading up on this situation on the web. In Alaska, the law states they don't have to actually check the write in ballots unless there's a chance the write in is the winner, and after that it comes down to voter intent.
It's very likely that if Murkowski wins, the GOP will be sending armies of Lawyers to Alaska this year to challenge each and every misspelled ballot. That'll be tough for Murkowski to fight. You'll see a lot of calls for her to just give it up.
I'd like to see her win, but the idea that even if she does win she's facing an uphill legal battle to take her seat.... well it doesn't look good.
Murkowski has already proven that she is a fighter.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/26/us/politics/26alaska.html?_r=1&hp
The good old Tea Party strikes again!
That's because she LOST the primary, you dumbass. She's running as a "write-in" candidate. You do know what that means don't you? It means that voters will have to write her name in if they wish to vote for her.
You liberals get dumber everyday.
I was reading up on this situation on the web. In Alaska, the law states they don't have to actually check the write in ballots unless there's a chance the write in is the winner, and after that it comes down to voter intent.
It's very likely that if Murkowski wins, the GOP will be sending armies of Lawyers to Alaska this year to challenge each and every misspelled ballot. That'll be tough for Murkowski to fight. You'll see a lot of calls for her to just give it up.
I'd like to see her win, but the idea that even if she does win she's facing an uphill legal battle to take her seat.... well it doesn't look good.
Murkowski has already proven that she is a fighter.
True, but to fight lawyers you need money. And if they'll make a case out of every single ballot, which they will do, that'll get pretty expensive.
She'll fight as long as she can, I'm just not holding my breath.
The only thing she is "fighting" is the perception she's really a Democrat.
The only thing she is "fighting" is the perception she's really a Democrat.
Really? I thought there was already one of those in the race?
Or is it just that she has some positions that you don't necessarily agree with and in your own sick twisted little world everyone in the Republican Party has to agree with you?
The only thing she is "fighting" is the perception she's really a Democrat.
Really? I thought there was already one of those in the race?
Or is it just that she has some positions that you don't necessarily agree with and in your own sick twisted little world everyone in the Republican Party has to agree with you?
Uh, no. The Democrat can't win, so the unions and all the other usual Democrat suspects are throwing in with Mirkuwskee.
I was reading up on this situation on the web. In Alaska, the law states they don't have to actually check the write in ballots unless there's a chance the write in is the winner, and after that it comes down to voter intent.
It's very likely that if Murkowski wins, the GOP will be sending armies of Lawyers to Alaska this year to challenge each and every misspelled ballot. That'll be tough for Murkowski to fight. You'll see a lot of calls for her to just give it up.
I'd like to see her win, but the idea that even if she does win she's facing an uphill legal battle to take her seat.... well it doesn't look good.
Murkowski has already proven that she is a fighter.
I was reading up on this situation on the web. In Alaska, the law states they don't have to actually check the write in ballots unless there's a chance the write in is the winner, and after that it comes down to voter intent.
It's very likely that if Murkowski wins, the GOP will be sending armies of Lawyers to Alaska this year to challenge each and every misspelled ballot. That'll be tough for Murkowski to fight. You'll see a lot of calls for her to just give it up.
I'd like to see her win, but the idea that even if she does win she's facing an uphill legal battle to take her seat.... well it doesn't look good.
Murkowski has already proven that she is a fighter.
No she's proved she's a sore loser. The people had a choice between her and Miller, the people chose Miller.
I was reading up on this situation on the web. In Alaska, the law states they don't have to actually check the write in ballots unless there's a chance the write in is the winner, and after that it comes down to voter intent.
It's very likely that if Murkowski wins, the GOP will be sending armies of Lawyers to Alaska this year to challenge each and every misspelled ballot. That'll be tough for Murkowski to fight. You'll see a lot of calls for her to just give it up.
I'd like to see her win, but the idea that even if she does win she's facing an uphill legal battle to take her seat.... well it doesn't look good.
Murkowski has already proven that she is a fighter.
No she's proved she's a sore loser. The people had a choice between her and Miller, the people chose Miller.
Murkowski has already proven that she is a fighter.
No she's proved she's a sore loser. The people had a choice between her and Miller, the people chose Miller.
and so she can't run as an independent or she's a sore loser?
Murkowski has already proven that she is a fighter.
No she's proved she's a sore loser. The people had a choice between her and Miller, the people chose Miller.
No, republicans had a choice about who they wanted to nominate.
Now "the people" have a choice between her, Miller, and the Democrat. It looks like Murkowski has a chance to be that choice.
Or did you forget that there were people other than republicans in Alaska?