Norman
Diamond Member
- Sep 24, 2010
- 31,254
- 15,196
- 1,590
she saw a way to get her name in the papers.Did you bother reading mine?
Yours was addressed in article.
It means that you’re in denial.
Yew don' reed reel gud dew ya.
He denied knowing her -- after admitting knowing her. She's got years of correspondence, another yearbook, and a graduation card. With Hannity he knew her (and described her as a "good girl" whatever that means) --- then in front of a campaign crowd he claimed he didn't know her (them) at all.
That sound honest to you?
Bullshit. He never denied knowing her or Deason. Moore only denied his accusers of sexual misconduct. Gibson is playing soap opera at this point in time. Moore is on record during the Hannity interview
It's on the record and we've already done this.
Roll tape.
>> In recent days Moore has backtracked, claiming at a campaign event last week, “The allegations are completely false. They are malicious. Specifically, I do not know any of these women.”
“Let me state once again: I do not know any of these women, did not date any of these women and have not engaged in any sexual misconduct with anyone,” he said again two days later. <<
That's why Gibson rolled out her various correspondence. In her words "he called me a liar". She even helped him campaign. Kept up with Christmas cards for years. Now suddenly --- amnesia.
So they're both on the record. On the Hannity record he knows them; on the campaign speech record he doesn't. Both cannot be true -- this is a one-or-zero. It's not a light switch, you gotta pick one.
It's much like you sit on a court bench and you know the law, and then when the law becomes inconvenient to your whim, suddenly you don't know the law, so you get kicked off.
You really think he remembers everyone who works for his campaign? There could be hundreds of people all over the state.
I wonder how much the woman got paid by the leftists.