ForeverYoung436
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 6,050
- 1,226
- 245
First of all it doesn't come from a Pamela Geller site, although I wouldn't be surprised if she carried it. It's a valid document designating the Mufti as the Nazi leader in the Middle East. Not that it needed to be reiterated. It's a historical fact. The rest of what you said is meaningless drivel. Case closed.
No it isn't. The document looks to have been doctored and refers to a document that no longer exists from 1936. Without seeing the content of the original document there is no way of determining the context, so it cannot be a valid source without corroboration.
This isn't a court of law. The Mufti was a genocidal Nazi, this is an indisputable historical fact. Squirm all you want it won't change a single thing.
No, it's an internet forum about politics. If the Mufti was a "genocidal Nazi", why did Zionist Israel leave him alone for decades, despite the fact that he lived just "next door" in Lebanon. Zionist Holocaust historiography devotes whole swathes of invective against the Mufti; second only to Hitler. Zionist Israel spent a lot of money, time and effort to capture Eichmann on the other side of the world, (who normally only gets a paragraph), why couldn't they bring the Mufti to trial like Eichmann?
He took refuge in a hostile Arab country, you moron. And then the dirtbag died. Lame excuse, try again, Achmed.
The Zionist IDF invaded Lebanon 3 times, in 1978, 1982 and 2006, so it's not beyond the realms of possibility he could have been snatched any time from 1959 until 1974, yet they didn't...why? He was only 70 miles away.
There was no invasion in 2006, as far as I know.