Importance of Collective Bargaining

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Leweman, Feb 24, 2011.

  1. Leweman
    Offline

    Leweman VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,653
    Likes Received:
    438
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +439 / 0 / -0
    Can someone explain to me why collective bargaining is so important for Governor Walker to get rid of. And if the Union is caving to the higher pension and healthcare costs why is collective bargaining important to them if they have to give up money anyway. The news has been throwing the word around all week but no one delves in to the specifics of what occurs in collective bargaining. If someone could tell me the pros and cons Id appreciate it.
  2. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Likes Received:
    5,590
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,591 / 0 / -0
    Get rid of collective bargaining and what have you really done?

    You have denied the workers the right of FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION.

    Basically outlawing unions is about equivalent to proposing that we also outlaw CORPORATIONS.

    After all, corporations (union or otherwise) require that people have the FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION to exist, too.

    Why did authoritarians like Hitler Mussolini SO HATE unions?

    Gee...I think you can probably connect THOSE dots on your own, right?
  3. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    72,068
    Likes Received:
    8,876
    Trophy Points:
    210
    Ratings:
    +9,129 / 103 / -0
    The collective bargaining has nothing to do with balancing the budget. It has no costs associated with it. The State has to AGREE with the union and sign a contract. It is mutual consent between two parties. If the state does not like the deal, they should not sign it

    What the Governor wants is to force the State workers to negotiate with one hand tied behind their backs. The State wants to enforce "my way or the highway" demands on workers. It is easier to do when you have to deal with them one on one
    • Like Like x 1
  4. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    62,064
    Likes Received:
    9,117
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +9,117 / 0 / -0
    The lie the DemonRats keep telling is that Walker wants to "get rid of collective bargaining" when in fact he wants to limit collective bargaining to salary only. The benefits will be removed from collective bargaining. Why? Cause that's what broke the bank.
  5. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    62,064
    Likes Received:
    9,117
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +9,117 / 0 / -0
    If the state can't come to an agreement what they should have is the freedom to is get it's workers from other sources. Someone needs to be at the table for the "taxpayer."


    Did you ever ask yourself why GM built an 800 million dollar plant in Mexico??? didyahuh? And that was after we bailed their asses out?? Ponder that.
  6. Nosmo King
    Offline

    Nosmo King VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    10,313
    Likes Received:
    1,610
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Buckle of the Rust Belt
    Ratings:
    +1,639 / 9 / -0
    Collective bargaining rights means the right to strike. If the whole work force strikes, the issue is resolved by negotiating (bargaining) with the collection of workers.

    Does anyone believe that workers should not have the right to protest working conditions or salary? Is it the Conservative position that workers should have no voice in their situations?
  7. Mini 14
    Offline

    Mini 14 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2010
    Messages:
    3,947
    Likes Received:
    570
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +570 / 0 / -0
    So if you don't join a union, you give up your right to walk away from a job, or complain about working conditions?

    Public unions are about to die, and it can't come fast enough.
  8. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    72,068
    Likes Received:
    8,876
    Trophy Points:
    210
    Ratings:
    +9,129 / 103 / -0
    $1 an hour wages
  9. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Likes Received:
    8,390
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,393 / 9 / -0
    Bureaucrats shouldn't....Even FDR recognized this.
  10. Nosmo King
    Offline

    Nosmo King VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    10,313
    Likes Received:
    1,610
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Buckle of the Rust Belt
    Ratings:
    +1,639 / 9 / -0
    No, you still have a right to walk away from a job. If you don't belong to a union, you have no right to change the conditions to something a little more fair.

    Conservatives want to eliminate the right to fairness in the workplace. And once again we see how Conservatives work hard to erode rights while they sit complacently when it comes to advocating rights. Why would any American opt for authoritarianism?
  11. Leweman
    Offline

    Leweman VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,653
    Likes Received:
    438
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +439 / 0 / -0
    So whats the limitations on unions then? Say the Union and Government discuss the wages and benefits and the Union doesnt like it. Then what?
  12. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Likes Received:
    8,390
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,393 / 9 / -0
    That almost never happens, as unions spend big money to assure that the people "bargaining" on behalf of guibmint are sympathetic.

    It's classic collusion...Little wonder liburls are all for it.
  13. Soggy in NOLA
    Offline

    Soggy in NOLA VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    22,167
    Likes Received:
    2,623
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Ratings:
    +2,645 / 4 / -0
    So.. let me get this straight... union rank and file pays dues, dues are used to bankroll one party's members', and then said party gets elected to public office and now "negotiates" with aforementioned union?

    This makes sense to you?
  14. noose4
    Offline

    noose4 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2009
    Messages:
    4,127
    Likes Received:
    610
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Hell's Kitchen N.Y.C.
    Ratings:
    +610 / 0 / -0


    Governor Walker wants to get rid of collective bargaining because it empowers the workers, workers that have the power to collectively bargain take a little piece of power from the powers that be. With collective bargaining in place concessions made during hard times can be regained in times of prosperity.

    If the civil service workers lose this fight I guarantee you the next target will be the private sector workers.
  15. noose4
    Offline

    noose4 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2009
    Messages:
    4,127
    Likes Received:
    610
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Hell's Kitchen N.Y.C.
    Ratings:
    +610 / 0 / -0

    No, Wall Street chicanery broke the bank.
  16. ba1614
    Offline

    ba1614 Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,812
    Likes Received:
    873
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Deep in the Northern Woods
    Ratings:
    +873 / 0 / -0
    That's what this is really about, public unions are the democratic party, without them the dems are really fucked. The more power the unions have, the more the dems have.

    How fucking arrogant are they to just throw away better than 200yrs of democracy to pout like petulant children? Seriously, this is a sad day.

    Hopefully the republicans don't shoot themselves in the foot, and just let the idiots keep exposing themselves for the arrogant fucks concerned only for those who think like them.
  17. ScreamingEagle
    Offline

    ScreamingEagle Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,794
    Likes Received:
    1,398
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,398 / 0 / -0
    The only "importance" of PUBLIC sector collective bargaining is so Democrats can make money from unions to promote their agendas...
  18. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    16,188
    Likes Received:
    1,562
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,607 / 1 / -0
    +1........the whole issue has to deal only with the life blood of the Democrat machine. All liberals ever whine about is the corruption on Wall Street. Obviously, a distraction. This scam is the public sector equal...........most people are just finding out about it now.
  19. NYcarbineer
    Offline

    NYcarbineer VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    45,678
    Likes Received:
    3,929
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +4,018 / 19 / -0
    Yeah, unions are so powerful. That's why the country is overrun with Americans making good wages in good union jobs.:lol:
    • Like Like x 1
  20. NYcarbineer
    Offline

    NYcarbineer VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    45,678
    Likes Received:
    3,929
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +4,018 / 19 / -0
    Scott Walker wasn't elected by the unions. Someone else bankrolled him.

Share This Page