Wiseacre
Retired USAF Chief
" Right now the republicans are saying CEOs will hire if we give them YET MORE tax cuts. "
Really? Who's saying that?
Really? Who's saying that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And this if for TM since she doesn't seem to even understand what supply side economics even refers to.
Supply-Side Economics: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty
Supply-side economics is also used to describe how changes in marginal tax rates influence economic activity. Supply-side economists believe that high marginal tax rates strongly discourage income, output, and the efficiency of resource use. In recent years, this latter use of the term has become the more common of the two and is thus the focus of this article.
from your link.
Right now the republicans are saying CEOs will hire if we give them YET MORE tax cuts.
Why would they hire without there being a demand fore their product?
the answer is they wouldnt.
They will only pocket the tax cuts until there is enough demand for them to warrent spending on more employees so they can make more proifit.
supply side doesnt work
So what does?
Are you recommending 100% tax rates on all corporate income and personal income over 250k per year?
And for the record, I am of the mindset that we need to raise taxes.
But, I would love to actually see a solution you have come up with.
Immie
This is truthmatters' version of being clever.
Supply-side economics is also used to describe how changes in marginal tax rates influence economic activity. Supply-side economists believe that high marginal tax rates strongly discourage income, output, and the efficiency of resource use. In recent years, this latter use of the term has become the more common of the two and is thus the focus of this article.
from your link.
Right now the republicans are saying CEOs will hire if we give them YET MORE tax cuts.
Why would they hire without there being a demand fore their product?
the answer is they wouldnt.
They will only pocket the tax cuts until there is enough demand for them to warrent spending on more employees so they can make more proifit.
supply side doesnt work
So what does?
Are you recommending 100% tax rates on all corporate income and personal income over 250k per year?
And for the record, I am of the mindset that we need to raise taxes.
But, I would love to actually see a solution you have come up with.
Immie
Damn! Did she run away again?
Immie
" Right now the republicans are saying CEOs will hire if we give them YET MORE tax cuts. "
Really? Who's saying that?
And this if for TM since she doesn't seem to even understand what supply side economics even refers to.
Supply-Side Economics: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty
Supply-side economics is also used to describe how changes in marginal tax rates influence economic activity. Supply-side economists believe that high marginal tax rates strongly discourage income, output, and the efficiency of resource use. In recent years, this latter use of the term has become the more common of the two and is thus the focus of this article.
"from your link.
Right now the republicans are saying CEOs will hire if we give them YET MORE tax cuts.
Why would they hire without there being a demand fore their product?
the answer is they wouldnt.
They will only pocket the tax cuts until there is enough demand for them to warrent spending on more employees so they can make more proifit.
supply side doesnt work
The main focus of Republicans is not cutting taxes...it's not RAISING them. People like you, Truth are oblivious to the fact that even liberal economists like Christina Romer are declaring that increasing taxes on anyone at this point of the recovery would be bad fiscal policy.
Republicans are trying to do things that will stimulate job creation. President Obama is looking for tax increases. He's once again proving himself to be clueless when it comes to economics.
I think that one makes sense and that the other doesnt.
can you guess which one would fail and leave me in debt?
Oh..so you weren't serious.
Instead..you wanted to pull a gotcha. That's basically why you are not well liked around here.
Truth? You do truth with a lie.
And that's bullshit.
By the way...your supply side economics thing was wrong in terms of a business model.
Pet Rock - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nobody "naturally" needs to buy rocks.
I was hoping to get some feedback from yoiu guys on what would be the more succesful business plan.
I was thinking of producing a certain product in mass quanities with a hope that the result would be because there is mass quantities people would just natrually buy the product.
My alternative plan was to offer a product in a test manner to see what the market wanted and what people would buy.
Which aaproach do you think will result in a more sustainable business?
supply side economics is insane
Solar panel technology is lucrative...
Oh, wait...
Nevermind...
I think that one makes sense and that the other doesnt.
can you guess which one would fail and leave me in debt?
Oh..so you weren't serious.
Instead..you wanted to pull a gotcha. That's basically why you are not well liked around here.
Truth? You do truth with a lie.
And that's bullshit.
By the way...your supply side economics thing was wrong in terms of a business model.
Pet Rock - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nobody "naturally" needs to buy rocks.
I think that one makes sense and that the other doesnt.
can you guess which one would fail and leave me in debt?
Oh..so you weren't serious.
Instead..you wanted to pull a gotcha. That's basically why you are not well liked around here.
Truth? You do truth with a lie.
And that's bullshit.
By the way...your supply side economics thing was wrong in terms of a business model.
Pet Rock - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nobody "naturally" needs to buy rocks.
Did they buy it because there was alot of them or because it was a great new gag gift?
BTW the producer of that product did NOT produce millions and then hope they sold.
they upped production with demand
Did they buy it because there was alot of them or because it was a great new gag gift?
To the extend that their quantity was able to produce each unit at a lower cost - yes.
Of course they did. Millions is an awful lot to produce all at once.BTW the producer of that product did NOT produce millions and then hope they sold.
they upped production with demand
Go with your alternative plan. Mass producing shit on a stick won't create a demand for shit on a stick. You have to produce a product people actually want.
Honestly, I'm a little surprised that you want to jump on the evil capitalist bandwagon and exploit the little people.
Thank you for going on record that supply side economics is bullshit
Can you give us a list of companies that started up by mass producing a product expecting it to create a demand? Methinks you are bending your "facts" just a wee bit.
For Pete's sake people - you don't recognize a troll thread when you see one?
...I mean after you stopped laughing at the thought of TM owning a business.
Oh come on.
I want to out their historically failed ideas.
Im not here to be popular Im here to exchange facts.
i have a long list of friends here BTW
SSSOOOOLLLLYYYNNNNDDDRRRRAAAA
Now there is some FAILED ideas and stimulus for ya.
My god you are annoying