Illegals In Mexico Begin Hunger Stike - 'We Are Fighting For 'OUR RIGHTS'?!

[Slyhunter]

But don't these progressive democrat buzzwords and clauses simply mean that you find money for centralized programs by shaking it down on working people? So how w do you generate revenue from a border policy without tagging the caravans? You will just put more obligations to regular border crossing traffic, when people are already losing money on everything. I don't see how this would ever work.

We end our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Commerce, well regulated.

There must be a capital way.

You mean soviet style again? That has never worked. But yes it would end the immigration problem, because it would make the USA poorer than Honduras.

Capitalism; What is that, sayeth the Right Wing.

I don't usually use the word capitalism. I think most people use it as the opposite of socialism.

We should be promoting the general welfare every time we have any problems. We have a general welfare clause and a commerce clause. We should be generating revenue from public policies whenever possible.

Can't generate revenues from those who ain't got any. They are the bottom of the barrel come to suck from the Governments teat. They need to go back home and fix their own damn country.

 

[danielpalos]

We end our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Commerce, well regulated.

There must be a capital way.

You mean soviet style again? That has never worked. But yes it would end the immigration problem, because it would make the USA poorer than Honduras.

Capitalism; What is that, sayeth the Right Wing.

I don't usually use the word capitalism. I think most people use it as the opposite of socialism.

We should be promoting the general welfare every time we have any problems. We have a general welfare clause and a commerce clause. We should be generating revenue from public policies whenever possible.

Can't generate revenues from those who ain't got any. They are the bottom of the barrel come to suck from the Governments teat. They need to go back home and fix their own damn country.

Upgrading infrastructure is still the best option for people who can. We have to process asylum seekers for natural rights purposes. Most would rather have a market friendly way to stay in the US for years at a time; and, then be able to "go home" and "set up shop" over there with the stuff they may have purchased, over here.

 

[anotherlife]

But don't these progressive democrat buzzwords and clauses simply mean that you find money for centralized programs by shaking it down on working people? So how w do you generate revenue from a border policy without tagging the caravans? You will just put more obligations to regular border crossing traffic, when people are already losing money on everything. I don't see how this would ever work.

We end our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Commerce, well regulated.

There must be a capital way.

You mean soviet style again? That has never worked. But yes it would end the immigration problem, because it would make the USA poorer than Honduras.

Capitalism; What is that, sayeth the Right Wing.

I don't usually use the word capitalism. I think most people use it as the opposite of socialism.

We should be promoting the general welfare every time we have any problems. We have a general welfare clause and a commerce clause. We should be generating revenue from public policies whenever possible.

That sounds 100 % Soviet. What public policies do you have in mind?

 

[anotherlife]

You mean soviet style again? That has never worked. But yes it would end the immigration problem, because it would make the USA poorer than Honduras.

Capitalism; What is that, sayeth the Right Wing.

I don't usually use the word capitalism. I think most people use it as the opposite of socialism.

We should be promoting the general welfare every time we have any problems. We have a general welfare clause and a commerce clause. We should be generating revenue from public policies whenever possible.

Can't generate revenues from those who ain't got any. They are the bottom of the barrel come to suck from the Governments teat. They need to go back home and fix their own damn country.

Upgrading infrastructure is still the best option for people who can. We have to process asylum seekers for natural rights purposes. Most would rather have a market friendly way to stay in the US for years at a time; and, then be able to "go home" and "set up shop" over there with the stuff they may have purchased, over here.

So putting money in the pockets of insider contractors is the solution? Interesting.

 

[danielpalos]

We end our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Commerce, well regulated.

There must be a capital way.

You mean soviet style again? That has never worked. But yes it would end the immigration problem, because it would make the USA poorer than Honduras.

Capitalism; What is that, sayeth the Right Wing.

I don't usually use the word capitalism. I think most people use it as the opposite of socialism.

We should be promoting the general welfare every time we have any problems. We have a general welfare clause and a commerce clause. We should be generating revenue from public policies whenever possible.

That sounds 100 % Soviet. What public policies do you have in mind?

in right wing fantasy? a wall is "Soviet". any questions.

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalism; What is that, sayeth the Right Wing.

I don't usually use the word capitalism. I think most people use it as the opposite of socialism.

We should be promoting the general welfare every time we have any problems. We have a general welfare clause and a commerce clause. We should be generating revenue from public policies whenever possible.

Can't generate revenues from those who ain't got any. They are the bottom of the barrel come to suck from the Governments teat. They need to go back home and fix their own damn country.

Upgrading infrastructure is still the best option for people who can. We have to process asylum seekers for natural rights purposes. Most would rather have a market friendly way to stay in the US for years at a time; and, then be able to "go home" and "set up shop" over there with the stuff they may have purchased, over here.

So putting money in the pockets of insider contractors is the solution? Interesting.

We should be manufacturing manufacturing jobs. Upgrading infrastructure whenever possible is one way to do that.

 

[anotherlife]

You mean soviet style again? That has never worked. But yes it would end the immigration problem, because it would make the USA poorer than Honduras.

Capitalism; What is that, sayeth the Right Wing.

I don't usually use the word capitalism. I think most people use it as the opposite of socialism.

We should be promoting the general welfare every time we have any problems. We have a general welfare clause and a commerce clause. We should be generating revenue from public policies whenever possible.

That sounds 100 % Soviet. What public policies do you have in mind?

in right wing fantasy? a wall is "Soviet". any questions.

When the government will start delaying or rejecting people's passport applications, then you will see how much Soviet it is.

 

[anotherlife]

I don't usually use the word capitalism. I think most people use it as the opposite of socialism.

We should be promoting the general welfare every time we have any problems. We have a general welfare clause and a commerce clause. We should be generating revenue from public policies whenever possible.

Can't generate revenues from those who ain't got any. They are the bottom of the barrel come to suck from the Governments teat. They need to go back home and fix their own damn country.

Upgrading infrastructure is still the best option for people who can. We have to process asylum seekers for natural rights purposes. Most would rather have a market friendly way to stay in the US for years at a time; and, then be able to "go home" and "set up shop" over there with the stuff they may have purchased, over here.

So putting money in the pockets of insider contractors is the solution? Interesting.

We should be manufacturing manufacturing jobs. Upgrading infrastructure whenever possible is one way to do that.

Dollar valuations prevent that. Also centralized government prevents that.

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalism; What is that, sayeth the Right Wing.

I don't usually use the word capitalism. I think most people use it as the opposite of socialism.

We should be promoting the general welfare every time we have any problems. We have a general welfare clause and a commerce clause. We should be generating revenue from public policies whenever possible.

That sounds 100 % Soviet. What public policies do you have in mind?

in right wing fantasy? a wall is "Soviet". any questions.

When the government will start delaying or rejecting people's passport applications, then you will see how much Soviet it is.

This is our supreme law of the land: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

 

[danielpalos]

We should be promoting the general welfare every time we have any problems. We have a general welfare clause and a commerce clause. We should be generating revenue from public policies whenever possible.

Can't generate revenues from those who ain't got any. They are the bottom of the barrel come to suck from the Governments teat. They need to go back home and fix their own damn country.

Upgrading infrastructure is still the best option for people who can. We have to process asylum seekers for natural rights purposes. Most would rather have a market friendly way to stay in the US for years at a time; and, then be able to "go home" and "set up shop" over there with the stuff they may have purchased, over here.

So putting money in the pockets of insider contractors is the solution? Interesting.

We should be manufacturing manufacturing jobs. Upgrading infrastructure whenever possible is one way to do that.

Dollar valuations prevent that. Also centralized government prevents that.

Dollar valuations prevent a wall. So does centralized government.

 

[anotherlife]

I don't usually use the word capitalism. I think most people use it as the opposite of socialism.

We should be promoting the general welfare every time we have any problems. We have a general welfare clause and a commerce clause. We should be generating revenue from public policies whenever possible.

That sounds 100 % Soviet. What public policies do you have in mind?

in right wing fantasy? a wall is "Soviet". any questions.

When the government will start delaying or rejecting people's passport applications, then you will see how much Soviet it is.

This is our supreme law of the land: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

No it is not in the constitution. Also it was only in the late 1980's or 1990's when the state specific naturalization laws were unified into a federal naturalization law.

 

[danielpalos]

We should be promoting the general welfare every time we have any problems. We have a general welfare clause and a commerce clause. We should be generating revenue from public policies whenever possible.

That sounds 100 % Soviet. What public policies do you have in mind?

in right wing fantasy? a wall is "Soviet". any questions.

When the government will start delaying or rejecting people's passport applications, then you will see how much Soviet it is.

This is our supreme law of the land: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

No it is not in the constitution. Also it was only in the late 1980's or 1990's when the state specific naturalization laws were unified into a federal naturalization law.

Yes, it is. You are on the right wing; you have no "gospel Truth".

 

[anotherlife]

Can't generate revenues from those who ain't got any. They are the bottom of the barrel come to suck from the Governments teat. They need to go back home and fix their own damn country.

Upgrading infrastructure is still the best option for people who can. We have to process asylum seekers for natural rights purposes. Most would rather have a market friendly way to stay in the US for years at a time; and, then be able to "go home" and "set up shop" over there with the stuff they may have purchased, over here.

So putting money in the pockets of insider contractors is the solution? Interesting.

We should be manufacturing manufacturing jobs. Upgrading infrastructure whenever possible is one way to do that.

Dollar valuations prevent that. Also centralized government prevents that.

Dollar valuations prevent a wall. So does centralized government.

You can not build a wall tall enough to balance a $7.50(?) per hour minimum wage country against a less than a dollar a day crowd.

 

[anotherlife]

That sounds 100 % Soviet. What public policies do you have in mind?

in right wing fantasy? a wall is "Soviet". any questions.

When the government will start delaying or rejecting people's passport applications, then you will see how much Soviet it is.

This is our supreme law of the land: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

No it is not in the constitution. Also it was only in the late 1980's or 1990's when the state specific naturalization laws were unified into a federal naturalization law.

Yes, it is. You are on the right wing; you have no "gospel Truth".

So where is that in the constitution then?

 

[danielpalos]

Upgrading infrastructure is still the best option for people who can. We have to process asylum seekers for natural rights purposes. Most would rather have a market friendly way to stay in the US for years at a time; and, then be able to "go home" and "set up shop" over there with the stuff they may have purchased, over here.

So putting money in the pockets of insider contractors is the solution? Interesting.

We should be manufacturing manufacturing jobs. Upgrading infrastructure whenever possible is one way to do that.

Dollar valuations prevent that. Also centralized government prevents that.

Dollar valuations prevent a wall. So does centralized government.

You can not build a wall tall enough to balance a $7.50(?) per hour minimum wage country against a less than a dollar a day crowd.

We are raising the minimum wage to raise more tax revenue.

 

[danielpalos]

in right wing fantasy? a wall is "Soviet". any questions.

When the government will start delaying or rejecting people's passport applications, then you will see how much Soviet it is.

This is our supreme law of the land: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

No it is not in the constitution. Also it was only in the late 1980's or 1990's when the state specific naturalization laws were unified into a federal naturalization law.

Yes, it is. You are on the right wing; you have no "gospel Truth".

So where is that in the constitution then?

Where it is supposed to be.

 

[anotherlife]

So putting money in the pockets of insider contractors is the solution? Interesting.

We should be manufacturing manufacturing jobs. Upgrading infrastructure whenever possible is one way to do that.

Dollar valuations prevent that. Also centralized government prevents that.

Dollar valuations prevent a wall. So does centralized government.

You can not build a wall tall enough to balance a $7.50(?) per hour minimum wage country against a less than a dollar a day crowd.

We are raising the minimum wage to raise more tax revenue.

That is just dog chasing its tail.

By the way, taxes are stupid because you need exports to create a tax base, but you can't tax exports but only working households. Therein stands the foundamentally futile and predatory nature of all taxes.

 

[anotherlife]

When the government will start delaying or rejecting people's passport applications, then you will see how much Soviet it is.

This is our supreme law of the land: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

No it is not in the constitution. Also it was only in the late 1980's or 1990's when the state specific naturalization laws were unified into a federal naturalization law.

Yes, it is. You are on the right wing; you have no "gospel Truth".

So where is that in the constitution then?

Where it is supposed to be.

So you have answered your own question. Nowhere indeed, because it is not in the constitution. It doesn't need to be in the constitution either, or anywhere, because it is unnecessary and meaningless.

 

[danielpalos]

We should be manufacturing manufacturing jobs. Upgrading infrastructure whenever possible is one way to do that.

Dollar valuations prevent that. Also centralized government prevents that.

Dollar valuations prevent a wall. So does centralized government.

You can not build a wall tall enough to balance a $7.50(?) per hour minimum wage country against a less than a dollar a day crowd.

We are raising the minimum wage to raise more tax revenue.

That is just dog chasing its tail.

By the way, taxes are stupid because you need exports to create a tax base, but you can't tax exports but only working households. Therein stands the foundamentally futile and predatory nature of all taxes.

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.

higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

 

[danielpalos]

This is our supreme law of the land: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

No it is not in the constitution. Also it was only in the late 1980's or 1990's when the state specific naturalization laws were unified into a federal naturalization law.

Yes, it is. You are on the right wing; you have no "gospel Truth".

So where is that in the constitution then?

Where it is supposed to be.

So you have answered your own question. Nowhere indeed, because it is not in the constitution. It doesn't need to be in the constitution either, or anywhere, because it is unnecessary and meaningless.

There is no appeal to ignorance of the law. Where do you think the powers are listed in our Constitution?