Illegal immigrants: I deserve free health, give it to me NOW

" US Citizens Set Laws And Policy "

* Red Herring Focus On Legal Immigration System Providence *

Show us this right wing fantasy of any form of clause over the whole and entire concept of Immigration.
We should have no illegal problem or illegal underclass with an uniform rule of naturalization. We should be "making money on foreign nationals in the US not losing money." What is wrong, right wingers. Prefer your Expensive socialism on a national basis to Commerce well regulated? Why only soo much right wing support for Capitalism, in Socialism threads?
Are you diverting from " Obey the law . " as it applies to jus sanguinin being applied to award citizenship to children of " non jurisdiction " migrants ?

The conjectures for " making money " are not just pie in the sky dreams and is subject to both debits and credits , both gains and losses , depending upon circumstances .

The us legal immigration system includes a caveat in the visa agreement that an individual is not traveling to the us with the intended purpose of delivering a child to become a us citizen .

Sew , why in hell should citizens expect to set aside that expectation of compliance for " non jurisdiction " migrants , when the process of legal and permanent immigration requires proof of self sufficiency ?

This is the supreme Law of our Republic land on that matter:
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,
Obey the Law, right right wingers. We need a better solution at lower cost. We should be Making money not Losing money on foreign nationals in the US.
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
 
" A Fee To Get A Clue "

* Baffling Expectation From Vacuous Populism *

Why only soo much right wing support for Capitalism, in Socialism threads?
The means and extremes paradigm , or the golden means paradigm , or the golden ratio paradigm , idealistically expects that any two extremes may be modeled and analyzed according to the scheme of antonyms .

Consider a scheme where authoritarianism and libertarianism are logical antonyms , where authoritarianism is consistent with prescriptions of law asserting aggression by a state , which are laws written as positive wrights , and where libertarianism is consistent with proscriptions of law forbidding aggression by a state , which are laws written as negative wrights .

Consider ascribing the concept of individualism ( I ) with the extreme of libertarianism ( L ) which does not expect interference by aggression through governance of a state or from other individuals , save a rule of non violence law .

Consider ascribing the concept of communalism ( C ) with the extremes of authoritarianism ( A ) , which does expect interference by aggression through governance of a state and from other individuals , save a rule of non violence law .

Another analogy would relate statism ( S ) with the extremes of authoritarianism ( A ) which does expect interference by aggression through governance of a state and from other individuals , save a rule of non violence law .

The golden relation applied indicates that the natural aesthetic means of individualism ( *i , *l ) and communalism / statistism ( *c , *s , *a ) exist between the extremes ( L , I ) and ( A , C , S ) .

I__________*i_______*s__________S , I___________*i_______*c__________C

Thus those aspiring communism have optioned authoritarianism towards the natural mean of communalism ( *c ) , whereas those aspiring capitalism have optioned libertarianism towards the natural mean of individualism ( *i ) .

* Where Is Socialism *

There is a difference between communal social systems that are state managed and collective social system that are privately managed , though both are intermingled within the concept of state capitalism .


* Meets Where Linear Area Metes *


327px-Odom.svg.png
330px-Pentagram-phi.svg.png


375px-Mathematical_Pyramid.svg.png
330px-Golden_triangle_%28math%29.svg.png
A central bank and a commerce clause; why eschew Capitalism right wingers?
 
" What Of It With Or Without Says Hue Manipulating Currency Value To Remain Competetive "

* Every Thing Elicits A Contest Of Perspective Views Sometimes Supporting /\ \/ Opposing *


A central bank and a commerce clause; why eschew Capitalism right wingers?
A central bank would control and validate national currency .

If proposing to follow American School (economics) - Wikipedia , tariffs on imports and tax incentives for domestic production are occurring without a necessity for a us central bank , and are being applied in a manner useful for us advantages .

What is the left contest with the strump administration , assuming the administration is leveraging such us interest tactics against chinese manufacturing to promote us domestic development of those industries and return those means and roles of employment ?

A us central bank as a national device for state capitalism in pursuit of national prosperity through neomercantilism is different from a collective bank where a collective of private citizens manages the banking system monitored by government commission that sets parameters and policies to abate improprieties and establish the validity of commerce transactions .

A free market for capitalism does not prevent nations with a central bank from engaging in neomercantilism , as a central bank is a device for leveraging national currency in markets to eschew that production and consumption of useful commodities in demand increase domestically .
 
Last edited:
" What Of It With Or Without Says Hue Manipulating Currency Value To Remain Competetive "

* Every Thing Elicits A Contest Of Perspective Views Sometimes Supporting /\ \/ Opposing *


A central bank and a commerce clause; why eschew Capitalism right wingers?
A central bank would control and validate national currency .

If proposing to follow American School (economics) - Wikipedia , tariffs on imports and tax incentives for domestic production are occurring without a necessity for a us central bank , and are being applied in a manner useful for us advantages .

What is the left contest with the strump administration , assuming the administration is leveraging such us interest tactics against chinese manufacturing to promote us domestic development of those industries and return those means and roles of employment ?

A us central bank as a national device for state capitalism in pursuit of national prosperity through neomercantilism is different from a collective bank where a collective of private citizens manages the banking system monitored by government commission that sets parameters and policies to abate improprieties and establish the validity of commerce transactions .

A free market for capitalism does not prevent nations with a central bank from engaging in neomercantilism , as a central bank is a device for leveraging national currency in markets to eschew that production and consumption of useful commodities in demand increase domestically .
We should not be losing money with a naturalization clause.
 
The right wing Only alleges to care about natural rights in Abortion threads where they get to tell Women what to do with their own bodies.

So much for Individual Liberty or reducing Government regulations.

Why do they want to be taken seriously regarding morals?
I see what your saying. A woman can whore around then just kill it if she gets knocked up Makes sense to some moral-less, godless, whore.
 
The right wing Only alleges to care about natural rights in Abortion threads where they get to tell Women what to do with their own bodies.

So much for Individual Liberty or reducing Government regulations.

Why do they want to be taken seriously regarding morals?
I see what your saying. A woman can whore around then just kill it if she gets knocked up Makes sense to some moral-less, godless, whore.
Only the right wing has a problem with an ounce of prevention and still complain about a pound of cure. And, if women believed more in Equality, they would goad you to come on over and get, "slutified" just to see for themselves if You are a practitioner of the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God), or not.
 
the impostor in the White House has spent the last four years doubling down on demonizing Latinos

he's the one who doesn't belong in America, not immigrants
 
" La Raza Ranting Eight Hundred Million Breeding Into Poverty Is No Enough "

* Illegitimate Implementation Of US Constitution Is Provoking Antagonism *

the impostor in the White House has spent the last four years doubling down on demonizing Latinos
he's the one who doesn't belong in America, not immigrants
In case you have not noticed the issue is with non jurisdiction sojourners ( aka illegal migrants ) and not with jurisdiction sojourners ( aka legal migrants ) .

The us citizen has a legal immigration system by which it determines fitness and self sufficiency of migrants and that includes caveats in visas stipulating that individuals are not traveling to the us with the purpose of delivering a child to be a us citizen and the us also stops women from entering the country when it is obvious they are traveling for birth tourism .

The children of non jurisdiction sojourners , even those born in the us , are not entitled to us citizenship by jus soli and are to be given jus sanginin citizenship of their mother .

The country from which the non jurisdiction sojourner originates should be billed for delivery of birth or for any social subsistence incurred due to the use of us health care system .
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top