Illegal Immigrant on Terror Watch List Released by Border Patrol, Spends a Year in the U.S.

[Hollie]

Where did I say that? If our principle is that we were fighting for freedom and democracy, then we shouldn't have been backing guys like Pinochet and the Shah because the people MIGHT pick a form of government we don't like.



What the fuck are you babbling about? Did the Chatbot program get confused again?



You are a tad confused. Russia got into the war before we did. We BEGGED the Russians to intervene in our war with Japan.


The Jews run our foreign policy. We should probably do something about that. It really wasn't our business between Kuwait and Iraq, but the Jews wanted to take out Saddam so off we went. Screw those guys who got Iraq War Syndrome.

On the other hand, we did pick guys like Churchill and Syngman Rhee. You have this quaint view that politics and diplomacy are strictly about a narrow worldview.

Oh dear, Chatbot. Are you angry that I addressed your insensate Jew hatreds? You shouldn’t be. When you launch into your typical Jew tirades, you do tend to go off the deep end.

I never addressed the timing of the Russians entering the war. That has nothing to do with my earlier comment about alliances being a function of mutually beneficial relationships as a part of diplomacy.

Oh, dear. There you go again with another Jew tirade. It’s a shame that you spend so much time consumed by “The Jews”.

 

[JoeB131]

On the other hand, we did pick guys like Churchill and Syngman Rhee. You have this quaint view that politics and diplomacy are strictly about a narrow worldview.

”.

Churchill was a bastard. He let 3 million Bengalis starve to death during the war. Syngman Rhee... also kind of a bastard.

If this is the best you got, we should probably just put you back on ignore, you really add nothing to the conversation.

 

[Hollie]

Churchill was a bastard. He let 3 million Bengalis starve to death during the war. Syngman Rhee... also kind of a bastard.

If this is the best you got, we should probably just put you back on ignore, you really add nothing to the conversation.

I’m sure you don’t understand the events surrounding your phony claim that Churchill starved Bengal. I’m sure you can’t offer anything to support your claim,

Syngman Rhee... also kind of a bastard.

All just a function of your lack of understanding history.

Maybe you should make the argument that Churchill and Rhee were Jews.

 

[JoeB131]

I’m sure you don’t understand the events surrounding your phony claim that Churchill starved Bengal. I’m sure you can’t offer anything to support your claim,

Churchill's policies contributed to 1943 Bengal famine â study

Study is first time weather data has been used argue wartime policies exacerbated famine

www.theguardian.com

However, the 1943 famine in Bengal, which killed up to 3 million people, was different, according to the researchers. Though the eastern Indian region was affected by drought for much of the 1940s, conditions were worst in 1941, years before the most extreme stage of the famine, when newspapers began to publish images of the dying on the streets of Kolkata, then named Calcutta, against the wishes of the colonial British administration.

More recent studies, including those by the journalist Madhushree Mukerjee, have argued the famine was exacerbated by the decisions of Winston Churchill’s wartime cabinet in London.

Mukerjee has presented evidence the cabinet was warned repeatedly that the exhaustive use of Indian resources for the war effort could result in famine, but it opted to continue exporting rice from India to elsewhere in the empire.

Rice stocks continued to leave India even as London was denying urgent requests from India’s viceroy for more than 1m tonnes of emergency wheat supplies in 1942-43. Churchill has been quoted as blaming the famine on the fact Indians were “breeding like rabbits”, and asking how, if the shortages were so bad, Mahatma Gandhi was still alive.


The man was truly as fucking evil as Hitler and Stalin.

 

[Hollie]

Churchill's policies contributed to 1943 Bengal famine â study

Study is first time weather data has been used argue wartime policies exacerbated famine

www.theguardian.com

However, the 1943 famine in Bengal, which killed up to 3 million people, was different, according to the researchers. Though the eastern Indian region was affected by drought for much of the 1940s, conditions were worst in 1941, years before the most extreme stage of the famine, when newspapers began to publish images of the dying on the streets of Kolkata, then named Calcutta, against the wishes of the colonial British administration.

More recent studies, including those by the journalist Madhushree Mukerjee, have argued the famine was exacerbated by the decisions of Winston Churchill’s wartime cabinet in London.

Mukerjee has presented evidence the cabinet was warned repeatedly that the exhaustive use of Indian resources for the war effort could result in famine, but it opted to continue exporting rice from India to elsewhere in the empire.

Rice stocks continued to leave India even as London was denying urgent requests from India’s viceroy for more than 1m tonnes of emergency wheat supplies in 1942-43. Churchill has been quoted as blaming the famine on the fact Indians were “breeding like rabbits”, and asking how, if the shortages were so bad, Mahatma Gandhi was still alive.


The man was truly as fucking evil as Hitler and Stalin.

You poor, dear.

Did Churchill cause the Bengal Famine of 1943, as has been claimed?

There’s been much heated debate about Churchill’s alleged culpability in the deaths of thousands of Indians during the Bengal Famine of 1943. Some say he denied vital food supplies to […]

winstonchurchill.org

​

There’s been much heated debate about Churchill’s alleged culpability in the deaths of thousands of Indians during the Bengal Famine of 1943. Some say he denied vital food supplies to India at a time when lives could have been saved, diverting these to Allies in the Mediterranean instead, while others say food was no scarcer in Bengal in ’43 than in ’41 (when there was no famine); that hoarding, declining wages, unemployment, rising food prices and poor food-distribution systems all contributed to the deaths. Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen, historian Mark Tauger and science journalist Madhusree Mukerjee have all entered the debate recently and the findings are inconclusive.

 

[JoeB131]

You poor, dear.

Did Churchill cause the Bengal Famine of 1943, as has been claimed?

There’s been much heated debate about Churchill’s alleged culpability in the deaths of thousands of Indians during the Bengal Famine of 1943. Some say he denied vital food supplies to […]

winstonchurchill.org

​

There’s been much heated debate about Churchill’s alleged culpability in the deaths of thousands of Indians during the Bengal Famine of 1943. Some say he denied vital food supplies to India at a time when lives could have been saved, diverting these to Allies in the Mediterranean instead, while others say food was no scarcer in Bengal in ’43 than in ’41 (when there was no famine); that hoarding, declining wages, unemployment, rising food prices and poor food-distribution systems all contributed to the deaths. Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen, historian Mark Tauger and science journalist Madhusree Mukerjee have all entered the debate recently and the findings are inconclusive.

Right, you only get blamed for a Famine killing people if you are Mao or Stalin.
It's not like Churchill was starving white people, amiright?

 

[Hollie]

Right, you only get blamed for a Famine killing people if you are Mao or Stalin.
It's not like Churchill was starving white people, amiright?

You made no credible case for any famine as a direct result of Churchill’s actions.

It’s just like you need to promote your self-loathing whiteness.

 

[JoeB131]

You made no credible case for any famine as a direct result of Churchill’s actions.

Yes, I did.

Back on ignore you go