IIPC in embarassing backdown

Saigon

Gold Member
May 4, 2012
11,434
882
175
Helsinki, Finland
I suggest you read this article quite carefully...

"Chris Smith: For those who are keen observers of what the global warming mob is up to, and have a healthy cynicism about what the doomsayers suggest, you’ll be very pleased to know the world is not heading for disaster, at least not as quickly as they say.

— 2GB, Breakfast Show with Chris Smith, 16th September, 2013"

Hello I’m Paul Barry, welcome to Media Watch, and great news for anyone concerned about global warming.

And even better news for shock jocks like Chris Smith who doesn't think we have much to worry about.

Yes it’s official at last ... those stupid scientists on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change got it wrong

"Chris Smith: ... in what amounts to the most embarrassing self-assessment in world science, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has basically fessed up. It’s admitted that its computer drastically overestimated rising temperatures. Wouldn’t you know it, eh? ...

Instead of warming at a rate of .2 degrees Celsius per decade, which was always a total con, we’ve only warmed .1 of a degree per decade since 1951.

— 2GB, Breakfast Show with Chris Smith, 16th September, 2013"

Well, that’s a relief. And how do we know it’s true?

Because Chris Smith read it on the front page of last Monday’s Australian newspaper.

And when it comes to rubbishing the dangers of man-made global warming the shock jocks certainly know who we can trust.


"The Australian

Graham Lloyd Environment Editor

We got it wrong on warming, says IPCC

— 2GB, The Australian, 16th September, 2013"

As the Australian revealed , the world’s climate experts had got their figures terribly wrong.

In a leaked final draft of their latest climate report, due out later this week, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change or IPCC was set to admit:


"... its computer drastically overestimated rising temperatures, and over the past 60 years the world has in fact been warming at half the rate claimed in the previous IPCC report in 2007.

— 2GB, The Australian, 16th September, 2013"

Ah. That damn computer. It’s been giving so much trouble.

Not surprisingly, the boffins were running for cover and getting ready for the fall out.

Although of course they would not admit it.


"Last week the IPCC was forced to deny it was locked in crisis talks ...

— 2GB, The Australian, 16th September, 2013"

Graham Lloyd hadn’t apparently seen the leaked IPCC report, but he really didn’t need to.

Because he’d read all about it the previous day in Britain’s raucous Mail on Sunday .


"THE GREAT GREEN CON

World’s top climate scientists confess: global warming is half what we said.

— 2GB, The Mail on Sunday (UK), 15th September, 2013"

As the Mail revealed, it was an ‘astonishing new admission’, a ‘staggering mixture of confusion and ignorance’ and a ‘massive cut in the speed of global warming’.

But there was one small problem. It wasn’t the scientists who got their figures wrong. It was the Mail on Sunday.

And the Australian had simply repeated the mistake, as one of Australia’s most eminent climate scientists, Professor David Karoly, who had read the report— immediately pointed out .


"Today's Australian newspaper has major errors in its front page article with headline "We got it wrong on warming, says the IPCC".

I look forward to The Australian publishing a correction or a new article with my headline above.

“THE AUSTRALIAN GETS IT WRONG ON GLOBAL WARMING AGAIN”

— Media Release: Australian Science Media Centre, David Karoly, Professor of Atmospheric Science, University of Melbourne,
16th September, 2013"

That same morning, another Australian climate expert added caustically:


"The Australian article ... demonstrates the inherent dangers in sourcing scientific information from a UK tabloid rather than climate scientists ...

— Media Release: Australian Science Media Centre, John Cook, Research Fellow, Global Change Institute University of Queensland, 16th September, 2013"

So what exactly was the mistake? Well, the Mail on Sunday had maintained, and the Australian repeated, this basic claim:


"The 2007 assessment report said the planet was warming at a rate of 0.2C every decade, but ... the draft update report says the true figure since 1951 has been 0.12C.

— 2GB, The Australian, 16th September, 2013"

Ipso facto, the claimed rate of global warming had roughly halved.

The only problem was the Mail had compared apples with oranges.

Matching a period of 15 years from 1990, with another of 60 years from 1951.

IF you compared apples with apples and took the long-term periods from each report there was virtually no change ... and certainly no embarrassing retreat.

Read the long-term observed trend of 0.13C from the IPCC's 2007 report

Prof Karoly told the Australian he would complain to the Press Council.

And after the Mail on Sunday corrected its story we asked why the Oz had not followed suit.

Whereupon—to its credit— it did just that


"CORRECTION:
A report in The Australian on Monday ... said the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had dramatically revised down the rate of global warming over the past 60 years. In fact, the new rate of 0.12C every decade is almost the same as the IPCC’s 2007 figure of 0.13C every decade over the 50 years to 2005.

— The Weekend Australian, 21st September, 2013"

But by this time the airwaves were abuzz with the smug sound of shock jocks saying they told us so.

On Brisbane’s 4BC and Sydney’s 2GB the story got a run at least a dozen times, with Gary Hardgrave, Chris Smith, Ray Hadley, Luke Grant and 2GB’s news bulletins joining the chorus.


"Joel Labi: Scientists have admitted they got it wrong when it comes to climate change ...

The world has in fact been warming at half the rate it originally claimed.

— 2GB, News Bulletin, 16th September, 2013"

On Tuesday, the Australian’s stablemate, the Daily Telegraph joined the party , repeating the Mail’s mistake—even though it had been exposed by a host of experts—and trumpeting similar joyful conclusions.


"UN RETREATS ON CLIMATE

The leaked reports have led some Australian scientists to say it confirms forecasts of imminent environmental doom are drastically wrong.

— Daily Telegraph, 17th September, 2013"

And who were the ‘Australian scientists’ the Tele relied on?

Well it seems there was only one of them, Bob Carter, until recently at James Cook University in Townsville, who told the Tele’s readers the public had been ‘relentlessly misinformed’.

Inside Professor Bob also penned an opinion piece proclaiming:


"Report gives truth on climate change at last

— Daily Telegraph, 17th September, 2013"

Now as I read this, I couldn’t help remembering that most of the world’s scientists still believe man-made global warming is real, and of concern.

And a 5-second search found the figure I was looking for on the US space agency NASA’s website.


"GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE

Consensus: 97% of climate scientists agree

— climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus
"

It’s not rocket science, but NASA lists several of the eminent academies the Tele could have turned to for comment.

It could also have used quotes we know were provided from the Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science in NSW which pointed out errors in the Australian’s article.

But instead the paper plumped for Professor Carter, who believes global warming stopped 16 years ago, and who recently lost his job at James Cook Uni


"University dumps out-of-step climate change sceptic

— Townsville Bulletin, 28th June, 2013"

Professor Carter who says he was dropped because his views are unpopular is the author of a book called Climate: The Counter Consensus.

Back in 2011 its conclusions were described by Professor Karoly as


"Inconsistent with any scientific assessment of climate change prepared by any major national or international body

— Email from David Karoly, School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, 21st March, 2011"

But some people take Bob Carter much more seriously.

He’s written 12 sceptical columns in the Australian since 2004 and two in the Tele since 2009.

And the shock jocks just love him, which is why 4BC’s Gary Hardgrave and 2GB’s Chris Smith wheeled him out on Monday to gloat over the Mail’s mistaken scoop.


"Bob Carter: The issue here is that at last the IPCC has been forced by the sheer weight of the factual evidence, to admit that most of its previous alarmist assertions are wrong.

Chris Smith: Are you tempted to say ‘I told you so’?

Bob Carter: No, that wouldn’t be polite, I’m a scientist so all I can say is just look at the facts ...

— 2GB, Breakfast Show with Chris Smith, 16th September, 2013"

Yup. Look at the facts, Bob. It’s really good advice.

And we should add that after an approach from Media Watch the Tele did 'clarify' its article.

Media Watch: A real scoop or just hot air? (23/09/2013)
 
You expect us to read all that shit? You trying to put everybody to sleep?

You mean that just because you have the attention span of a fruitfly, you actually imagine that everyone else is also that mentally handicapped and incapable of comprehending anything longer or more complicated than a matchbook cover? That's really hilarious.
 
You expect us to read all that shit? You trying to put everybody to sleep?

You mean that just because you have the attention span of a fruitfly, you actually imagine that everyone else is also that mentally handicapped and incapable of comprehending anything longer or more complicated than a matchbook cover? That's really hilarious.
I mean I have no interest in reading a shitload of propaganda that I've already seen a thousand times. But if you want to waste YOUR time, knock yourself out, sucker. How about if I post an hour-long transcript of Rush Limbaugh's radio show for you to read, would you do it?
 
S.J.

It is definitely worth reading.





As propaganda it is useful for potty duties and nothing else. As usual they make huge claims but then can't back it up with empirical data.

GIGO...
 
Been saying for two decades the whole thing was a hoax from the start!!!

A lot of others were saying it too.......




"We need to get some broad based support,
to capture the public's imagination...
So we have to offer up scary scenarios,
make simplified, dramatic statements
and make little mention of any doubts...
Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest."

- Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports


"We've got to ride this global warming issue.
Even if the theory of global warming is wrong,
we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic and environmental policy."

- Timothy Wirth,
President of the UN Foundation



"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony...
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to
bring about justice and equality in the world."

- Christine Stewart,
former Canadian Minister of the Environment



“The data doesn't matter. We're not basing our recommendations
on the data. We're basing them on the climate models.”

- Prof. Chris Folland,
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research



“The models are convenient fictions
that provide something very useful.”

- Dr David Frame,
climate modeler, Oxford University












614-4.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]
 
Last edited:
"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..." -- IPCC

And now the IPCC is a denier
 
The News reported it incorrectly?

LOL

That's it?

First it's the ocean ate my AGW and now the news got it wrong

AGWCukt is lining up for the Jim Jones Kool-Aid
 
S.J.

It is definitely worth reading.





As propaganda it is useful for potty duties and nothing else. As usual they make huge claims but then can't back it up with empirical data.

GIGO...

Walleyes, AGU conferance coming up in December. I can expect you to be on the podium showing why all the other Phd's have it wrong on global warming? If not, why not?
 
S.J.

It is definitely worth reading.





As propaganda it is useful for potty duties and nothing else. As usual they make huge claims but then can't back it up with empirical data.

GIGO...

Walleyes, AGU conferance coming up in December. I can expect you to be on the podium showing why all the other Phd's have it wrong on global warming? If not, why not?






As soon as the AGU wakes up and smells the roses and ALLOWS a dissenting voice I will most certainly be there olfraud. Unfortunately, they have sold their souls and will not allow any paper to be presented which doesn't support the fraud.
 
The kooks aren't even trying to do science any longer. That's probably for the best, given how hard they suck at it. They're all just raving about the great global socialist conspiracy 24/7 now. It's all they have left.
 
Here is the full report >>>

IPCC Working Group I


Of course, they are fucking with the data again in trying to change the narrative that is already in its 4th revision.

And the AGW alarmists struggle trying to figure out why nobody gives a crap about global warming anymore!! The connect the dots issues are fascinating for people who obviously are very smart!!:eusa_shifty:


Only 26% of the American people trust the scientists on this shit >>>> How Americans see global warming ? in 8 charts

65% of the American people DONT think global warming is a serious problem >>>> Poll: Republicans Cool on Global Warming - US News and World Report






But the "deniers" are a "cult"!!!!:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top