Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
case closed
case closed
My biggest question about the whole Oswald theory is this...... Assuming that Oswald was able to pull off one of the greatest feats in shooting history; a feat which has never (to my knowledge) been able to be repeated, even by some of the best marksmen in the world; How the hell did he do it with a non-functional rifle?
I've done a bit of reading on the Kennedy assassination, and I cannot remember where I read it, but it is my understanding that when the supposed assassination weapon was turned over to the United States Army for test firing they couldn't do it..... BECAUSE THE FIRING PIN WAS BROKEN. Now anyone with a little bit of firearms knowledge knows that a gun with a broken firing pin will not fire.
So, not only did Oswald supposedly pull off probably the greatest shooting feat of all time, he has to have done it with a non-functional rifle. That's a little beyond my ability to accept based on reason, common sense, and simple logic.
My biggest question about the whole Oswald theory is this...... Assuming that Oswald was able to pull off one of the greatest feats in shooting history; a feat which has never (to my knowledge) been able to be repeated, even by some of the best marksmen in the world; How the hell did he do it with a non-functional rifle?
I've done a bit of reading on the Kennedy assassination, and I cannot remember where I read it, but it is my understanding that when the supposed assassination weapon was turned over to the United States Army for test firing they couldn't do it..... BECAUSE THE FIRING PIN WAS BROKEN. Now anyone with a little bit of firearms knowledge knows that a gun with a broken firing pin will not fire.
So, not only did Oswald supposedly pull off probably the greatest shooting feat of all time, he has to have done it with a non-functional rifle. That's a little beyond my ability to accept based on reason, common sense, and simple logic.
I have never met a Marine that says he could not have made the shots that Oswald did.
Oswalds gun was test fired several times to match the bullets
My biggest question about the whole Oswald theory is this...... Assuming that Oswald was able to pull off one of the greatest feats in shooting history; a feat which has never (to my knowledge) been able to be repeated, even by some of the best marksmen in the world; How the hell did he do it with a non-functional rifle?
I've done a bit of reading on the Kennedy assassination, and I cannot remember where I read it, but it is my understanding that when the supposed assassination weapon was turned over to the United States Army for test firing they couldn't do it..... BECAUSE THE FIRING PIN WAS BROKEN. Now anyone with a little bit of firearms knowledge knows that a gun with a broken firing pin will not fire.
So, not only did Oswald supposedly pull off probably the greatest shooting feat of all time, he has to have done it with a non-functional rifle. That's a little beyond my ability to accept based on reason, common sense, and simple logic.
I have never met a Marine that says he could not have made the shots that Oswald did.
Oswalds gun was test fired several times to match the bullets
I know one US Marine slogan is: The Few. The Proud.
I didn't know that 'The Few' means a Marine can make a bullet that enters a wound at a downward trajectory exit a wound 6" higher, which would then be a UPward trajectory, then continue on to the second victim, somehow regaining a downward trajectory, when the only substance between the two victims is air...
I have never met a Marine that says he could not have made the shots that Oswald did.
Oswalds gun was test fired several times to match the bullets
I know one US Marine slogan is: The Few. The Proud.
I didn't know that 'The Few' means a Marine can make a bullet that enters a wound at a downward trajectory exit a wound 6" higher, which would then be a UPward trajectory, then continue on to the second victim, somehow regaining a downward trajectory, when the only substance between the two victims is air...
So....your theory is that the bullet had an UPward trajectory moving up 6 inches over a distance of less than a foot
That would place the location of the shooter in the trunk of JFKs car
case closed
your an idiot dumbfuck afraid of the truth who has done nothing more than read the warren commission report and agent candyfag here LOVES you for that.
CASE CLOSED.
I have never met a Marine that says he could not have made the shots that Oswald did.
Oswalds gun was test fired several times to match the bullets
I know one US Marine slogan is: The Few. The Proud.
I didn't know that 'The Few' means a Marine can make a bullet that enters a wound at a downward trajectory exit a wound 6" higher, which would then be a UPward trajectory, then continue on to the second victim, somehow regaining a downward trajectory, when the only substance between the two victims is air...
So....your theory is that the bullet had an UPward trajectory moving up 6 inches over a distance of less than a foot
That would place the location of the shooter in the trunk of JFKs car
I know one US Marine slogan is: The Few. The Proud.
I didn't know that 'The Few' means a Marine can make a bullet that enters a wound at a downward trajectory exit a wound 6" higher, which would then be a UPward trajectory, then continue on to the second victim, somehow regaining a downward trajectory, when the only substance between the two victims is air...
So....your theory is that the bullet had an UPward trajectory moving up 6 inches over a distance of less than a foot
That would place the location of the shooter in the trunk of JFKs car
Yeah, they never checked the trunk of the car for an assassin; I do remember a SS guy jumping onto the back of the car as it sped away...now THAT sounds suspicious..he must have saw John Malbo or the other dude there.
Either that or they made a mistake on the paperwork. I'm guessing the former since it is much harder, damn near impossible, nobody saw it, and makes no sense whatsoever.
lol
My biggest question about the whole Oswald theory is this...... Assuming that Oswald was able to pull off one of the greatest feats in shooting history; a feat which has never (to my knowledge) been able to be repeated, even by some of the best marksmen in the world; How the hell did he do it with a non-functional rifle?
I've done a bit of reading on the Kennedy assassination, and I cannot remember where I read it, but it is my understanding that when the supposed assassination weapon was turned over to the United States Army for test firing they couldn't do it..... BECAUSE THE FIRING PIN WAS BROKEN. Now anyone with a little bit of firearms knowledge knows that a gun with a broken firing pin will not fire.
So, not only did Oswald supposedly pull off probably the greatest shooting feat of all time, he has to have done it with a non-functional rifle. That's a little beyond my ability to accept based on reason, common sense, and simple logic.
I have never met a Marine that says he could not have made the shots that Oswald did.
Oswalds gun was test fired several times to match the bullets
I know one US Marine slogan is: The Few. The Proud.
I didn't know that 'The Few' means a Marine can make a bullet that enters a wound at a downward trajectory exit a wound 6" higher, which would then be a UPward trajectory, then continue on to the second victim, somehow regaining a downward trajectory, when the only substance between the two victims is air...
so....your theory is that the bullet had an upward trajectory moving up 6 inches over a distance of less than a foot
that would place the location of the shooter in the trunk of jfks car
yeah, they never checked the trunk of the car for an assassin; i do remember a ss guy jumping onto the back of the car as it sped away...now that sounds suspicious..he must have saw john malbo or the other dude there.
Either that or they made a mistake on the paperwork. I'm guessing the former since it is much harder, damn near impossible, nobody saw it, and makes no sense whatsoever.
Lol
i doubt it.
Making a mistake in the paper work is not a realistic explanation. The shooter in the trunk is the only reasonable explanation
My biggest question about the whole Oswald theory is this...... Assuming that Oswald was able to pull off one of the greatest feats in shooting history; a feat which has never (to my knowledge) been able to be repeated, even by some of the best marksmen in the world; How the hell did he do it with a non-functional rifle?
I've done a bit of reading on the Kennedy assassination, and I cannot remember where I read it, but it is my understanding that when the supposed assassination weapon was turned over to the United States Army for test firing they couldn't do it..... BECAUSE THE FIRING PIN WAS BROKEN. Now anyone with a little bit of firearms knowledge knows that a gun with a broken firing pin will not fire.
So, not only did Oswald supposedly pull off probably the greatest shooting feat of all time, he has to have done it with a non-functional rifle. That's a little beyond my ability to accept based on reason, common sense, and simple logic.
My biggest question about the whole Oswald theory is this...... Assuming that Oswald was able to pull off one of the greatest feats in shooting history; a feat which has never (to my knowledge) been able to be repeated, even by some of the best marksmen in the world; How the hell did he do it with a non-functional rifle?
I've done a bit of reading on the Kennedy assassination, and I cannot remember where I read it, but it is my understanding that when the supposed assassination weapon was turned over to the United States Army for test firing they couldn't do it..... BECAUSE THE FIRING PIN WAS BROKEN. Now anyone with a little bit of firearms knowledge knows that a gun with a broken firing pin will not fire.
So, not only did Oswald supposedly pull off probably the greatest shooting feat of all time, he has to have done it with a non-functional rifle. That's a little beyond my ability to accept based on reason, common sense, and simple logic.
I have never met a Marine that says he could not have made the shots that Oswald did.
Oswalds gun was test fired several times to match the bullets