HUGGY
I Post Because I Care
Depends on what they are willing to pay.
In your case, wouldn't a dime bag of crack be MORE than enough?
You tease you...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Depends on what they are willing to pay.
In your case, wouldn't a dime bag of crack be MORE than enough?
So your dog is talking to you now? Please tell me you are not going Postal.
Where exactly were you again in 1977? .... Sam?
I believe Son of Sam listened to his neighbors dog. My neighbors dogs are fools.
My dogs are smart and give good advice.
As in ""It put's the lotion on it's skin" advice??? !!!
Does this help?
God and Abraham would sit at arms length and chat by the fire. If God said something that Sarah thought was funny, she'd poke her head out of the tent and laugh at Him. She named her child "Laughter" because she laughed at a prediction God made concerning her.
Not a lot of "faith" was necessary for Abraham to "believe" there was a God. Especially since Abraham relied on God for just about everything! And Abraham knew God had already promised him that Issac would bear grandchildren for Abraham. So for Abraham to believe that if he killed Issac, God would bring him right back wasn't a stretch for Abraham.
Nevertheless, putting a child that you adore to suffer and die would be a gut wrenching, grievous pain to have to experience, even if he did come right back to life. But Abraham's friend didn't let that happen.
So, it did test the strength of the faith Abraham had in God, but what it really did was let Abraham feel the pain that Abraham's dear friend, God, WAS going to feel, when the son HE adored.............
It sounds like an inane test, the way you framed it here.
Possibly, for a disinterested 3rd party, but Abraham and God were close. And since neither participant complained about the actions of the other, after the episode, the test appears to have been effective.
It sounds like an inane test, the way you framed it here.
Possibly, for a disinterested 3rd party, but Abraham and God were close. And since neither participant complained about the actions of the other, after the episode, the test appears to have been effective.
A couple of Quick questions
What did this "Pain" do for Abraham again?
Also, why was it necessary for god to let Abraham experience this pain?
The issue of "closeness" tend to go against the point of letting Abraham experience pain unecessarily. Why would you or anyone else wish to provide suffering to someone if you care about them?
Also, the pain God experienced is quantified with god possessing the ability to stop the death of his son. Abraham did not have such ability thus making the experiences dramatically different, unless you are suggesting God is "forced" to act against his own will?