If you have a job

[deltex1]

Maybe you can keep your job.....

Robust Obabble economy...




Americans Not in Labor Force Exceed 93 Million for First Time 62.7 Labor Force Participation Matches 37-Year Low CNS News

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Capitalism baby, and retired people.

 

[pinqy]

Maybe you can keep your job.....

Robust Obabble economy...




Americans Not in Labor Force Exceed 93 Million for First Time 62.7 Labor Force Participation Matches 37-Year Low CNS News

Huh, they don't mention that January 2015 had the record high Labor force level and we currently have more people employed than ever before. Or more importantly...that the number of people who don't want a job is at its highest.

 

[Esmeralda]

The work force, for those who want to work, is very high now. Obama's economic strategies have evidently worked well.

Obama Outperforms Reagan On Jobs Growth And Investing - Forbes

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Maybe you can keep your job.....

Robust Obabble economy...




Americans Not in Labor Force Exceed 93 Million for First Time 62.7 Labor Force Participation Matches 37-Year Low CNS News

Huh, they don't mention that January 2015 had the record high Labor force level and we currently have more people employed than ever before. Or more importantly...that the number of people who don't want a job is at its highest.

Say what?!?!?!!?!

LFPR FALLS TO LOWEST LEVEL SINCE 1978 - Business Insider

 

[g5000]

The LFPR has held steady for the past 12 months, varying very little.

The 14 year plunge which began long before Obama took office has been halted.

 

[Edgetho]

Capitalism baby, and retired people.

Stupidity in a child can be endearing. In an adult? It gets trying. Extremely trying.

EVERYBODY knows the economy has stalled -- Stupid. Everybody.

The top 20% of Americans have seen their wages go up while the other 80% has seen them fall.

More and more people are falling out of the labor force while many others, who shouldn't have to work have to go back IN to the labor force in order to make ends meet.

I suggest that, in the future, your posts should consist of a series of 'Ga-Ga, Goo-Goo, Da-Da, Ma-Ma' and you might want to slobber all over yourself a time or two.

You'd look more intelligent than you do now

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Capitalism baby, and retired people.

Stupidity in a child can be endearing. In an adult? It gets trying. Extremely trying.

EVERYBODY knows the economy has stalled -- Stupid. Everybody.

The top 20% of Americans have seen their wages go up while the other 80% has seen them fall.

More and more people are falling out of the labor force while many others, who shouldn't have to work have to go back IN to the labor force in order to make ends meet.

I suggest that, in the future, your posts should consist of a series of 'Ga-Ga, Goo-Goo, Da-Da, Ma-Ma' and you might want to slobber all over yourself a time or two.

You'd look more intelligent than you do now

What part of capitalism do you not understand?

 

[Edgetho]

One other thing that I haven't seen brought up (shocking, huh?)

March Jobs Report Everything You Need to Know - MoneyBeat - WSJ

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the economy added 126,000 jobs in March, with the unemployment rate steady at 5.5%. This was well below consensus of 248,000. January and February were also revised down, erasing 69,000 jobs.

dimocraps are just freaking stupid

The economy SUCKS. Especially compared to where it should be.

Eight years of pent-up demand, eight years of stagnation, six years of promises and wasted Taxpayer money thrown away by the Lying Cocksucker in Chief, given as paybacks to his bundlers and campaign fund contributors.....

And guess who's getting hurt the worst? the Lying Scumbag's own constituents.

Because they're stupid. And I don't feel the least bit sorry for them.

Hopefully, it will keep their reproductive rate down but that doesn't seem likely

 

[Edgetho]

What part of capitalism do you not understand?

I've read Hayek (not Selma) (oh, and 'von' just means 'from' in German so I usually exclude it), some of Keynes (May-Nard!!), most of Marx (who was trained as a lawyer and not as an economist) and some of Schumpeter (if you read Marx, you gotta read Schumpeter) Mises and a few others that I can't think of right now....

Plus, I was in the Financial Service Industry for 20 years. Did pretty good for myself, too. Not rich. FAR from it. But I retired at age 52.

How about you?

Illustrate to us all how brilliant you are

 

[deltex1]

Capitalism baby, and retired people.

So it will help if we deport all those young illegals?

 

[g5000]

126,000 jobs were added, and the tards are trying to find a way to make that a BAD thing.

And let's see. The jobs for January and February were revised down a total of 69,000. So instead of 534,000 jobs, we had 465,000 added. And that is STILL very, very good. Especially when compared to the 800,000 jobs lost in the month Obama took office.

Sorry, rubes! Keep trying to root for bad news, though, eh? It reveals your true character. Party over jobs.

 

[pinqy]

Maybe you can keep your job.....

Robust Obabble economy...




Americans Not in Labor Force Exceed 93 Million for First Time 62.7 Labor Force Participation Matches 37-Year Low CNS News

Huh, they don't mention that January 2015 had the record high Labor force level and we currently have more people employed than ever before. Or more importantly...that the number of people who don't want a job is at its highest.

Say what?!?!?!!?!

LFPR FALLS TO LOWEST LEVEL SINCE 1978 - Business Insider

And? The LFPR is Employed plus Unemployed divided by the adult civilian non-institutional population. Employed is the highest ever, unemployed is not, the population is highest ever.

Look: Last year in March, there were 247,085,000 people in the population. There were 145,301,000 employed and 10,387,000 unemployed for a Labor Force of 155,688,000
The LFPR then was 155,688,000/247,085,000 = 63.0%

This March, the population was 250,080,000 which is higher. Employment was 148,331,000, which is also higher. Unemployed was lower at 8,575,000 but labor force was higher at 156,906,000. But LFPR then was 156,906,000/250,080,000 = 62.7%. Levels are higher, perscentage is lower.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Maybe you can keep your job.....

Robust Obabble economy...




Americans Not in Labor Force Exceed 93 Million for First Time 62.7 Labor Force Participation Matches 37-Year Low CNS News

Huh, they don't mention that January 2015 had the record high Labor force level and we currently have more people employed than ever before. Or more importantly...that the number of people who don't want a job is at its highest.

Say what?!?!?!!?!

LFPR FALLS TO LOWEST LEVEL SINCE 1978 - Business Insider

And? The LFPR is Employed plus Unemployed divided by the adult civilian non-institutional population. Employed is the highest ever, unemployed is not, the population is highest ever.

Look: Last year in March, there were 247,085,000 people in the population. There were 145,301,000 employed and 10,387,000 unemployed for a Labor Force of 155,688,000
The LFPR then was 155,688,000/247,085,000 = 63.0%

This March, the population was 250,080,000 which is higher. Employment was 148,331,000, which is also higher. Unemployed was lower at 8,575,000 but labor force was higher at 156,906,000. But LFPR then was 156,906,000/250,080,000 = 62.7%. Levels are higher, perscentage is lower.

You're obviously clueless, a democrat I presume?

 

[Two Thumbs]

Maybe you can keep your job.....

Robust Obabble economy...




Americans Not in Labor Force Exceed 93 Million for First Time 62.7 Labor Force Participation Matches 37-Year Low CNS News

my employer is looking to add a 3rd shift

we sell low priced cheap crap from china and boxes of rocks.

so yea, we're doing great

 

[g5000]

Capitalism baby, and retired people.

So it will help if we deport all those young illegals?

Only a retard thinks illegals steal jobs.

You need to make up your minds. Are they stealing jobs, or are they stealing welfare?

We had full employment in 2007, with just as many illegals as we have now. Then something really bad happened from 2007 to 2009 that caused all this unemployment. Maybe you heard about it. It was in all the papers.

Hint: It had nothing to do with Mexicans.

 

[pinqy]

Maybe you can keep your job.....

Robust Obabble economy...




Americans Not in Labor Force Exceed 93 Million for First Time 62.7 Labor Force Participation Matches 37-Year Low CNS News

Huh, they don't mention that January 2015 had the record high Labor force level and we currently have more people employed than ever before. Or more importantly...that the number of people who don't want a job is at its highest.

Say what?!?!?!!?!

LFPR FALLS TO LOWEST LEVEL SINCE 1978 - Business Insider

And? The LFPR is Employed plus Unemployed divided by the adult civilian non-institutional population. Employed is the highest ever, unemployed is not, the population is highest ever.

Look: Last year in March, there were 247,085,000 people in the population. There were 145,301,000 employed and 10,387,000 unemployed for a Labor Force of 155,688,000
The LFPR then was 155,688,000/247,085,000 = 63.0%

This March, the population was 250,080,000 which is higher. Employment was 148,331,000, which is also higher. Unemployed was lower at 8,575,000 but labor force was higher at 156,906,000. But LFPR then was 156,906,000/250,080,000 = 62.7%. Levels are higher, perscentage is lower.

You're obviously clueless, a democrat I presume?

Is the employment level at its highest level or not? Is the Labor Force Level near its highest or not? And politics doesn't affect whether or not something is true.

 

[g5000]

Maybe you can keep your job.....

Robust Obabble economy...




Americans Not in Labor Force Exceed 93 Million for First Time 62.7 Labor Force Participation Matches 37-Year Low CNS News

Huh, they don't mention that January 2015 had the record high Labor force level and we currently have more people employed than ever before. Or more importantly...that the number of people who don't want a job is at its highest.

Say what?!?!?!!?!

LFPR FALLS TO LOWEST LEVEL SINCE 1978 - Business Insider

And? The LFPR is Employed plus Unemployed divided by the adult civilian non-institutional population. Employed is the highest ever, unemployed is not, the population is highest ever.

Look: Last year in March, there were 247,085,000 people in the population. There were 145,301,000 employed and 10,387,000 unemployed for a Labor Force of 155,688,000
The LFPR then was 155,688,000/247,085,000 = 63.0%

This March, the population was 250,080,000 which is higher. Employment was 148,331,000, which is also higher. Unemployed was lower at 8,575,000 but labor force was higher at 156,906,000. But LFPR then was 156,906,000/250,080,000 = 62.7%. Levels are higher, perscentage is lower.

You're obviously clueless, a democrat I presume?

You are obviously innumerate. A Republican, I presume?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Maybe you can keep your job.....

Robust Obabble economy...




Americans Not in Labor Force Exceed 93 Million for First Time 62.7 Labor Force Participation Matches 37-Year Low CNS News

Huh, they don't mention that January 2015 had the record high Labor force level and we currently have more people employed than ever before. Or more importantly...that the number of people who don't want a job is at its highest.

Say what?!?!?!!?!

LFPR FALLS TO LOWEST LEVEL SINCE 1978 - Business Insider

And? The LFPR is Employed plus Unemployed divided by the adult civilian non-institutional population. Employed is the highest ever, unemployed is not, the population is highest ever.

Look: Last year in March, there were 247,085,000 people in the population. There were 145,301,000 employed and 10,387,000 unemployed for a Labor Force of 155,688,000
The LFPR then was 155,688,000/247,085,000 = 63.0%

This March, the population was 250,080,000 which is higher. Employment was 148,331,000, which is also higher. Unemployed was lower at 8,575,000 but labor force was higher at 156,906,000. But LFPR then was 156,906,000/250,080,000 = 62.7%. Levels are higher, perscentage is lower.

You're obviously clueless, a democrat I presume?

Is the employment level at its highest level or not? Is the Labor Force Level near its highest or not? And politics doesn't affect whether or not something is true.

You have over 90 million out of the workforce....now do the math. You've swallowed the Kool Aid

 

[g5000]

Maybe you can keep your job.....

Robust Obabble economy...




Americans Not in Labor Force Exceed 93 Million for First Time 62.7 Labor Force Participation Matches 37-Year Low CNS News

Huh, they don't mention that January 2015 had the record high Labor force level and we currently have more people employed than ever before. Or more importantly...that the number of people who don't want a job is at its highest.

Say what?!?!?!!?!

LFPR FALLS TO LOWEST LEVEL SINCE 1978 - Business Insider

And? The LFPR is Employed plus Unemployed divided by the adult civilian non-institutional population. Employed is the highest ever, unemployed is not, the population is highest ever.

Look: Last year in March, there were 247,085,000 people in the population. There were 145,301,000 employed and 10,387,000 unemployed for a Labor Force of 155,688,000
The LFPR then was 155,688,000/247,085,000 = 63.0%

This March, the population was 250,080,000 which is higher. Employment was 148,331,000, which is also higher. Unemployed was lower at 8,575,000 but labor force was higher at 156,906,000. But LFPR then was 156,906,000/250,080,000 = 62.7%. Levels are higher, perscentage is lower.

You're obviously clueless, a democrat I presume?

Is the employment level at its highest level or not? Is the Labor Force Level near its highest or not? And politics doesn't affect whether or not something is true.

U1 through U6 have all declined in the past year. Sassy got her ass spanked last month on this subject.

But that doesn't stop the innumerate tards from trying again and again. You can fight ignorance, but you can't fight willful stupidity.