If World War III Started Today What Would the Sides Be?

[GHook93]

Axis:
China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Turkey, Pakistan, Syria, South Africa

Allies:
NATO would fold and only a few would take sides
US, France, UK, Germany, Hungry, Austria, Australia, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Israel, India, Mexico, Brazil.

No winners, since the world would mostly be destroyed.

 

[TheOldSchool]

What about Japan and India?

 

[SixFoot]

Sides? There would be my side, and everyone else.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Seems to me the allies would clean house.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Sides in a hypothetical World War 3 will be this:

Islam vs Everybody Else.

I don't know who'll win.

 

[Swagger]

An Islam vs. West scenario would be between an American-European alliance and radicalised Islamic states. This is because we're 'soft' in the eyes of the Mohammedan. Notice how the likes of al-Qaeda don't pull any of their shit in places like China. It's because they know the suffering would be unimagineable if they were caught. If you look up what happened to Jihadists in Saudi Arabia, you'll see why al-Qaeda hightailed it out of there. To truly defeat the Mohammadan we must rise to their level of barbarity. In the mid '80s, Russian diplomats were kidnapped by Hezbollah. What Russia's Alpha Group did ensured that no Russian citizens have been targeted in the Middle East since. They actually kidnapped the militants' children (some of them only babies) and began sending them fingers and toes before the militants lost their resolve and freed the hostages.

 

[shart_attack]

Axis: China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Turkey, Pakistan, Syria, South Africa

Allies: NATO would fold and only a few would take sides US, France, UK, Germany, Hungry, Austria, Australia, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Israel, India, Mexico, Brazil.

No winners, since the world would mostly be destroyed.

Nope. you got it all wrong.

Russia is actively very surreptitiously on the Allied side.

China is the x-factor. The Allies will let them clamp down on the North Korean menace. But as that conflict should end fairly quickly, the Allies will have to concentrate again on Japan's being surreptitiously tied to the Axis in a case of WWII deja vu.

The Allies cannot trust the Japs.

South Korea?

A sham. Hell, we'll let China have that worthless piece of garbage jam-packed with ingrate scum.

France is a farce of an ally. They will fold to Islam, just like they folded to Hitler in WWII.

Hungary and the rest of the former Eastern Bloc will be annexed by Russia for the good of the greater conflict: the Holy War against Islam.

Israel will play a central role for the Allies as well.

What can Mexico do for the Allies, aside from providing us draftable young Catholic men who will not convert to Islam? They may hold a vendetta against the Allies simply for America's anti-immigration policies of the past.

Which brings up a very important key player in the war that you have not listed.

VENEZUELA.

They are a serious threat to the Allies, given their global position and wealth of petroleum, which they can use to supply to the Axis' war efforts in the Western hemisphere.

It is not going to be pretty, this war. Not for the Allies.

That's why we need the USSR on our side this time again — just like in WWII.

 

[Swagger]

If there was ever another world war, I think that allegiances would be determined on whether you're a traditionalist or a socially progressive-inclined country.

 

[shart_attack]

If there was ever another world war, I think that allegiances would be determined on whether you're a traditionalist or a socially progressive-inclined country.

I checked "agree" with you only because I agree with you to some extent.

But the eminence of the USSR presents a dilemma for your theory, because under Putin's leadership, they could be defined both as traditionalist (i.e. with regard to political positions regarding the championing of the traditional definition of the family, Soviet work ethic, etc.) and socially-progressive (for the same Soviet work ethic, for all things done for the greater good of the state at the expense of the individual).

 

[rightwinger]

US vs Canada

Canada has been massing their population on our border for generations. It is only a matter of time

Beware the Red Menace

Should be a good fight

 

[Swagger]

The USSR no longer exists, and Russia is no longer a communist country. They're capitalists - however enthusiastically - but firmly reject the kind of behaviour/degeneracy we see in the West. The press might cover minor social movements and give a false impression of what everyday Russians think of things like gay marriage, but the majority are staunch traditionalists.

 

[B. Kidd]

I say we attack Grenada again. A war we can win!

 

[shart_attack]

The USSR no longer exists, and Russia is no longer a communist country. They're capitalists - however enthusiastically - but firmly reject the kind of behaviour/degeneracy we see in the West. The press might cover minor social movements and give a false impression of what everyday Russians think of things like gay marriage, but the majority are staunch traditionalists.

And that's exactly why the West needs to butt out of their affairs.

They will return as the USSR in name only, though.

 

[GHook93]

An Islam vs. West scenario would be between an American-European alliance and radicalised Islamic states. This is because we're 'soft' in the eyes of the Mohammedan. Notice how the likes of al-Qaeda don't pull any of their shit in places like China.

Not true, Islamist separatist regularly attack China!

Deadly China attack blamed on Islamic separatists

 

[haissem123]

ww3 is well under way, you just weren't told about it in between quarters or during commercials of walking dead. they've taken your minds and few have any souls left so, it's game over for most already.

 

[Swagger]

An Islam vs. West scenario would be between an American-European alliance and radicalised Islamic states. This is because we're 'soft' in the eyes of the Mohammedan. Notice how the likes of al-Qaeda don't pull any of their shit in places like China.

Not true, Islamist separatist regularly attack China!

Deadly China attack blamed on Islamic separatists

You say "regularly", but that looks like an isolated incident. What do you think Beijing's reaction would be if Islamists detonated a bomb on their subway?

 

[rightwinger]

I imagine a conflict between Shirts and Skins

 

[shart_attack]

I imagine a conflict between Shirts and Skins

I imagine one between shorts and sharts.

 

[GHook93]

If it's Islam vs the West. It won't be a traditional war. Actually this is a war that is already well underway. In Europe, the Muslim invaders are flooding these countries. They produce well more children than they can take care of. In effect, they well over-use the welfare state and the native Europeans are stuck with burden of paying that bill. Since they have such a large economic burden the native European are having less to no children. However, the Muslim legal and illegal immigrants flood into the country.

An Islam vs. West scenario would be between an American-European alliance and radicalised Islamic states. This is because we're 'soft' in the eyes of the Mohammedan. Notice how the likes of al-Qaeda don't pull any of their shit in places like China.

Not true, Islamist separatist regularly attack China!

Deadly China attack blamed on Islamic separatists

You say "regularly", but that looks like an isolated incident. What do you think Beijing's reaction would be if Islamists detonated a bomb on their subway?

Whenever the Islamist attack, protest or do what Muslims do, they Chinese hit them over the head with a sledge-hammer!

 

[Swagger]

If it's Islam vs the West. It won't be a traditional war. Actually this is a war that is already well underway. In Europe, the Muslim invaders are flooding these countries. They produce well more children than they can take care of. In effect, they well over-use the welfare state and the native Europeans are stuck with burden of paying that bill. Since they have such a large economic burden the native European are having less to no children. However, the Muslim legal and illegal immigrants flood into the country.

An Islam vs. West scenario would be between an American-European alliance and radicalised Islamic states. This is because we're 'soft' in the eyes of the Mohammedan. Notice how the likes of al-Qaeda don't pull any of their shit in places like China.

Not true, Islamist separatist regularly attack China!

Deadly China attack blamed on Islamic separatists

You say "regularly", but that looks like an isolated incident. What do you think Beijing's reaction would be if Islamists detonated a bomb on their subway?

Whenever the Islamist attack, protest or do what Muslims do, they Chinese hit them over the head with a sledge-hammer!

I can't disagree with anything you've written.

I'm not just saying this because we're in agreement and you're a Jew; but I've never agreed with the Stormfront line that the E.U. is quietly controlled by the Jews. It's an insane, suicidal nightmare that is perpetuated by socialist gentile dictators who are secretly terrified of the Muslim horde. And the Muslims are milking that fear for all they can get. The only solution I can see to end this madness is direct, paramilitary action against the E.U. itself.