If we're going to boycott Israel, we need to boycott the United States too...

[Blackrook]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

 

[Truth1253]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

All this talk about the past is stupid to me. People that say they’re so worried about the past is because theyre lacking in the present.

 

[P F Tinmore]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

There is a big difference. When those other countries were conquered, military conquest was not illegal. There were no international laws to protect those people.

When Israel conquered Palestine, military conquest was illegal. Boycotting Israel is to compel it to abide by international law.

 

[Issa]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

US, New Zealand they give so much benefits to the natives, Israel bomb the shit out of the occupied territories, torture their kids, shoot their men big difference.

 

[Linkiloo]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

There is a big difference. When those other countries were conquered, military conquest was not illegal. There were no international laws to protect those people.

When Israel conquered Palestine, military conquest was illegal. Boycotting Israel is to compel it to abide by international law.

This argument would only make sense if there were a standards universally applicable to all countries, currently involved in civil or cross border disputes. But if Israel is condemned more than other much bloodier conflicts, that is anti-semitism.

 

[Linkiloo]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

US, New Zealand they give so much benefits to the natives, Israel bomb the shit out of the occupied territories, torture their kids, shoot their men big difference.

Benefits to the natives? Are you kidding? Ask the Maoris if they agree? idiot.

 

[Truth1253]

Eve started all of this

 

[P F Tinmore]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

There is a big difference. When those other countries were conquered, military conquest was not illegal. There were no international laws to protect those people.

When Israel conquered Palestine, military conquest was illegal. Boycotting Israel is to compel it to abide by international law.

This argument would only make sense if there were a standards universally applicable to all countries, currently involved in civil or cross border disputes. But if Israel is condemned more than other much bloodier conflicts, that is anti-semitism.

The Palestinians have called for a boycott. I don't think anyone else has.

 

[Penelope]

Eve started all of this

Eve who?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

There is a big difference. When those other countries were conquered, military conquest was not illegal. There were no international laws to protect those people.

When Israel conquered Palestine, military conquest was illegal. Boycotting Israel is to compel it to abide by international law.

This argument would only make sense if there were a standards universally applicable to all countries, currently involved in civil or cross border disputes. But if Israel is condemned more than other much bloodier conflicts, that is anti-semitism.

The Palestinians have called for a boycott. I don't think anyone else has.

Many Hasidim Jews have too, over Israel's draft.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

What's unique, is that Israel is the only modern country to do this.

 

[georgephillip]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

When European Jews began the Zionist project intended to convert Palestine into a Jewish majority state, there were ten times as many non-Jews as Jews living there.

By 1948 the ratio had shrunk to 2:1

Today there are roughly equal numbers of Jews and non-Jews living between the River and the sea.

A majority of Jews have made it clear they will not accept a non-Jewish minority of more than 20%.

That example of blatant apartheid should be exterminated everywhere.

Nakba 68 - The Tragedy continues - Skibbereen Eagle

 

[Indeependent]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

US, New Zealand they give so much benefits to the natives, Israel bomb the shit out of the occupied territories, torture their kids, shoot their men big difference.

How about some video?

 

[Indeependent]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

When European Jews began the Zionist project intended to convert Palestine into a Jewish majority state, there were ten times as many non-Jews as Jews living there.

By 1948 the ratio had shrunk to 2:1

Today there are roughly equal numbers of Jews and non-Jews living between the River and the sea.

A majority of Jews have made it clear they will not accept a non-Jewish minority of more than 20%.

That example of blatant apartheid should be exterminated everywhere.

Nakba 68 - The Tragedy continues - Skibbereen Eagle

No problem...attack Israel.
Oh yeah...that worked out real well.
Perhaps you’re worshipping an idol that can’t answer your fervent prayers?

 

[georgephillip]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

When European Jews began the Zionist project intended to convert Palestine into a Jewish majority state, there were ten times as many non-Jews as Jews living there.

By 1948 the ratio had shrunk to 2:1

Today there are roughly equal numbers of Jews and non-Jews living between the River and the sea.

A majority of Jews have made it clear they will not accept a non-Jewish minority of more than 20%.

That example of blatant apartheid should be exterminated everywhere.

Nakba 68 - The Tragedy continues - Skibbereen Eagle

No problem...attack Israel.
Oh yeah...that worked out real well.
Perhaps you’re worshipping an idol that can’t answer your fervent prayers?

No problem...attack Israel.
Oh yeah...that worked out real well.
Perhaps you’re worshipping an idol that can’t answer your fervent prayers?

I don't worship apartheid, and prayers won't end that practice in Israel.

"The Security Council can take action to maintain or restore international peace and security under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. Sanctions measures, under Article 41, encompass a broad range of enforcement options that do not involve the use of armed force.

"Since 1966, the Security Council has established 30 sanctions regimes, in Southern Rhodesia, South Africa, the former Yugoslavia (2), Haiti, Iraq (2), Angola, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia and Eritrea, Eritrea and Ethiopia, Liberia (3), DRC, Côte d’Ivoire, Sudan, Lebanon, DPRK, Iran, Libya (2), Guinea-Bissau, CAR, Yemen, South Sudan and Mali, as well as against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida and the Taliban."

Sanctions | United Nations Security Council

 

[Indeependent]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

When European Jews began the Zionist project intended to convert Palestine into a Jewish majority state, there were ten times as many non-Jews as Jews living there.

By 1948 the ratio had shrunk to 2:1

Today there are roughly equal numbers of Jews and non-Jews living between the River and the sea.

A majority of Jews have made it clear they will not accept a non-Jewish minority of more than 20%.

That example of blatant apartheid should be exterminated everywhere.

Nakba 68 - The Tragedy continues - Skibbereen Eagle

No problem...attack Israel.
Oh yeah...that worked out real well.
Perhaps you’re worshipping an idol that can’t answer your fervent prayers?

No problem...attack Israel.
Oh yeah...that worked out real well.
Perhaps you’re worshipping an idol that can’t answer your fervent prayers?

I don't worship apartheid, and prayers won't end that practice in Israel.

"The Security Council can take action to maintain or restore international peace and security under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. Sanctions measures, under Article 41, encompass a broad range of enforcement options that do not involve the use of armed force.

"Since 1966, the Security Council has established 30 sanctions regimes, in Southern Rhodesia, South Africa, the former Yugoslavia (2), Haiti, Iraq (2), Angola, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia and Eritrea, Eritrea and Ethiopia, Liberia (3), DRC, Côte d’Ivoire, Sudan, Lebanon, DPRK, Iran, Libya (2), Guinea-Bissau, CAR, Yemen, South Sudan and Mali, as well as against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida and the Taliban."

Sanctions | United Nations Security Council

And the Arabs multiply like flies.

 

[LaDairis]

Israel is not uniquely guilty

Yes they are....

israel did 911 - Google Search

 

[georgephillip]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

When European Jews began the Zionist project intended to convert Palestine into a Jewish majority state, there were ten times as many non-Jews as Jews living there.

By 1948 the ratio had shrunk to 2:1

Today there are roughly equal numbers of Jews and non-Jews living between the River and the sea.

A majority of Jews have made it clear they will not accept a non-Jewish minority of more than 20%.

That example of blatant apartheid should be exterminated everywhere.

Nakba 68 - The Tragedy continues - Skibbereen Eagle

No problem...attack Israel.
Oh yeah...that worked out real well.
Perhaps you’re worshipping an idol that can’t answer your fervent prayers?

No problem...attack Israel.
Oh yeah...that worked out real well.
Perhaps you’re worshipping an idol that can’t answer your fervent prayers?

I don't worship apartheid, and prayers won't end that practice in Israel.

"The Security Council can take action to maintain or restore international peace and security under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. Sanctions measures, under Article 41, encompass a broad range of enforcement options that do not involve the use of armed force.

"Since 1966, the Security Council has established 30 sanctions regimes, in Southern Rhodesia, South Africa, the former Yugoslavia (2), Haiti, Iraq (2), Angola, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia and Eritrea, Eritrea and Ethiopia, Liberia (3), DRC, Côte d’Ivoire, Sudan, Lebanon, DPRK, Iran, Libya (2), Guinea-Bissau, CAR, Yemen, South Sudan and Mali, as well as against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida and the Taliban."

Sanctions | United Nations Security Council

And the Arabs multiply like flies.

nd the Arabs multiply like flies.

Jews have that part covered

 

[LaDairis]

Helping Israel is the worst mistake in US history. Israel has done virtually all of the "unsolved" or "misdiagnosed" terror attacks on the US, starting with JFK.

 

[hunarcy]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

There is a big difference. When those other countries were conquered, military conquest was not illegal. There were no international laws to protect those people.

When Israel conquered Palestine, military conquest was illegal. Boycotting Israel is to compel it to abide by international law.

Perhaps the Arabs should have accepted U.N. Resolution 181 instead of resorting to violence.